Cited by 398School Choice and PerformanceTeacher Education and AssessmentsTeacher Professional Development and Motivation

Can You Recognize an Effective Teacher When You Recruit One?

Rockoff, Jonah E., Jacob, Brian A., Kane, Thomas J., Staiger, Douglas O.·2011·Education Finance and Policy

Abstract

Research on the relationship between teacher characteristics and teacher effectiveness has been underway for over a century, yet little progress has been made in linking teacher quality with factors observable at the time of hire. To extend this literature, we administered an in-depth survey to new math teachers in New York City and collected information on a number of nontraditional predictors of effectiveness, including teaching-specific content knowledge, cognitive ability, personality traits, feelings of self-efficacy, and scores on a commercially available teacher selection instrument. We find that only a few of these predictors have statistically significant relationships with student and teacher outcomes. However, the individual variables load onto two factors, which measure what one might describe as teachers' cognitive and noncognitive skills. We find that both factors have a moderately large and statistically significant relationship with student and teacher outcomes, particularly with student test scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/edfp_a_00022

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Novice and early-career teachers are less effective than their more experienced peers.

    “Studies find that novice and early-career teachers are less effective than their more experienced peers (Clotfelter, Ladd, & Vigdor, 2007; Rockoff, Jacob, Kane, & Staiger, 2011; Wayne & Youngs, 2003) and that, on average, individual teachers make rapid gains in effectiveness during the first several years on the job (Boyd, Lankford, et al., 2008; Rockoff, 2004).”
  • A large body of literature documents a quite weak relationship between observable teacher characteristics and future effectiveness, as well as between measures of teachers' conscientiousness and self-efficacy and future effectiveness.

    “Furthermore, a large body of literature documents the quite weak relationship between observable teacher characteristics and future effectiveness (Clotfelter, Ladd, & Vigdor, 2007; Wayne & Youngs, 2003), as well between measures of teachers’ conscientiousness and self-efficacy and future effectiveness (Rockoff et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rockoff, J. E., Jacob, B. A., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rockoff, Jonah E.
  • Jacob, Brian A.
  • Kane, Thomas J.
  • Staiger, Douglas O.
Venue
Education Finance and Policy
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2011-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
43-74
ISSN
  • 1557-3060 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3079
OpenAlex
W2161945087
Cited by
390
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 20
FWCI
84.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Education Finance and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
Keywords
teacher effectiveness, teacher recruitment, teacher selection, content knowledge, cognitive ability, personality traits, teacher self-efficacy, student test scores, New York City public schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review