Cited by 320Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Treatment of acrophobia in virtual reality: The role of immersion and presence

Krijn, Merel, Emmelkamp, Paul M.G, Biemond, Roeline, de Wilde de Ligny, Claudius, Schuemie, Martijn J, van der Mast, Charles A.P.G·2004·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

In this study the effects of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) were investigated in patients with acrophobia. Feelings of presence in VRET were systematically varied by using either a head-mounted display (HMD) (low presence) or a computer automatic virtual environment (CAVE) (high presence). VRET in general was found to be more effective than no treatment. No differences were found in effectiveness between VRET using an HMD or CAVE. Results were maintained at 6 months follow-up. Results of VRET were comparable with those of exposure in vivo (Cyberpsychology and Behavior 4 (2001) 335). In treatment completers no relationship was found between presence and anxiety. Early drop-outs experienced less acrophobic complaints and psychopathology in general at pre-test. They also experienced less presence and anxiety in the virtual environment used in session one as compared to patients that completed VRET.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00139-6

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krijn, M., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Biemond, R., de Wilde de Ligny, C., Schuemie, M. J., & van der Mast, C. A. P. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Krijn, Merel
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
229-239
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101484768
Cited by
320
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
acrophobia, virtual reality exposure therapy, presence, immersion, head-mounted displays, caves, treatment outcomes, treatment discontinuation, anxiety, phobia treatment
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Computer Simulation, Conditioning, Psychological, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review