Cited by 481COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

A systematic review of pathological findings in COVID-19: a pathophysiological timeline and possible mechanisms of disease progression

Open access
Polak, Samuel B., Van Gool, Inge C., Cohen, Danielle, von der Thüsen, Jan H., van Paassen, Judith·2020·Modern Pathology

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, much has been learned regarding its clinical course, prognostic inflammatory markers, disease complications, and mechanical ventilation strategy. Clinically, three stages have been identified based on viral infection, pulmonary involvement with inflammation, and fibrosis. Moreover, low and high elastance phenotypes can be distinguished in mechanically ventilated patients, based on lung mechanics, ventilation-to-perfusion ratio, and CT scans; these two phenotypes have presumed differences in their underlying pathophysiology. Although essential for therapeutic guidance, the pathophysiology of COVID-19 is poorly understood. Here, we systematically reviewed published case reports and case series in order to increase our understanding of COVID-19 pathophysiology by constructing a timeline and correlating histopathological findings with clinical stages of COVID-19. Using PRISMA-IPD guidelines, 42 articles reporting 198 individual cases were included in our analysis. In lung samples (n = 131 cases), we identified three main histological patterns: epithelial (n = 110, 85%), with reactive epithelial changes and DAD; vascular (n = 76, 59%) with microvascular damage, (micro)thrombi, and acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia; and fibrotic (n = 28, 22%) with interstitial fibrosis. The epithelial and vascular patterns can present in all stages of symptomatic COVID-19, whereas the fibrotic pattern presents starting at ~3 weeks. Moreover, patients can present with more than one pattern, either simultaneously or consecutively. These findings are consistent with knowledge regarding clinical patterns of viral infection, development of hyperinflammation and hypercoagulability, and fibrosis. Close collaboration among medical staff is necessary in order to translate this knowledge and classification of pathophysiological mechanisms into clinical stages of disease in individual patients. Moreover, further research, including histopathological studies, is warranted in order to develop reliable, clinically relevant biomarkers by correlating these pathological findings with laboratory results and radiological findings, thus, increasing our understanding of COVID-19 and facilitating the move to precision medicine for treating patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41379-020-0603-3

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Howick J, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A, Moschetti I, et al. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group*. “The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2”. 2016, May 1 [Internet] [cited April 22, 2020]: https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polak, S. B., Van Gool, I. C., Cohen, D., von der Thüsen, J. H., & van Paassen, J.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Modern Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
2128-2138
ISSN
0893-3952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036853141
Cited by
481
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 172 · 2020: 57
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, lung histopathology, disease progression, pulmonary fibrosis, acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia, diffuse alveolar damage, microvascular damage, blood clots, hyperinflammation, hypercoagulability, mechanical ventilation, disease staging, biomarkers, precision medicine
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Disease Progression, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review