Cited by 119Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFace Recognition and Perception

Measuring the effects of alexithymia on perception of emotional vocalizations in autistic spectrum disorder and typical development

Open access
Heaton, P., Reichenbacher, L., Sauter, D., Allen, R., Scott, S., Hill, E.·2012·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: The results from recent studies suggest that alexithymia, a disorder characterized by impairments in understanding personal experiences of emotion, is frequently co-morbid with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the extent that alexithymia is associated with primary deficits in recognizing external emotional cues, characteristic in ASD, has yet to be determined. Method: Twenty high-functioning adults with ASD and 20 age- and intelligence-matched typical controls categorized vocal and verbal expressions of emotion and completed an alexithymia assessment. Results: Emotion recognition scores in the ASD group were significantly poorer than in the control group and performance was influenced by the severity of alexithymia and the psycho-acoustic complexity of the presented stimuli. For controls, the effect of complexity was significantly smaller than for the ASD group, although the association between total emotion recognition scores and alexithymia was still strong. Conclusions: Higher levels of alexithymia in the ASD group accounted for some, but not all, of the group difference in emotion recognition ability. However, alexithymia was insufficient to explain the different sensitivities of the two groups to the effects of psycho-acoustic complexity on performance. The results showing strong associations between emotion recognition and alexithymia scores in controls suggest a potential explanation for variability in emotion recognition in non-clinical populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291712000621

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ability to produce typical emotional facial expressions and to recognise emotion from vocal cues appear to be explained by alexithymia, rather than by ASD presence or severity itself.

    “The ability to produce typical emotional facial expressions (Trevisan et al., 2016), and to recognise emotion from vocal cues (Heaton et al., 2012), also appear to be explained by alexithymia, rather than by ASD presence or severity itself.”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Heaton et al., 2012

    The Abstract reports that alexithymia accounted for some, but not all, of the difference between the ASD and control groups in recognizing emotion from vocal cues. It also says alexithymia did not explain the groups’ different sensitivities to stimulus complexity, so the claim overstates its explanatory role. The facial-expression finding is attributed to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heaton, P., Reichenbacher, L., Sauter, D., Allen, R., Scott, S., & Hill, E.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heaton, P.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
2453-2459
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2126228263
Cited by
119
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (090961)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
alexithymia, autism spectrum disorder, emotion recognition, emotional vocalizations, emotion perception, high-functioning adults, typical development, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Aged, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phonation, Social Perception, Speech Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review