Cited by 53Emotions and Moral BehaviorPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsEmpathy and Medical Education

Gender Differences in Empathy During Adolescence: Does Emotional Self-Awareness Matter?

Trentini, Cristina, Tambelli, Renata, Maiorani, Silvia, Lauriola, Marco·2022·Psychological Reports

Abstract

Empathy refers to the capacity to experience emotions similar to those observed or imagined in another person, with the full knowledge that the other person is the source of these emotions. Awareness of one's own emotional states is a prerequisite for self-other differentiation to develop. This study investigated gender differences in empathy during adolescence and tested whether emotional self-awareness explained these differences. Two-hundred-eleven adolescents (108 girls and 103 boys) between 14 and 19 years completed the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) to assess empathy and emotional self-awareness, respectively. Overall, girls obtained higher scores than boys on IRI subscales like emotional concern, personal distress, and fantasy. Regarding emotional self-awareness, we found gender differences in TAS-20 scores, with girls reporting greater difficulty identifying feelings and less externally oriented thinking than boys. Difficulty identifying feelings explained the greatest personal distress experienced by girls. Lower externally oriented thinking accounted for girls’ greater emotional concern and fantasy. These findings offer an insight into the role of emotional self-awareness–which is essential for self-other differentiation–as an account for gender differences in empathic abilities during adolescence. In girls, difficulty identifying feelings can impair the ability to differentiate between ones’ and others’ emotions, leading them to experience self-focused and aversive responses when confronted with others’ suffering. Conversely, in boys, externally oriented thinking can mitigate personal distress when faced with others’ discomfort.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0033294120976631

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trentini, C., Tambelli, R., Maiorani, S., & Lauriola, M.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Trentini, Cristina
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
2021-02-15
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
913-936
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W3129210195
Cited by
53
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
empathy, gender differences, adolescence, emotional self-awareness, alexithymia, self-other distinction, personal distress, emotional problems, fantasy, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Toronto Alexithymia Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Affective Symptoms, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review