Cited by 80Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementAging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Purpose in Life and Cerebral Infarcts in Community-Dwelling Older People

Open access
Yu, Lei, Boyle, Patricia A., Wilson, Robert S., Levine, Steven R., Schneider, Julie A., Bennett, David A.·2015·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—: Purpose in life, the sense that life has meaning and direction, is associated with reduced risks of adverse health outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether purpose in life protects against the risk of cerebral infarcts among community-dwelling older people. We tested the hypothesis that greater purpose in life is associated with lower risk of cerebral infarcts. Methods—: Participants came from the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Each participant completed a standard measure of purpose in life. Uniform neuropathologic examination identified macroscopic infarcts and microinfarcts, blinded to clinical information. Association of purpose in life with cerebral infarcts was examined in ordinal logistic regression models using a semiquantitative outcome. Results—: Four hundred fifty-three participants were included in the analyses. The mean score on the measure of purpose was 3.5 (SD, 0.5; range, 2.1–5.0). Macroscopic infarcts were found in 154 (34.0%) people, and microinfarcts were found in 128 (28.3%) people. Greater purpose in life was associated with a lower odds of having more macroscopic infarcts (odds ratio, 0.535; 95% confidence interval, 0.346–0.826; P =0.005), but we did not find association with microinfarcts (odds ratio, 0.780; 95% confidence interval, 0.495–1.229; P =0.283). These results persisted after adjusting for vascular risk factors of body mass index, history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and blood pressure, as well as measures of negative affect, physical activity, and clinical stroke. The association with macroscopic infarcts was driven by lacunar infarcts, and was independent of cerebral atherosclerosis and arteriolosclerosis. Conclusions—: Purpose in life may affect risk for cerebral infarcts, specifically macroscopic lacunar infarcts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.114.008010

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher PIL is associated with fewer chronic diseases.

    “In numerous prospective research studies, higher PIL has been associated with better self-rated health,22 fewer chronic diseases (eg, stroke,8,19 myocardial infarctions9), reduced pain,11 less disability,7,10,11 less dementia and Alzheimer's disease,23 and reduced mortality.6,10,11”
  • The strong correlations between PIL, resilience, and social support have been documented in other studies.

    “The strong correlations between PIL, resilience, and social support have been documented in other studies as well.”
  • The average PIL score of 3.9 in this study was generally in the same range as other studies with 5 responses.

    “However, the average PIL score of 3.9 in this study was generally in the same range as other studies with 5 responses.”
  • Numerous prospective studies from 2 to 8 years would strongly suggest that high PIL results in better health and less disability.

    “Numerous prospective studies from 2 to 8 years would strongly suggest that high PIL results in better health and less disability.”
  • While theoretically improving PIL should be possible, the PIL scores are very stable so expectations would predict relatively small changes with any intervention.

    “To date, while theoretically improving PIL should be possible, the PIL scores are very stable so expectations would predict relatively small changes with any intervention.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, L., Boyle, P. A., Wilson, R. S., Levine, S. R., Schneider, J. A., & Bennett, D. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2015-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
1071-1076
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2047745856
Cited by
80
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG33678, R01AG017917, R01-AG-24480, R01-AG34374, R01‐AG17917, R01AG24871, R01AG024480, R01AG024871, R01AG033678, R01AG034374)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL96944, R01HL096944)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
meaning of life, cerebral infarction, microinfarcts, lacunar infarction, community-dwelling older adults, meaning in life, vascular risk factors, cerebral atherosclerosis, arteriolosclerosis, negative affect, physical activity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cerebral Infarction, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review