Cited by 673Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale

Taylor, Graeme J, Bagby, R.Michael, Parker, James D.A·2003·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective The aim of this paper was to review findings from studies that have evaluated the reliability and factorial validity of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) in different languages and cultures.Method Data from published articles as well as unpublished data from various countries were reviewed to determine whether the three-factor structure of the TAS-20 is replicable in different cultures by the method of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and whether the scale and its three-factor scales show internal reliability in these cultures.Results The TAS-20 has been translated adequately into 18 different languages and evaluated by CFA in 19 different countries. There is strong support for the generalizability of the three-factor structure of the scale across languages and cultures. In addition, the full-scale TAS-20 and the first two factors show adequate to good internal reliability for most of the translations. In most cultures where English is not the primary language, however, the third factor lacks internal reliability; this might be due to cultural differences or a response bias to the several negatively keyed items on this factor.Conclusion The findings support the use of the TAS-20 in cross-cultural research, and suggest that alexithymia may be a universal trait that transcends cultural differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00601-3

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M., & Parker, J. D. A.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Trent University (CA)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Graeme J
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
277-283
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054523308
Cited by
673
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 29
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Toronto Alexithymia Scale, TAS-20, alexithymia, cross-cultural validity, factor structure, internal consistency, scale translation, response bias
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Cultural Characteristics, Humans, Language, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review