Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dimensions of Religiosity and Their Relationship to Lifetime Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders

Kendler, Kenneth S., Liu, Xiao-Qing, Gardner, Charles O., McCullough, Michael E., Larson, David, Prescott, Carol A.·2003·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The role of religion in mental illness remains understudied. Most prior investigations of this relationship have used measures of religiosity that do not reflect its complexity and/or have examined a small number of psychiatric outcomes. This study used data from a general population sample to clarify the dimensions of religiosity and the relationships of these dimensions to risk for lifetime psychiatric and substance use disorders. METHOD: Responses to 78 items assessing various aspects of broadly defined religiosity were obtained from 2,616 male and female twins from a general population registry. The association between the resulting religiosity dimensions and the lifetime risk for nine disorders assessed at personal interview was evaluated by logistic regression. Of these disorders, five were "internalizing" (major depression, phobias, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and bulimia nervosa), and four were "externalizing" (nicotine dependence, alcohol dependence, drug abuse or dependence, and adult antisocial behavior). RESULTS: Seven factors were identified: general religiosity, social religiosity, involved God, forgiveness, God as judge, unvengefulness, and thankfulness. Two factors were associated with reduced risk for both internalizing and externalizing disorders (social religiosity and thankfulness), four factors with reduced risk for externalizing disorders only (general religiosity, involved God, forgiveness, and God as judge), and one factor with reduced risk for internalizing disorders only (unvengefulness). CONCLUSIONS: Religiosity is a complex, multidimensional construct with substantial associations with lifetime psychopathology. Some dimensions of religiosity are related to reduced risk specifically for internalizing disorders, and others to reduced risk specifically for externalizing disorders, while still others are less specific in their associations. These results do not address the nature of the causal link between religiosity and risk for illness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.3.496

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Koenig HG, Idler E, Kasl SV: Religion, spirituality, and medicine: a rebuttal to skeptics. Int J Psychiatry Med 1999; 29:123-131 · DOI
  2. Mathews DA, McCullough ME, Larson DB, Koenig HG, Swyers JP, Milano MG: Religious commitment and health status: a review of the research and implications for family medicine. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7:118-124 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sloan RP, Bagiella E, Powell T: Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet 1999; 353:664-667 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kendler KS, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ: Generalized anxiety disorder in women: a population-based twin study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49:267-272 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lewine R, Burbach D, Meltzer HY: Effect of diagnostic criteria on the ratio of male to female schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry 1984; 141:84-87 · DOI
  6. Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Prescott CA: Panic syndromes in a population-based sample of male and female twins. Psychol Med 2001; 31:989-1000 · DOI
  7. Kendler KS, Myers J, Prescott CA, Neale JM: The genetic epidemiology of irrational fears and phobias in men. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58:257-265 · DOI
  8. Little TD, Lindenberger U, Nesselroade JR: On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: when “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychol Methods 2002; 4:192-211 · DOI · Paper page
  9. D’Onofrio B, Murrelle L, Eaves LJ, McCullough ME, Landis JL, Maes H: Adolescent religiousness and its influence on substance use: preliminary findings from the Mid-Atlantic School Age Twin Study. Twin Res 1999; 2:156-168 · DOI
  10. Strayhorn JM, Weidman CS, Larson DB: A measure of religiousness and its relation to parent and child mental health variables. J Community Psychol 1990; 18:34-43 · DOI
  11. Hertel BR, Donahue MJ: Parental influences on god images among children: testing Durkheim’s metaphoric parallelism. J Sci Study Relig 1995; 34:186-199 · DOI
  12. Mauger PA, Perry JE, Freeman T, Grove DC, McBride AG, McKinney KE: The measurement of forgiveness: preliminary research. J Psychol and Christianity 1992; 11:170-180 · DOI
  13. Cohen J: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychol Measurement 1960; 20:37-46 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fleiss JL, Cohen J: The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychol Measurement 1973; 33:613-619 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Derogatis LR, Serio JC, Cleary PA: An empirical comparison of three indices of factorial similarity. Psychol Rep 1972; 30:791-804 · DOI
  16. Feild HS, Armenakis AA: On use of multiple tests of significance in psychological research. Psychol Rep 1974; 35:427-431 · DOI
  17. Gorsuch RL: Religious aspects of substance abuse and recovery. J Soc Issues 1995; 5:65-83 · DOI
  18. Koenig HG, George LK, Meador KG, Blazer DG: Religious practices and alcoholism in a Southern adult population. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1994; 45:225-231 · DOI
  19. Larson DB, Wilson WP: Religious life of alcoholics. South Med J 1980; 73:723-727 · DOI
  20. Payne IR, Bergin AE, Bielema KA, Jenkins PH: Review of religion and mental health: prevention and enhancement of psychosocial functioning. Prev Hum Serv 1991; 9:11-40 · DOI
  21. McCullough ME, Larson DB: Religion and depression: a review of the literature. Twin Res 2001; 2:126-136 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Koenig HG, Ford SM, George LK, Blazer DG, Meador KG: Religion and anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord 1993; 7:321-342 · DOI
  23. Ahmed F, Brown DR, Gary LE, Saadatmand F: Religious predictors of cigarette smoking: findings for African American women of childbearing age. Behav Med 1994; 20:34-43 · DOI
  24. Evans TD, Cullen FT, Dunaway RG, Burton JVS: Religion and crime re-examined: the impact of religion, secular controls, and social ecology on adult criminology. Criminology 1995; 33:195-217 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Higgins PC, Albrecht GL: Hellfire and delinquency revisited. Soc Forces 1977; 55:952-958 · DOI
  26. Strawbridge WJ, Shema SJ, Cohen RD, Kaplan GA: Religious attendance increases survival by improving and maintaining good health behaviors, mental health, and social relationships. Ann Behav Med 2001; 23:68-74 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Kendler, K. S., Liu, X.-Q., Gardner, C. O., McCullough, M. E., Larson, D., & Prescott, C. A.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
160
Issue
3
Pages
496-503
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2096143087
Cited by
558
References
5
FWCI
18.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.