The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of Brain Mechanisms for Processing Orthographic and Phonologic Representations
Open accessAbstract
Developmental differences in the neurocognitive networks for lexical processing were examined in 15 adults and 15 children (9-to 12-year-olds) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The lexical tasks involved spelling and rhyming judgments in either the visual or auditory modality. These lexical tasks were compared with nonlinguistic control tasks involving judgments of line patterns or tone sequences. The first main finding was that adults showed greater activation than children during the cross-modal lexical tasks in a region proposed to be involved in mapping between orthographic and phonologic representations. The visual rhyming task, which required conversion from orthography to phonology, produced greater activation for adults in the angular gyrus. The auditory spelling task, which required the conversion from phonology to orthography, also produced greater activation for adults in the angular gyrus. The greater activation for adults suggests they may have a more elaborated posterior heteromodal system for mapping between representational systems. The second main finding was that adults showed greater activation than children during the intra-modal lexical tasks in the angular gyrus. The visual spelling and auditory rhyming did not require conversion between orthography and phonology for correct performance but the adults showed greater activation in a system implicated for this mapping. The greater activation for adults suggests that they have more interactive convergence between representational systems during lexical processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Neuropsychology of fear and loathing
Calder, A. J., Lawrence, A. D., & Young, A. W. (2001) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35072584 · Cited by 927
Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe
Nobre, A. C., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372260a0 · Cited by 789
Development of neural mechanisms for reading.
Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1065 · Cited by 707
THE CORTICAL LOCALIZATION OF THE LEXICONS: POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY EVIDENCE
HOWARD, D., PATTERSON, K., WISE, R., BROWN, W. D., FRISTON, K., WEILLER, C., & FRACKOWIAK, R. (1992) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/115.6.1769 · Cited by 585
The neural circuitry involved in the reading of German words and pseudowords: a PET study
Hagoort, P., Indefrey, P., Brown, C., Herzog, H., Steinmetz, H., & Seitz, R. J. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563490 · Cited by 300
Multiple code activation in word recognition: evidence from rhyme monitoring
Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.7.3.170 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3924 · Cited by 716
An anatomical signature for literacy
Carreiras, M., Seghier, M. L., Baquero, S., Estévez, A., Lozano, A., Devlin, J. T., & Price, C. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08461 · Cited by 512
Neuroimaging studies of word and pseudoword reading: consistencies, inconsistencies, and limitations
Mechelli, A., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., & Price, C. J. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903321208196 · Cited by 315
Sex differences in neural processing of language among children
Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.021 · Cited by 254
Self-citationChurch, J. A., Coalson, R. S., Lugar, H. M., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm228 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1234-1249
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2089960403
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of Brain Mechanisms for Processing Orthographic and Phonologic Representations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/0898929041920496
- The paper
- Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2004). Development of Brain Mechanisms for Processing Orthographic and Phonologic Representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041920496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.