Cited by 27Adrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and CortisolClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Salivary cortisol and cortisone responses to tetracosactrin (synacthen)

Open access
Cornes, Michael P, Ashby, Helen L, Khalid, Yasmeen, Buch, Harit N, Ford, Clare, Gama, Rousseau·2015·Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To establish cutoff values for salivary liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy cortisol and cortisone in defining adequate adrenocortical function during a standard synacthen test. METHODS: We compared salivary liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy cortisol and cortisone responses to those of serum cortisol measured on the Roche E170 immunoassay analyser and the Abbott Architect i2000 before and 30 min and 60 min following 0.25 mg of intravenous synacthen. RESULTS: Correlations of salivary cortisol and cortisone were bimodal and linear, respectively. Based on these correlations, adequate salivary cortisol and cortisone responses to synacthen were extrapolated from a serum cortisol (Roche) cut-off of 550 nmol/L and defined as 15 nmol/L and 45 nmol/L, respectively. The Abbott method correlated well with the Roche but gave results that were about 20% lower than the Roche method. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of salivary cortisol and cortisone responses offers an alternative to those of serum cortisol during a synacthen test in the investigation of adrenal hypofunction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004563215577838

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornes, M. P., Ashby, H. L., Khalid, Y., Buch, H. N., Ford, C., & Gama, R.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Wolverhampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Cornes, Michael P
Venue
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Published
2015-02-27
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
606-610
ISSN
  • 0004-5632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1001
OpenAlex
W2334189733
Cited by
27
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
salivary cortisol, salivary cortisone, ACTH stimulation test, tetracosactrin, adrenocortical function, adrenal hypofunction, cut-off values, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, immunoassay comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenal Insufficiency, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cortisone, Cosyntropin, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Saliva, Young Adult, Administration, Intravenous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review