Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SMASH-U: A Proposal for Etiologic Classification of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Meretoja, Atte, Strbian, Daniel, Putaala, Jukka, Curtze, Sami, Haapaniemi, Elena, Mustanoja, Satu, Sairanen, Tiina, Satopää, Jarno, Silvennoinen, Heli, Niemelä, Mika, Kaste, Markku, Tatlisumak, Turgut·2012·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: The purpose of this study was to provide a simple and practical clinical classification for the etiology of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods—: We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with ICH treated at the Helsinki University Central Hospital, January 2005 to March 2010 (n=1013). We classified ICH etiology by predefined criteria as structural vascular lesions (S), medication (M), amyloid angiopathy (A), systemic disease (S), hypertension (H), or undetermined (U). Clinical and radiological features and mortality by SMASH-U (Structural lesion, Medication, Amyloid angiopathy, Systemic/other disease, Hypertension, Undetermined) etiology were analyzed. Results—: Structural lesions, namely cavernomas and arteriovenous malformations, caused 5% of the ICH, anticoagulation 14%, and systemic disease 5% (23 liver cirrhosis, 8 thrombocytopenia, and 17 various rare conditions). Amyloid angiopathy (20%) and hypertensive angiopathy (35%) were common, but etiology remained undetermined in 21%. Interrater agreement in classifying cases was high (κ, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.96). Patients with structural lesions had the smallest hemorrhages (median volume, 2.8 mL) and best prognosis (3-month mortality 4%), whereas anticoagulation-related ICHs were largest (13.4 mL) and most often fatal (54%). Overall, median ICH survival was 5½ years, varying strongly by etiology ( P <0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients with structural lesions had the lowest 3-month mortality rates (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01–0.37) and those with anticoagulation (OR, 1.9; 1.0–3.6) or other systemic cause (OR, 4.0; 1.6–10.1) the highest. Conclusions—: In our patients, performing the SMASH-U classification was feasible and interrater agreement excellent. A plausible etiology was determined in most patients but remained elusive in one in 5. In this series, SMASH-U based etiology was strongly associated with survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.112.661603

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Meretoja, A., Strbian, D., Putaala, J., Curtze, S., Haapaniemi, E., Mustanoja, S., Sairanen, T., Satopää, J., Silvennoinen, H., Niemelä, M., Kaste, M., & Tatlisumak, T.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2012-10
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
2592-2597
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2128233748
Cited by
342
References
28
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SMASH-U: A Proposal for Etiologic Classification of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/strokeaha.112.661603
The paper
Meretoja, A., Strbian, D., Putaala, J., Curtze, S., Haapaniemi, E., Mustanoja, S., Sairanen, T., Satopää, J., Silvennoinen, H., Niemelä, M., Kaste, M., & Tatlisumak, T. (2012). SMASH-U: A Proposal for Etiologic Classification of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.112.661603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.