Cited by 13Smoking Behavior and CessationBehavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and Health

Understanding Tailored Internet Smoking Cessation Messages: A Reasoned Action Approach

Curtis, Brenda·2012·The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Abstract

Although message tailoring has been shown to produce experimental effects in previous studies, the cognitive mechanisms through which tailoring works have not been sufficiently studied. Using the integrative model to predict intentions to use the nicotine replacement patch among adult smokers, this study examines how tailoring theoretical elements of the integrative model is effective in changing the theoretical mediators. Participants were randomized into one of two conditions. In the experimental condition, participants received messages tailored to some or all of the underlying behavioral, injunctive normative, or self-efficacy beliefs with the expectation that changing the underlying beliefs would result in experimental differences in the integrative model’s direct measures. This expectation was confirmed. The integrative model also worked well in predicting intentions to perform the target behavior; attitude, perceived normative pressure, and perceived behavioral control accounted for 53 percent of the variance in intentions. Attitude and normative pressure were the strongest predictors of intention. These results provide support for tailoring messages using a reasoned action approach and provide insight into the mechanism through which message tailoring operates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002716211423642

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feelings of control have not received much attention in the context of smoking cessation, although perceived control has been found to positively influence intention to quit smoking.

    “Feelings of control have not received much attention in the context of smoking cessation, although perceived control has been found to positively influence intention to quit smoking.99”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, B.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Curtis, Brenda
Venue
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Published
2012-02-10
Volume
640
Issue
1
Pages
136-149
ISSN
  • 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3349
OpenAlex
W2140625657
Cited by
13
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
message tailoring, smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, integrative model, theory of reasoned action, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, injunctive norms, behavioral intention, smokers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review