The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Localization of Executive Functions in Dual-Task Performance with fMRI
Open accessAbstract
We report a study that investigated the neuroanatomical correlates of executive functions in dual-task performance with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants performed an auditory and a visual three-choice reaction task either separately as single tasks or concurrently as dual tasks. In the dual-task condition, two stimuli were presented in rapid succession to ensure interference between the component tasks (psychological refractory period). The behavioral data showed considerable performance decrements in the dual-task compared to the single-task condition. Dual-task-related activation was detected with two different neuroimaging methods. First, we determined dual-task-related activation according to the method of cognitive subtraction. For that purpose, activation in the dual-task was compared directly with activation in the single-task conditions. This analysis revealed that cortical areas along the inferior frontal sulcus (IFS), the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) are involved in dual-task performance. The results of the subtraction method were validated with the method of parametric manipulation. For this purpose, a second dual-task condition was introduced, where the difficulty of the dual-task coordination was increased compared with the first dual-task condition. As expected, behavioral dual-task performance decreased with increased dual-task difficulty. Furthermore, the increased dual-task difficulty led to an increase of activation in those cortical regions that proved to be dual-task related with the subtraction method, that is, the IFS, the MFG, and the IPS. These results support the conclusion that dorsolateral prefrontal and superior parietal cortices are involved in the coordination of concurrent and interfering task processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 · Cited by 3,666
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task
Cohen, J. D., Perlstein, W. M., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Noll, D. C., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386604a0 · Cited by 1,876
On the speed of mental processes
Donders, F. C. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90065-1 · Cited by 1,784
Petrides, M., & Pandya, D. N. (1999) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00518.x · Cited by 1,068 · cited 2×
“Anterior–superior portions of the PFC are assumed to receive input from higher-order auditory and visual association areas (Miller, 2000; Petrides & Pandya, 1999; Romanski et al., 1999).”
BackgroundThe central executive: A concept and some misconceptions
BADDELEY, A. (1998) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561779800513x · Cited by 281
Shima, K., & Tanji, J. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3247 · Cited by 272
A resource model of the neural basis of executive working memory
Bunge, S. A., Klingberg, T., Jacobsen, R. B., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.7.3573 · Cited by 243
Cited by
Capacity limits of information processing in the brain
Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.010 · Cited by 928
Hornak, J., O'Doherty, J., Bramham, J., Rolls, E. T., Morris, R. G., Bullock, P. R., & Polkey, C. E. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892904322926791 · Cited by 603
Performance-dependent inhibition of pain by an executive working memory task
Buhle, J., & Wager, T. D. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.027 · Cited by 249
Alterations in cognitive performance during passive hyperthermia are task dependent
Gaoua, N., Racinais, S., Grantham, J., & El Massioui, F. (2011) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.3109/02656736.2010.516305 · Cited by 234
TOWARDS A GENERAL MODEL OF TEMPORAL DISCOUNTING
van den Bos, W., & McClure, S. M. (2013) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.6 · Cited by 149
Worringer, B., Langner, R., Koch, I., Eickhoff, S. B., Eickhoff, C. R., & Binkofski, F. C. (2019) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01870-4 · Cited by 126
The role of executive control in human drug addiction
Hester, R., Lubman, D. I., & Yücel, M. (2010) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2009_28 · Cited by 83
Single-task fMRI overlap predicts concurrent multitasking interference
Nijboer, M., Borst, J., van Rijn, H., & Taatgen, N. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.082 · Cited by 72
The dual-task practice advantage: empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms
Strobach, T. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01619-4 · Cited by 76
Resolving dual-task interference: an fMRI study
Jiang, Y. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.043 · Cited by 71
Transfer after Dual n -Back Training Depends on Striatal Activation Change
Salminen, T., Kühn, S., Frensch, P. A., & Schubert, T. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2305-15.2016 · Cited by 70
Self-citationThe functional neuroanatomy of multitasking: Combining dual tasking with a short term memory task
Deprez, S., Vandenbulcke, M., Peeters, R., Emsell, L., Amant, F., & Sunaert, S. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.024 · Cited by 52
Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: evidence from task-pair switching
Hirsch, P., Nolden, S., & Koch, I. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000309 · Cited by 48
Heinzel, S., Rimpel, J., Stelzel, C., & Rapp, M. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00085 · Cited by 45
The role of executive functions in psychiatric disorders
Testa, R., & Pantelis, C. (2009) · The Neuropsychology of Mental Illness · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511642197.012 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Müller, K., & von Cramon, D. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1184-1199
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2099724037
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
