Cited by 306Face Recognition and PerceptionCultural Differences and ValuesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Cultural Specificity in Amygdala Response to Fear Faces

Chiao, Joan Y., Iidaka, Tetsuya, Gordon, Heather L., Nogawa, Junpei, Bar, Moshe, Aminoff, Elissa, Sadato, Norihiro, Ambady, Nalini·2008·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The human amygdala robustly activates to fear faces. Heightened response to fear faces is thought to reflect the amygdala's adaptive function as an early warning mechanism. Although culture shapes several facets of emotional and social experience, including how fear is perceived and expressed to others, very little is known about how culture influences neural responses to fear stimuli. Here we show that the bilateral amygdala response to fear faces is modulated by culture. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure amygdala response to fear and nonfear faces in two distinct cultures. Native Japanese in Japan and Caucasians in the United States showed greater amygdala activation to fear expressed by members of their own cultural group. This finding provides novel and surprising evidence of cultural tuning in an automatic neural response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2008.20151

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adams and colleagues showed that amygdala activation to a fear face depends on both gaze and group membership, responding especially strongly to an ingroup fear face of averted gaze and an outgroup fear face of direct gaze.

    “Adams and colleagues (in press) showed that the amygdala activation to a fear face depends on both gaze and group membership of the stimulus face.In particular, the amygdala responds especially strongly to an ingroup fear face of averted gaze (indicative of a common threat in the direction of the gaze) and an outgroup fear face of direct gaze (indicative of a potential threat to the self) (see”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiao, J. Y., Iidaka, T., Gordon, H. L., Nogawa, J., Bar, M., Aminoff, E., Sadato, N., & Ambady, N.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (US)
  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences (JP)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2008-12-01
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
2167-2174
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2133894304
Cited by
306
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070833)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS050615, R01NS050615)
  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
amygdala, fearful faces, cultural specificity, cross-cultural comparison, facial expression perception, intergroup threat
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Face, Fear, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review