Cited by 668Respiratory Support and MechanismsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersInfectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis

Neuropsychological sequelae and impaired health status in survivors of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

HOPKINS, RAMONA O., WEAVER, LINDELL K., POPE, DONNA, ORME, JAMES F., BIGLER, ERIN D., LARSON-LOHR, VALERIE·1999·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a disease of acute respiratory failure manifested by severe hypoxemia with a high mortality rate. Previous outcome studies of ARDS have assessed survival and/or pulmonary function as the primary outcome variables. Cognitive or psychological outcomes following ARDS have not been described, despite the possibility that ARDS patients are at risk for brain injury through hypoxemia or other mechanisms. In the current study 55 consecutive ARDS survivors completed a battery of neuropsychological tests and questionnaires regarding health status, cognitive and psychological outcomes at the time of hospital discharge and 1 yr after onset of ARDS. At hospital discharge, 100% (55 of 55) of survivors exhibited cognitive and affective impairments, as well as problems with health status which affected their quality of life. At 1 yr after ARDS, 17 of 55 (30%) patients still exhibited generalized cognitive decline. Forty-three of 55 (78%) patients had all or at least one of the following: impaired memory, attention, concentration and/or decreased mental processing speed. One year after ARDS a substantial portion of ARDS survivors exhibit impaired health status and cognitive sequelae which may be due to hypoxemia, emboli, inflammation, drug toxicity, and/or other etiologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9708059

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HOPKINS, R. O., WEAVER, L. K., POPE, D., ORME, J. F., BIGLER, E. D., & LARSON-LOHR, V.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
160
Issue
1
Pages
50-56
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2071853044
Cited by
668
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-50513)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
Keywords
acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS survivors, neuropsychological sequelae, cognitive impairment, hypoxemia, brain injury, health status, quality of life, memory impairment, processing speed, affective impairment, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain Damage, Chronic, Hypoxia, Brain, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Quality of Life, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Risk Factors, Utah, Survival Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review