Cited by 132Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEmile Durkheim and SociologyHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adolescents under Pressure: A New Durkheimian Framework for Understanding Adolescent Suicide in a Cohesive Community

Mueller, Anna S., Abrutyn, Seth·2016·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Despite the profound impact Durkheim’s Suicide has had on the social sciences, several enduring issues limit the utility of his insights. With this study, we offer a new Durkheimian framework for understanding suicide that addresses these problems. We seek to understand how high levels of integration and regulation may shape suicide in modern societies. We draw on an in-depth, qualitative case study ( N = 110) of a cohesive community with a serious adolescent suicide problem to demonstrate the utility of our approach. Our case study illustrates how the lives of adolescents in this highly integrated community are intensely regulated by the local culture, which emphasizes academic achievement. Additionally, the town’s cohesive social networks facilitate the spread of information, amplify the visibility of actions and attitudes, and increase the potential for swift sanctions. This combination of cultural and structural factors generates intense emotional reactions to the prospect of failure among adolescents and an unwillingness to seek psychological help for adolescents’ mental health problems among both parents and youth. Ultimately, this case illustrates (1) how high levels of integration and regulation within a social group can render individuals vulnerable to suicide and (2) how sociological research can provide meaningful and unique insights into suicide prevention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122416663464

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1177/000312240206700605 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Breault K. D., 1994, Emile Durkheim: Le Suicide 100 Years Later, 11
  3. Cohen Dov, 2003, Social Research, 70, 1073
  4. Joiner Thomas, 2005, Why People Die by Suicide
  5. Kochanek Kenneth D., 2015, Final Data for 2011. National Vital Statistics Reports
  6. 10.1177/000312240306800105 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/j.ctv1198tvs · DOI
  8. 10.1080/714860331 · DOI
  9. Pescosolido Bernice A., 1994, Emile Durkheim: Le Suicide 100 Years Later, 264
  10. Shweder Richard A., 2003, Social Research, 70, 1109

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 132

Metadata

Authors
Mueller, A. S., & Abrutyn, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Anna S.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2016-09-20
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
877-899
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2514400501
Cited by
132
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6
FWCI
12.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emile Durkheim and Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
adolescent suicide, social integration, social regulation, social networks, academic achievement pressure, local culture, help-seeking barriers, suicide prevention, parental attitudes, mental health stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review