Cited by 138Adrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and CortisolClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Salivary cortisol and cortisone in the clinical setting

Blair, Joanne, Adaway, Jo, Keevil, Brian, Ross, Richard·2017·Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A resurgence of interest in salivary biomarkers has generated evidence for their value in assessing adrenal function. The advantages of salivary measurements include only free hormone is detected, samples can be collected during normal daily routines and stress-induced cortisol release is less likely to occur than during venepuncture. We review the use of salivary biomarkers to diagnose and monitor patients for conditions of cortisol excess and deficiency and discuss the value of measuring salivary cortisone versus salivary cortisol. RECENT FINDINGS: Developments in laboratory techniques have enabled the measurement of salivary hormones with a high level of sensitivity and specificity. In states of altered cortisol binding, salivary biomarkers are more accurate measures of adrenal reserve than serum cortisol. Salivary cortisone is a superior marker of serum cortisol compared with salivary cortisol, specifically when serum cortisol is low and during hydrocortisone therapy when contamination of saliva may result in misleading salivary cortisol concentrations. SUMMARY: Salivary cortisol and cortisone can be used to assess cortisol excess, deficiency and hydrocortisone replacement, with salivary cortisone having the advantage of detection when serum cortisol levels are low and there is no interference from oral hydrocortisone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/med.0000000000000328

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blair, J., Adaway, J., Keevil, B., & Ross, R.
Affiliations
  • Alder Hey Children's Hospital (GB)
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Ross, Richard
Venue
Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity
Published
2017-06
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
161-168
ISSN
  • 1752-296X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-2978
OpenAlex
W2609095319
Cited by
138
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
salivary cortisol, salivary cortisone, salivary biomarkers, adrenal function testing, cortisol excess, cortisol deficiency, hydrocortisone replacement, cortisol binding, adrenal reserve, saliva contamination
MeSH terms
Adrenal Insufficiency, Cortisone, Cushing Syndrome, Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Monitoring, Physiologic, Saliva, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review