Cited by 363Social and Intergroup PsychologyFace Recognition and PerceptionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals

Lieberman, Matthew D, Hariri, Ahmad, Jarcho, Johanna M, Eisenberger, Naomi I, Bookheimer, Susan Y·2005·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine the nature of amygdala sensitivity to race. Both African-American and Caucasian-American individuals showed greater amygdala activity to African-American targets than to Caucasian-American targets, suggesting that race-related amygdala activity may result from cultural learning rather than from the novelty of other races. Additionally, verbal encoding of African-American targets produced significantly less amygdala activity than perceptual encoding of African-American targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1465

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • White participants viewing faces of unknown black people show increased amygdala activity.

    “Phelps et al (2000) found increased amygdala activity when white participants viewed faces of unknown black people, a finding confirmed by other studies (Amodio 2003; Lieberman et al. 2005; Wheeler and Fiske 2005).”

    From Propranolol reduces implicit negative racial bias (2012) · cites this paper as Lieberman et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lieberman, M. D., Hariri, A., Jarcho, J. M., Eisenberger, N. I., & Bookheimer, S. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Lieberman, Matthew D
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2005-05-08
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
720-722
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2014595604
Cited by
362
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
FWCI
77.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH066709, MH66709)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR08655, P41RR013642, RR12169, RR 13642, C06RR012169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
racial bias, amygdala, cultural learning, face perception, verbal encoding, perceptual coding, racial classification, intergroup perception
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Auditory Perception, Black or African American, Brain Mapping, Culture, Emotions, Face, Fear, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Race Relations, Verbal Behavior, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review