Cited by 1,230Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionNeural dynamics and brain function

THE BRAIN’S RECORD OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL EXPERIENCE: A FINAL SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

PENFIELD, WILDER, PEROT, PHANOR·1963·Brain

Abstract

WILDER PENFIELD, PHANOR PEROT; THE BRAIN’S RECORD OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL EXPERIENCE1: A FINAL SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION, Brain, Volume 86, Issue 4, 1 December

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/86.4.595

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stimulation of the most anterior aspects of the PFC (whether medial or lateral) almost never affects conscious experience.

    “This study provided a large-scale, quantitative confirmation of a conclusion already evident from qualitative assessments of the iES literature (Penfield and Perot, 1963;Selimbeyoglu and Parvizi, 2010): stimulation of the most anterior aspects of the PFC (whether medial or lateral) almost never affects conscious experience.”
  • The highest prevalence of bodily self disturbances was found in the parietal cortex (primary somatosensory cortex: 27.3%) and temporo-insular cortex (24%), whereas the lowest prevalence was found for early whole-brain or temporal cortex mapping by Penfield and colleagues (0.1%−1.8%).

    “The highest prevalence was found in the parietal cortex (primary somatosensory cortex: 27.3%; Sun, Zhang, Yu, et al., 2021) and temporo‐insular cortex (24%; Isnard et al., 2004), whereas the lowest prevalence was found for early whole‐brain or temporal cortex mapping by Penfield and colleagues (0.1%−1.8%; Penfield & Perot, 1963; Penfield, 1947, 1955, 1957).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PENFIELD, W., & PEROT, P.
Venue
Brain
Published
1963
Volume
86
Issue
4
Pages
595-696
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W1937144007
Cited by
1,230
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 40
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
auditory memory, visual memory, auditory experience, visual experience
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Brain, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Epilepsy, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Hallucinations, Hearing, Humans, Illusions, Neurosurgery, Physiology, Temporal Lobe, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review