Cited by 58Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Predictors of hypomania during ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation

Open access
Widge, Alik S., Licon, Ernesto, Zorowitz, Samuel, Corse, Andrew, Arulpragasam, Amanda R., Camprodon, Joan A., Cusin, Cristina, Eskandar, Emad N. +2 more·2016·The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) is a novel therapy for neuropsychiatric disorders. Hypomania is a known complication of VC/VS DBS, but who is at risk is less understood. Factors such as family history, combined with details of DBS programming, might quantify that risk. The authors performed an iterative modeling procedure on a VC/VS DBS patient registry to identify key predictors. Hypomania was less common for men and for patients stimulated on the ventral right contact. It was more common with right monopolar stimulation. These findings may help to establish decision rules to reduce complications of VC/VS DBS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15040089

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]Widge AS Dougherty DD Managing patients with psychiatric disorders with deep brain stimulation Deep Brain Stimulation Management 2nd Marks WJ Jr New York Cambridge University Press 2015 XXX XXX

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Widge, A. S., Licon, E., Zorowitz, S., Corse, A., Arulpragasam, A. R., Camprodon, J. A., Cusin, C., Eskandar, E. N., Deckersbach, T., & Dougherty, D. D.
Affiliations
Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Published
2016-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
38-44
ISSN
  • 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7222
OpenAlex
W1828986537
Cited by
58
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH076179)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
hypomania, ventral capsule/ventral striatum, deep brain stimulation, DBS complications, risk factors, DBS programming, monopolar stimulation, sex differences, family history (medicine), neuropsychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Deep Brain Stimulation, Young Adult, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review