Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective isolation of NKX2-1–expressing human lung progenitors derived from pluripotent stem cells

Open access
Hawkins, Finn, Kramer, Philipp, Jacob, Anjali, Driver, Ian, Thomas, Dylan C., McCauley, Katherine B., Skvir, Nicholas, Crane, Ana M., Kurmann, Anita A., Hollenberg, Anthony N., Nguyen, Sinead, Wong, Brandon G., Khalil, Ahmad S., Huang, Sarah X.L., Guttentag, Susan, Rock, Jason R., Shannon, John M., Davis, Brian R., Kotton, Darrell N.·2017·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

It has been postulated that during human fetal development, all cells of the lung epithelium derive from embryonic, endodermal, NK2 homeobox 1-expressing (NKX2-1+) precursor cells. However, this hypothesis has not been formally tested owing to an inability to purify or track these progenitors for detailed characterization. Here we have engineered and developmentally differentiated NKX2-1GFP reporter pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) in vitro to generate and isolate human primordial lung progenitors that express NKX2-1 but are initially devoid of differentiated lung lineage markers. After sorting to purity, these primordial lung progenitors exhibited lung epithelial maturation. In the absence of mesenchymal coculture support, this NKX2-1+ population was able to generate epithelial-only spheroids in defined 3D cultures. Alternatively, when recombined with fetal mouse lung mesenchyme, the cells recapitulated epithelial-mesenchymal developing lung interactions. We imaged these progenitors in real time and performed time-series global transcriptomic profiling and single-cell RNA sequencing as they moved through the earliest moments of lung lineage specification. The profiles indicated that evolutionarily conserved, stage-dependent gene signatures of early lung development are expressed in primordial human lung progenitors and revealed a CD47hiCD26lo cell surface phenotype that allows their prospective isolation from untargeted, patient-specific PSCs for further in vitro differentiation and future applications in regenerative medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci89950

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Hawkins, F., Kramer, P., Jacob, A., Driver, I., Thomas, D. C., McCauley, K. B., Skvir, N., Crane, A. M., Kurmann, A. A., Hollenberg, A. N., Nguyen, S., Wong, B. G., Khalil, A. S., Huang, S. X. L., Guttentag, S., Rock, J. R., Shannon, J. M., Davis, B. R., & Kotton, D. N.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2017-05-02
Volume
127
Issue
6
Pages
2277-2294
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2611660641
Cited by
239
References
6
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective isolation of NKX2-1–expressing human lung progenitors derived from pluripotent stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci89950
The paper
Hawkins, F., Kramer, P., Jacob, A., Driver, I., Thomas, D. C., McCauley, K. B., Skvir, N., Crane, A. M., Kurmann, A. A., Hollenberg, A. N., Nguyen, S., Wong, B. G., Khalil, A. S., Huang, S. X. L., Guttentag, S., Rock, J. R., Shannon, J. M., Davis, B. R., & Kotton, D. N. (2017). Prospective isolation of NKX2-1–expressing human lung progenitors derived from pluripotent stem cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci89950

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.