Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Annexin A1, formyl peptide receptor, and NOX1 orchestrate epithelial repair

Open access
Leoni, Giovanna, Alam, Ashfaqul, Neumann, Philipp-Alexander, Lambeth, J. David, Cheng, Guangjie, McCoy, James, Hilgarth, Roland S., Kundu, Kousik, Murthy, Niren, Kusters, Dennis, Reutelingsperger, Chris, Perretti, Mauro, Parkos, Charles A., Neish, Andrew S., Nusrat, Asma·2013·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

N-formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are critical regulators of host defense in phagocytes and are also expressed in epithelia. FPR signaling and function have been extensively studied in phagocytes, yet their functional biology in epithelia is poorly understood. We describe a novel intestinal epithelial FPR signaling pathway that is activated by an endogenous FPR ligand, annexin A1 (ANXA1), and its cleavage product Ac2-26, which mediate activation of ROS by an epithelial NADPH oxidase, NOX1. We show that epithelial cell migration was regulated by this signaling cascade through oxidative inactivation of the regulatory phosphatases PTEN and PTP-PEST, with consequent activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and paxillin. In vivo studies using intestinal epithelial specific Nox1(-/-IEC) and AnxA1(-/-) mice demonstrated defects in intestinal mucosal wound repair, while systemic administration of ANXA1 promoted wound recovery in a NOX1-dependent fashion. Additionally, increased ANXA1 expression was observed in the intestinal epithelium and infiltrating leukocytes in the mucosa of ulcerative colitis patients compared with normal intestinal mucosa. Our findings delineate a novel epithelial FPR1/NOX1-dependent redox signaling pathway that promotes mucosal wound repair.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci65831

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Leoni, G., Alam, A., Neumann, P.-A., Lambeth, J. D., Cheng, G., McCoy, J., Hilgarth, R. S., Kundu, K., Murthy, N., Kusters, D., Reutelingsperger, C., Perretti, M., Parkos, C. A., Neish, A. S., & Nusrat, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2012-12-17
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
443-454
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146314181
Cited by
295
References
89
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annexin A1, formyl peptide receptor, and NOX1 orchestrate epithelial repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci65831
The paper
Leoni, G., Alam, A., Neumann, P.-A., Lambeth, J. D., Cheng, G., McCoy, J., Hilgarth, R. S., Kundu, K., Murthy, N., Kusters, D., Reutelingsperger, C., Perretti, M., Parkos, C. A., Neish, A. S., & Nusrat, A. (2013). Annexin A1, formyl peptide receptor, and NOX1 orchestrate epithelial repair. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci65831

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.