Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The First Americans: The Current Debate

Klein, Herbert S.·2016·The Journal of Interdisciplinary History

Abstract

Scholars from multiple disciplines generally agree about new models for the origin and dating of migration to the Western Hemisphere, replacing the rigid Clovis-first model that had dominated texts for the past fifty years. This new research has not resolved all of the questions relating to this migration; serious controversies still exist. But the development of the new field of genetic studies and the recent opening of major South American archaeological sites has resolved many older debates and has provided a far more nuanced and complex early history of mankind in the Western Hemisphere than existed before.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jinh_a_00904

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The routes we identified suggest potential target areas for archaeological prospection by pinpointing the regions that humans would have frequently traversed and where archaeological material would have likely accumulated.

    “The routes we identified also suggest potential target areas for archaeological prospection by pinpointing the regions that humans would have frequently traversed and where archaeological material would have likely accumulated 71 .”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1126/science.1137166 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Malaspinas Anna-Sapfo, 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 6454
  3. 10.1126/science.1153569 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1086/423452 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/evan.10048 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.175920 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0047-2484(91)90107-7 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/1096-8644(200102)114:2<146::AID-AJPA1014>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  9. Harvati Katerina, 2011, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 442
  10. Nichols Johanna, 1999, Language, 475
  11. 10.2307/2845322 · DOI
  12. 10.1006/jaar.1998.0328 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003199 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2307/2694807 · DOI
  15. Hays Jody, 2005, PLoS Biology, e193
  16. Seielstad Mark, 2000, American Journal of Human Genetics, 1064
  17. 10.1080/15564890701628612 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1023/A:1009400309773 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/279189 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.2307/2803034 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1353/hub.2004.0019 · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030185 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00116-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/S0003598X00050845 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Dillehay Tom D., 2015, Quaternary Geochronology, 1
  27. 10.1353/hub.2002.0022 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/ajpa.10236 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/jhg.2014.35 · DOI
  30. Wang, 2007, PLoS Genetics, 2049
  31. 10.1093/molbev/msm225 · DOI
  32. 10.1086/320601 · DOI
  33. 10.1086/592436 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/15564894.2014.940096 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.272.5260.373 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.41 · DOI
  37. Guidon Niéde, 2003, Quaternary Science Reviews, 2303
  38. Kipnis Reanto, 1998, Antiquity, 584
  39. 10.1016/j.jchb.2008.04.005 · DOI
  40. Bandeira Arkley Marques, 2009, Amazônica-Revista de Antropologia, 486
  41. 2004, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 692
  42. 10.1016/j.jchb.2004.10.001 · DOI
  43. DeBlasis Paulo, 2007, Arqueologia Sul-Americana, 29
  44. Gustavo Wagner, 2011, Quaternary International, 53
  45. 10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00021-9 · DOI
  46. de Oliveira Jorge Eremites, 1999, Revista USP, 157
  47. 10.1179/0093469012Z.00000000012 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1017/S0003598X00099373 · DOI
  49. 10.2307/971989 · DOI
  50. 10.1073/pnas.0908925107 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.016 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.3406/hom.1993.369640 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1126/science.1086112 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1017/S0003598X00087056 · DOI
  56. Denevan William M., 1992, The Native Population of the Americas in, 1492, 218
  57. Ubelaker Douglas H., 1988, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 291

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Klein, H. S.
Venue
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History
Published
2016-02
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
543-561
ISSN
  • 0022-1953
  • 1530-9169
Cited by
4
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review