Cited by 439Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHallucinations in medical conditionsNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hearing in the Mind's Ear: A PET Investigation of Musical Imagery and Perception

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies have suggested that imagery processes may be mediated by neuronal mechanisms similar to those used in perception. To test this hypothesis, and to explore the neural basis for song imagery, 12 normal subjects were scanned using the water bolus method to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF) during the performance of three tasks. In the control condition subjects saw pairs of words on each trial and judged which word was longer. In the perceptual condition subjects also viewed pairs of words, this time drawn from a familiar song; simultaneously they heard the corresponding song, and their task was to judge the change in pitch of the two cued words within the song. In the imagery condition, subjects performed precisely the same judgment as in the perceptual condition, but with no auditory input. Thus, to perform the imagery task correctly an internal auditory representation must be accessed. Paired-image subtraction of the resulting pattern of CBF, together with matched MRI for anatomical localization, revealed that both perceptual and imagery. tasks produced similar patterns of CBF changes, as compared to the control condition, in keeping with the hypothesis. More specifically, both perceiving and imagining songs are associated with bilateral neuronal activity in the secondary auditory cortices, suggesting that processes within these regions underlie the phenomenological impression of imagined sounds. Other CBF foci elicited in both tasks include areas in…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.1.29

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Evans A. C ., 1992, Neuroiinage, 43
  2. Haxby J. V., 1994, Abstracts, 20, 433
  3. Perry D. W.., 1993, Alxtructs, 19, 843
  4. Podgomy, 1978, Journal c f l E.uperinzental Psytsc3olog):II u m n n Perception and Pet$)rmunce, 4, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–438 of 438

Metadata

Authors
Zatorre, R. J., Halpern, A. R., Perry, D. W., Meyer, E., & Evans, A. C.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Bucknell University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
29-46
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2118136160
Cited by
439
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bucknell Digital Commons (Bucknell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
musical imagery, auditory imagery, song perception, cerebral blood flow, secondary auditory cortex, supplementary motor area, thalamus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review