The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sense of Presence within Auditory Virtual Environments
Abstract
Two studies were performed to investigate the sense of presence within stereoscopic virtual environments as a function of the addition or absence of auditory cues. The first study examined the presence or absence of spatialized sound, while the second study compared the use of nonspatialized sound to spatialized sound. Sixteen subjects were allowed to navigate freely throughout several virtual environments and for each virtual environment, their level of presence, the virtual world realism, and interactivity between the participant and virtual environment were evaluated using survey questions. The results indicated that the addition of spatialized sound significantly increased the sense of presence but not the realism of the virtual environment. Despite this outcome, the addition of a spatialized sound source significantly increased the realism with which the subjects interacted with the sound source, and significantly increased the sense that sounds emanated from specific locations within the virtual environment. The results suggest that, in the context of a navigation task, while presence in virtual environments can be improved by the addition of auditory cues, the perceived realism of a virtual environment may be influenced more by changes in the visual rather than auditory display media. Implications of these results for presence within auditory virtual environments are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603 · Cited by 3,034
Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence
Sheridan, T. B. (1992) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120 · Cited by 1,344
Presence within Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual Display Parameters
Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1996) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1996.5.3.274 · Cited by 331
Self-citationWhite, B. W., Saunders, F. A., Scadden, L., Bach-Y-Rita, P., & Collins, C. C. (1970) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03210126 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603 · Cited by 3,034
From presence to consciousness through virtual reality.
Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1651 · Cited by 1,831
How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence
Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740 · Cited by 1,749
A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474601300343612 · Cited by 1,208
A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences
Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., Saari, T., Laarni, J., Ravaja, N., Gouveia, F. R., et al. (2007) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260701283079 · Cited by 893
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W.
- Venue
- Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 290-301
- ISSN
- 1054-7460 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W124275677
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sense of Presence within Auditory Virtual Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/pres.1996.5.3.290
- The paper
- Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1996). The Sense of Presence within Auditory Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1996.5.3.290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.