Cited by 188Treatment of Major DepressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Fluoxetine versus placebo in preventing relapse of major depression in children and adolescents

Open access
Emslie, Graham J., Kennard, Beth D., Mayes, Taryn L., Nightingale-Teresi, Jeanne, Carmody, Thomas, Hughes, Carroll W., Rush, A. John, Tao, Rongrong +1 more·2008·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The authors compared fluoxetine and placebo in continuation treatment to prevent relapse of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents. Method After a detailed evaluation, children and adolescents 7-18 years of age with major depressive disorder were treated openly with fluoxetine. Those who had an adequate response after 12 weeks, as indicated by a Clinical Global Impression improvement score of 1 or 2 and a decrease of at least 50% in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised score, were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine or placebo for an additional 6 months. The primary outcome measures were relapse and time to relapse. Relapse was defined as either a score of 40 or higher on the Children's Depression Rating Scale with a history of 2 weeks of clinical deterioration, or clinical deterioration as judged by the clinician. Additional analyses were conducted with relapse defined only as a score of 40 or higher on the Children's Depression Rating Scale. Results Of 168 participants enrolled in acute fluoxetine treatment, 102 were randomly assigned to continuation treatment with fluoxetine (N=50) or placebo (N=52). Of these, 21 participants (42.0%) in the fluoxetine group relapsed, compared with 36 (69.2%) in the placebo group, a significant difference. Similarly, under the stricter definition of relapse, fewer participants in the fluoxetine group relapsed (N=11; 22.0%) than in the placebo group (N=25; 48.1%). Time to relapse was significantly shorter i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07091453

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emslie, G. J., Kennard, B. D., Mayes, T. L., Nightingale-Teresi, J., Carmody, T., Hughes, C. W., Rush, A. J., Tao, R., & Rintelmann, J. W.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2008-04
Volume
165
Issue
4
Pages
459-467
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2118838026
Cited by
188
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH039188)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
fluoxetine, major depressive disorder, childhood depression, adolescent depression, relapse prevention, continuation treatment, placebo comparison, time to relapse
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Fluoxetine, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Placebos, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review