Cited by 43Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth, Medicine and Society

Outpatient commitment and coercion in New Zealand: A matched comparison study

McKenna, Brian G., Simpson, Alexander I.F., Coverdale, John H.·2006·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background It has been hypothesized that a degree of coercion is a necessary component in using outpatient commitment to attain therapeutic outcome for those people subject to mental health law. However, what degree of coercion is required and how it is sustained is poorly understood. There is speculation that patients' recognition of beneficial as well as unwanted aspects of outpatient commitment (ambivalence) maybe an indicator that the necessary level of coercion has been achieved to facilitate a therapeutic outcome.Aim The aim of this study was to determine the level of coercion perceived by those under outpatient commitment in New Zealand. Emphasis was given to consideration of the presence of ambivalence and the role of interactive processes, including procedural justice, in influencing patients' perceptions of coercion.Method A cross-sectional comparative study was undertaken to compare the perceptions of coercion of patients on outpatient commitment (n = 69) to a matched sample of voluntary outpatients (n = 69), using the Perceived Coercion Scale. The influence of a range of variables, including patients' knowledge of and beliefs concerning outpatient commitment, were considered.Results Although the level of coercion for involuntary outpatients was relatively low, it was significantly higher than that experienced by voluntary outpatients. Yet involuntary outpatients were more likely to espouse benefits of outpatient commitment. Although there was an inverse correlation between perceptions of procedural justice and perceived coercion, procedural justice did not feature in the linear regression analysis.Discussion In the New Zealand context, involuntary outpatients hold contrasting views to outpatient commitment. We suggest that this ambivalence is an indicator that the degree of coercion is suffice to achieve therapeutic outcome. Furthermore, this study suggests the impact of procedural justice on patients' perceptions of coercion may be more crucial during admission to hospital than in the context of on-going community care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.07.004

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKenna, B. G., Simpson, A. I. F., & Coverdale, J. H.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
McKenna, Brian G.
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
145-158
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065146394
Cited by
43
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
outpatient commitment, coercion, mental health law, involuntary psychiatric admission, ambivalence, procedural justice, patient perspectives, treatment outcomes, New Zealand
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review