Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of the Berlin Definition for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Autopsy

Thille, Arnaud W., Esteban, Andrés, Fernández-Segoviano, Pilar, Rodriguez, José-Maria, Aramburu, José-Antonio, Peñuelas, Oscar, Cortés-Puch, Irene, Cardinal-Fernández, Pablo, Lorente, José A., Frutos-Vivar, Fernando·2013·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: A revised definition of clinical criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the Berlin definition, was recently established to classify patients according to their severity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of these clinical criteria using diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) at autopsy as the reference standard. METHODS: All patients who died and had a clinical autopsy in our intensive care unit over a 20-year period (1991-2010) were included. Patients with clinical criteria for ARDS were identified from the medical charts and were classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to the Berlin definition using PaO2/FiO2 oxygenation criteria. Microscopic analysis from each pulmonary lobe was performed by two pathologists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 712 autopsies analyzed, 356 patients had clinical criteria for ARDS at time of death, classified as mild (n = 49, 14%), moderate (n = 141, 40%), and severe (n = 166, 46%). Sensitivity was 89% and specificity 63% to identify ARDS using the Berlin definition. DAD was found in 159 of 356 (45%) patients with clinical criteria for ARDS (in 12, 40, and 58% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe ARDS, respectively). DAD was more frequent in patients who met clinical criteria for ARDS during more than 72 hours and was found in 69% of those with severe ARDS for 72 hours or longer. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathological findings were correlated to severity and duration of ARDS. Using clinical criteria the revised Berlin definition for ARDS allowed the identification of severe ARDS of more than 72 hours as a homogeneous group of patients characterized by a high proportion of DAD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201211-1981oc

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Thille, A. W., Esteban, A., Fernández-Segoviano, P., Rodriguez, J.-M., Aramburu, J.-A., Peñuelas, O., Cortés-Puch, I., Cardinal-Fernández, P., Lorente, J. A., & Frutos-Vivar, F.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
187
Issue
7
Pages
761-767
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2121048953
Cited by
431
References
29
FWCI
28.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the Berlin Definition for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Autopsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201211-1981oc
The paper
Thille, A. W., Esteban, A., Fernández-Segoviano, P., Rodriguez, J.-M., Aramburu, J.-A., Peñuelas, O., Cortés-Puch, I., Cardinal-Fernández, P., Lorente, J. A., & Frutos-Vivar, F. (2013). Comparison of the Berlin Definition for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Autopsy. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201211-1981oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.