The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Behavioral Realism to Estimate Presence: A Study of the Utility of Postural Responses to Motion Stimuli
Abstract
We recently reported that direct subjective ratings of the sense of presence are potentially unstable and can be biased by previous judgments of the same stimuli (Freeman et al., 1999). Objective measures of the behavioral realism elicited by a display offer an alternative to subjective ratings. Behavioral measures and presence are linked by the premise that, when observers experience a mediated environment (VE or broadcast) that makes them feel present, they will respond to stimuli within the environment as they would to stimuli in the real world. The experiment presented here measured postural responses to a video sequence filmed from the hood of a car traversing a rally track, using stereoscopic and monoscopic presentation. Results demonstrated a positive effect of stereoscopic presentation on the magnitude of postural responses elicited. Posttest subjective ratings of presence, vection, and involvement were also higher for stereoscopically presented stimuli. The postural and subjective measures were not significantly correlated, indicating that nonproprioceptive postural responses are unlikely to provide accurate estimates of presence. Such postural responses may prove useful for the evaluation of displays for specific applications and in the corroboration of group subjective ratings of presence, but cannot be taken in place of subjective ratings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474698565686 · Cited by 6,371
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603 · Cited by 3,034
Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence
Sheridan, T. B. (1992) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120 · Cited by 1,344 · cited 4×
“Variants of the idea have been proposed several times in the literature (for example, Sheridan, 1992; Held & Durlach, 1992; Slater & Usoh, 1994; Slater, Usoh, & Stead, 1994; Slater & Wilbur, 1997; Prothero, 1998; Hendrix & Barfield, 1996; Ohmi, 1998).”
InfluentialDuration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45 · Cited by 1,228
Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments
Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1993) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1993.2.3.221 · Cited by 401
Presence within Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual Display Parameters
Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1996) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1996.5.3.274 · Cited by 331
Effects of Sensory Information and Prior Experience on Direct Subjective Ratings of Presence
Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Pearson, D. E., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (1999) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474699566017 · Cited by 233
Self-citation
Cited by
The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights
Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474601300343603 · Cited by 2,303
From presence to consciousness through virtual reality.
Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1651 · Cited by 1,831
How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence
Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740 · Cited by 1,749
A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474601300343612 · Cited by 1,208
Self-citationA Survey of Presence and Related Concepts
Skarbez, R., Brooks, Jr., & Whitton, M. C. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3134301 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Meddis, R., Pearson, D. E., & IJsselsteijn, W.
- Venue
- Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-164
- ISSN
- 1054-7460 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2176794506
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 17.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Behavioral Realism to Estimate Presence: A Study of the Utility of Postural Responses to Motion Stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/105474600566691
- The paper
- Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Meddis, R., Pearson, D. E., & IJsselsteijn, W. (2000). Using Behavioral Realism to Estimate Presence: A Study of the Utility of Postural Responses to Motion Stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.