Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 575

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complement C5a receptors and neutrophils mediate fetal injury in the antiphospholipid syndrome

Open access
Girardi, Guillermina, Berman, Jessica, Redecha, Patricia, Spruce, Lynn, Thurman, Joshua M., Kraus, Damian, Hollmann, Travis J., Casali, Paolo, Caroll, Michael C., Wetsel, Rick A., Lambris, John D., Holers, V. Michael, Salmon, Jane E.·2003·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by recurrent pregnancy loss and thrombosis in the presence of antiphospholipid (aPL) Ab's. Currently, therapy for pregnant women with APS is focused on preventing thrombosis, but anticoagulation is only partially successful in averting miscarriage. We hypothesized that complement activation is a central mechanism of pregnancy loss in APS and tested this in a model in which pregnant mice receive human IgG containing aPL Ab's. Here we identify complement component C5 (and particularly its cleavage product C5a) and neutrophils as key mediators of fetal injury, and we show that Ab's or peptides that block C5a-C5a receptor interactions prevent pregnancy complications. The fact that F(ab)'2 fragments of aPL Ab's do not mediate fetal injury and that C4-deficient mice are protected from fetal injury suggests that activation of the complement cascade is initiated via the classical pathway. Studies in factor B-deficient mice, however, indicate that alternative pathway activation is required and amplifies complement activation. In contrast, activating Fc gamma Rs do not play an important role in mediating aPL Ab-induced fetal injury. Our findings identify the key innate immune effectors engaged by pathogenic autoantibodies that mediate poor pregnancy outcomes in APS and provide novel and important targets for prevention of pregnancy loss in APS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci18817

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Wilson, 1999, Arthritis Rheum., 42, 1309, 10.1002/1529-0131(199907)42:7<1309::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-F · doi:10.1002/1529-0131(199907)42:7<1309::aid-anr1>3.0.co;2-f
  2. Kutteh, 1996, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 174, 1584, 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70610-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rai, 1997, Br. Med. J., 314, 253, 10.1136/bmj.314.7076.253 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Clifford, 1994, Hum. Reprod., 9, 1328, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138703 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Stephenson, 1994, Fertil. Steril., 66, 24
  6. Yetman, 1996, Fertil. Steril., 66, 540, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58565-3 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Branch, 1990, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 163, 210, 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90700-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Piona, 1995, Scand. J. Immunol., 41, 427, 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1995.tb03588.x · DOI
  9. Blank, 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 88, 3069, 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3069 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ikematsu, 1998, Arthritis Rheum., 41, 1026, 10.1002/1529-0131(199806)41:6<1026::AID-ART9>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  11. Simantov, 1995, J. Clin. Invest., 96, 2211, 10.1172/JCI118276 · DOI · Paper page
  12. di Simone, 2000, Arthritis Rheum., 43, 140, 10.1002/1529-0131(200001)43:1<140::AID-ANR18>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI · Paper page
  13. Pierangeli, 1999, Circulation., 99, 1997, 10.1161/01.CIR.99.15.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rand, 1997, N. Engl. J. Med., 337, 154, 10.1056/NEJM199707173370303 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wetsel, 1995, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 7, 48, 10.1016/0952-7915(95)80028-X · DOI · Paper page
  16. Shin, 1996, Biomembranes., 4, 123
  17. Holers, 2002, J. Exp. Med., 195, 211, 10.1084/jem.200116116 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Takai, 1994, Cell., 76, 519, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90115-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fischer, 1996, J. Immunol., 157, 549, 10.4049/jimmunol.157.2.549 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Matsumoto, 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 94, 8720, 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8720 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Li, 2000, Eur. J. Immunol., 30, 2015, 10.1002/1521-4141(200007)30:7<2015::AID-IMMU2015>3.0.CO;2-5 · doi:10.1002/1521-4141(200007)30:7<2015::aid-immu2015>3.0.co;2-5
  22. Ikematsu, 1993, J. Immunol., 150, 1325, 10.4049/jimmunol.150.4.1325 · DOI
  23. Ikematsu, 1998, J. Immunol., 161, 2895, 10.4049/jimmunol.161.6.2895 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.161.6.2895
  24. Frei, 1987, Mol. Cell Probes., 1, 141, 10.1016/0890-8508(87)90022-3 · DOI
  25. Finch, 1999, J. Med. Chem., 42, 1965, 10.1021/jm9806594 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Mastellos, 2001, J. Immunol., 166, 2479, 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2479 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hestdal, 1991, J. Immunol., 147, 22, 10.4049/jimmunol.147.1.22 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lagasse, 1996, J. Immunol. Methods., 197, 139, 10.1016/0022-1759(96)00138-X · DOI · Paper page
  29. Conlan, 1994, J. Exp. Med., 179, 259, 10.1084/jem.179.1.259 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Foley, 1993, Eur. J. Immunol., 23, 1381, 10.1002/eji.1830230630 · DOI
  31. Ravetch, 1998, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 16, 421, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.421 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Quigg, 2002, Trends Mol. Med., 8, 430, 10.1016/S1471-4914(02)02386-9 · DOI
  33. Tesser, 2001, Arthritis Rheum., 44, S274
  34. Wang, 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 92, 8955, 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8955 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Strachan, 2000, J. Immunol., 164, 6560, 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6560 · DOI
  36. Arumugam, 2003, Kidney Int., 63, 134, 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00737.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Grant, 2002, J. Exp. Med., 196, 1461, 10.1084/jem.20020205 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Clark, 1998, J. Immunol., 160, 545, 10.4049/jimmunol.160.2.545 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Schwaeble, 1999, Immunol. Today., 20, 17, 10.1016/S0167-5699(98)01376-0 · DOI
  40. Huber-Lang, 2002, Am. J. Pathol., 161, 1849, 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64461-6 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Chen, 2001, J. Clin. Invest., 108, 1151, 10.1172/JCI11494 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Lee, 2002, Science., 297, 1689, 10.1126/science.1073176 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Wipke, 2001, J. Immunol., 167, 1601, 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1601 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Ji, 2002, Immunity., 16, 157, 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00275-3 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Czermak, 1999, J. Immunol., 162, 2321, 10.4049/jimmunol.162.4.2321 · DOI
  46. Laudes, 2002, J. Immunol., 169, 5962, 10.4049/jimmunol.169.10.5962 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Haviland, 1995, J. Immunol., 154, 1861, 10.4049/jimmunol.154.4.1861 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Wojta, 2002, Blood., 100, 517, 10.1182/blood.V100.2.517 · DOI
  49. Kondo, 2001, Clin. Exp. Immunol., 124, 323, 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01513.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01513.x
  50. Mevorach, 1998, J. Exp. Med., 188, 2313, 10.1084/jem.188.12.2313 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Hietala, 2002, J. Immunol., 169, 454, 10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.454 · DOI
  52. Wang, 2000, J. Immunol., 164, 4340, 10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.4340 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 575

Metadata

Authors
Girardi, G., Berman, J., Redecha, P., Spruce, L., Thurman, J. M., Kraus, D., Hollmann, T. J., Casali, P., Caroll, M. C., Wetsel, R. A., Lambris, J. D., Holers, V. M., & Salmon, J. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
112
Issue
11
Pages
1644-1654
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140865695
Cited by
575
References
3
FWCI
16.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complement C5a receptors and neutrophils mediate fetal injury in the antiphospholipid syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci18817
The paper
Girardi, G., Berman, J., Redecha, P., Spruce, L., Thurman, J. M., Kraus, D., Hollmann, T. J., Casali, P., Caroll, M. C., Wetsel, R. A., Lambris, J. D., Holers, V. M., & Salmon, J. E. (2003). Complement C5a receptors and neutrophils mediate fetal injury in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci18817

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.