Cited by 288Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Prediction during natural language comprehension

Open access
Willems, Roel M., Frank, Stefan L., Nijhof, Annabel D., Hagoort, Peter, van den Bosch, Antal·2016·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

The notion of prediction is studied in cognitive neuroscience with increasing intensity. We investigated the neural basis of 2 distinct aspects of word prediction, derived from information theory, during story comprehension. We assessed the effect of entropy of next-word probability distributions as well as surprisal A computational model determined entropy and surprisal for each word in 3 literary stories. Twenty-four healthy participants listened to the same 3 stories while their brain activation was measured using fMRI. Reversed speech fragments were presented as a control condition. Brain areas sensitive to entropy were left ventral premotor cortex, left middle frontal gyrus, right inferior frontal gyrus, left inferior parietal lobule, and left supplementary motor area. Areas sensitive to surprisal were left inferior temporal sulcus ("visual word form area"), bilateral superior temporal gyrus, right amygdala, bilateral anterior temporal poles, and right inferior frontal sulcus. We conclude that prediction during language comprehension can occur at several levels of processing, including at the level of word form. Our study exemplifies the power of combining computational linguistics with cognitive neuroscience, and additionally underlines the feasibility of studying continuous spoken language materials with fMRI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhv075

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hagoort P, Baggio G, Willems RM. 2009. Semantic uni fi cation. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences IV. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
  2. Hale JT. 2001. A probabilistic early parser as a psycholinguistic model. In: Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Pittsburgh, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. p. 159 -166.
  3. Willems RM (ed.). 2015. Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willems, R. M., Frank, S. L., Nijhof, A. D., Hagoort, P., & van den Bosch, A.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (NL)
Corresponding author
Willems, Roel M.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2015-04-22
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
2506-2516
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W1969221307
Cited by
288
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (334028)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
word prediction, natural language understanding, entropy (information theory), information content, narrative comprehension, ventral premotor cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, visual word form area, amygdala, computational models of language, spoken language processing
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Speech Perception, Comprehension, Young Adult, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review