Cited by 74Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAdvanced Optical Imaging TechnologiesSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Effects of Stereoscopic Viewing on Presence, Anxiety, and Cybersickness in a Virtual Reality Environment for Public Speaking

Ling, Yun, Brinkman, Willem-Paul, Nefs, Harold T., Qu, Chao, Heynderickx, Ingrid·2012·Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Abstract

In this study, we addressed the effect of stereoscopy on presence, anxiety, and cybersickness in a virtual public speaking world, and investigated the relationships between these three variables. Our results question the practical relevance of applying stereoscopy in head-mounted displays (HMDs) for virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) in a virtual public speaking world. In VRET, feelings of presence improve the efficacy (B. K. Wiederhold & M. D. Wiederhold, 2005). There are reports of a relatively large group of dropouts during VRET at low levels of presence in the virtual environment (Krijn, Emmelkamp, Olafsson, & Biemond, 2004). Therefore, generating an adequate level of presence is essential for the success of VRET. In this study, 86 participants were recruited and they were immersed in the virtual public speaking world twice: once with stereoscopic rendering and once without stereoscopic rendering. The results showed that spatial presence was significantly improved by adding stereoscopy, but no difference for reported involvement or realism was found. The heart rate measurements also showed no difference between stereoscopic and nonstereoscopic viewing. Participants reported similar anxiety feelings about their talk and similar level of cybersickness in both viewing modes. Even though spatial presence was significantly improved, the size of statistical effect was relatively small. Our results therefore suggest that stereoscopic rendering may not be of practical importance for VRET in public speaking settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/pres_a_00111

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ling, Y., Brinkman, W.-P., Nefs, H. T., Qu, C., & Heynderickx, I.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Venue
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2012-08
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
254-267
ISSN
1054-7460 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160586172
Cited by
74
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6
FWCI
11.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
stereoscopic viewing, virtual reality exposure therapy, public speaking anxiety, cybersickness, presence, spatial presence, head-mounted displays, heart rate, immersion, realism (computer graphics)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review