Cited by 377Action Observation and SynchronizationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation

Mathur, Vani A., Harada, Tokiko, Lipke, Trixie, Chiao, Joan Y.·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

A central evolutionary challenge for social groups is uniting a heterogeneous set of individuals towards common goals. One means by which social groups form and endure is by endowing group members with extraordinary prosocial proclivities, such as ingroup love, towards other group members. Here we examined the neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Our results indicate that empathy for ingroup members is neurally distinct from empathy for humankind, more generally. People showed greater response within anterior cingulate cortex and bilateral insula when observing the suffering of others, but African-American individuals additionally recruit medial prefrontal cortex when observing the suffering of members of their own social group. Moreover, neural activity within medial prefrontal cortex in response to pain expressed by ingroup relative to outgroup members predicted greater empathy and altruistic motivation for one's ingroup, suggesting that neurocognitive processes associated with self identity underlie extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation for members of one's own social group. Taken together, our findings reveal distinct neural mechanisms of empathy and altruistic motivation in an intergroup context and may serve as a foundation for future research investigating the neural bases of intergroup prosociality, more broadly construed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mPFC activity in response to perceived pain is associated with decisions to help ingroup members.

    “In addition, the mPFC activity in response to perceived pain is associated with decisions to help ingroup members (Hein et al., 2010; Mathur et al., 2010)”

    From A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict (2020) · cites this paper as Mathur et al., 2010

  • The context of intergroup conflict may shift the key function of the oxytocinergic system from mediating ingroup love to facilitating outgroup hate.

    “Although previous studies have demonstrated the role of OT and mPFC activity in altruistic decisions favoring the ingroup (De Dreu et al., 2010; Mathur et al., 2010; De Dreu et al., 2011), our results suggest that the context of intergroup conflict may shift the key function of the oxytocinergic system from mediating ingroup love (a desire to help the ingroup) to facilitating outgroup hate (an Agg”

    From A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict (2020) · cites this paper as Mathur et al., 2010

  • The mPFC is well-known for its functional role in representing mental states, social emotion, and group identity.

    “The mPFC is well-known for its functional role in representing mental states (Amodio and Frith, 2006), social emotion (Harris and Fiske, 2007; Mathur et al., 2010), and group identity (Volz et al., 2009; Molenberghs and Morrison, 2014).”

    From A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict (2020) · cites this paper as Mathur et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., Lipke, T., & Chiao, J. Y.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Chiao, Joan Y.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
1468-1475
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972224334
Cited by
377
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
39.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (BCS-0720312, BCS-0722326)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
empathy, altruistic motivation, in-group favoritism, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, medial prefrontal cortex, racial differences, self-identity, pain perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Altruism, Behavior, Black or African American, Brain, Empathy, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Regression Analysis, Software, Stress, Psychological, Prefrontal Cortex, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review