Cited by 72Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

The amygdala and development of the social brain

SKUSE, DAVID, MORRIS, JOHN, LAWRENCE, KATE·2003·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The amygdala comprises part of an extended network of neural circuits that are critically involved in the processing of socially salient stimuli. Such stimuli may be explicitly social, such as facial expressions, or they may be only tangentially social, such as abstract shapes moving with apparent intention relative to one another. The coordinated interplay between neural activity in the amygdala and other brain regions, especially the medial prefrontal cortex, the occipitofrontal cortex, the fusiform gyrus, and the superior temporal sulcus, allows us to develop social responses and to engage in social behaviors appropriate to our species. The harmonious functioning of this integrated social cognitive network may be disrupted by congenital or acquired lesions, by genetic anomalies, and by exceptional early experiences. Each form of disruption is associated with a slightly different outcome, dependent on the timing of the experience, the location of the lesion, or the nature of the genetic anomaly. Studies in both humans and primates concur; the dysregulation of basic emotions, especially the processing of fear and anger, is an almost invariable consequence of such disruption. These, in turn, have direct or indirect consequences for social behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1301.010

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SKUSE, D., MORRIS, J., & LAWRENCE, K.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
SKUSE, DAVID
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12
Volume
1008
Issue
1
Pages
91-101
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1975935425
Cited by
72
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
amygdala, social brain, social cognition, social behavior development, facial expression processing, social attention, medial prefrontal cortex, fusiform gyrus, superior temporal sulcus, emotional dysregulation, fear processing, brain lesions, genetic abnormalities, early life experience, primates
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Cognition Disorders, Cues, Facial Expression, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Occipital Lobe, Perceptual Disorders, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Turner Syndrome, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Chromosomes, Human, X

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review