Cited by 390Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentHealth and Medical Studies

Prevalence of mental disorders and trends from 1996 to 2009. Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2

de Graaf, Ron, ten Have, Margreet, van Gool, Coen, van Dorsselaer, Saskia·2012·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective To present prevalences of lifetime and 12-month DSM-IV mood, anxiety, substance use and impulse-control disorders from the second Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS-2), and to compare the 12-month prevalence of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders with estimates from the first study (NEMESIS-1).Method Between November 2007 and July 2009, a nationally representative face-to-face survey was conducted using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0 among 6,646 subjects aged 18-64. Trends in 12-month prevalence of mental disorders were examined with these data and NEMESIS-1 data from 1996 (n = 7,076).Results Lifetime prevalence estimates in NEMESIS-2 were 20.2% for mood, 19.6% for anxiety, 19.1% for substance use disorder and 9.2% for impulse-control disorder. For 12-month disorders, these figures were 6.1, 10.1, 5.6 and 2.1%, respectively. Between 1996 and 2007-2009, the 12-month prevalence of anxiety and substance use disorder did not change. The prevalence of mood disorder decreased slightly but lost significance after controlling for differences in sociodemographic variables between the two studies.Conclusion This study shows that in the Netherlands mental disorders are prevalent. In about a decade, no clear change in mental health status was found.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-010-0334-8

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Graaf, R., ten Have, M., van Gool, C., & van Dorsselaer, S.
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2011-01-01
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
203-213
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W1999364579
Cited by
390
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
19.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
mental illness, prevalence, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, impulse control disorders, lifetime prevalence, 12-month prevalence, temporal trends, Nemesis, Netherlands, sociodemographic differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence, Mood Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review