Cited by 132Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health via Writing

Suicidal Disclosures among Friends: Using Social Network Data to Understand Suicide Contagion

Open access
Mueller, Anna S., Abrutyn, Seth·2015·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

A robust literature suggests that suicide is socially contagious; however, we know little about how and why suicide spreads. Using network data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, we examine the effects of alter's (1) disclosed and (2) undisclosed suicide attempts, (3) suicide ideation, and (4) emotional distress on ego's mental health one year later to gain insights into the emotional and cultural mechanisms that underlie suicide contagion. We find that when egos know about alter's suicide attempt, they report significantly higher levels of emotional distress and are more likely to report suicidality, net of extensive controls; however, alter's undisclosed suicide attempts and ideation have no significant effect on ego's mental health. Finally, we find evidence that emotional distress is contagious in adolescence, though it does not seem to promote suicidality. We discuss the implications of our findings for suicide contagion specifically and sociology more generally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022146514568793

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ekman Peter, 1982, Emotions in the Human Face
  2. Hatfield Elaine, 1994, Emotional Contagion
  3. Tarde Gabriel, 1903, The Laws of Imitation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueller, A. S., & Abrutyn, S.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Anna S.
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
2015-02-25
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
131-148
ISSN
  • 0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6000
OpenAlex
W2157573144
Cited by
132
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01- HD31921, P01HD031921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
suicide contagion, suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, emotional distress, mental health, adolescent social networks, disclosure, social networks, adolescent to adult transition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Peer Group, Risk Factors, Social Support, Suicide, Disclosure, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review