Cited by 63Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Metacognitive training for patients with schizophrenia: Preliminary evidence for a targeted, single-module programme

Balzan, Ryan P, Delfabbro, Paul H, Galletly, Cherrie A, Woodward, Todd S·2014·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Metacognitive training is an eight-module, group-based treatment programme for people with schizophrenia that targets the cognitive biases (i.e. problematic thinking styles) thought to contribute to the genesis and maintenance of delusions. The present article is an investigation into the efficacy of a shorter, more targeted, single-module metacognitive training programme, administered individually, which focuses specifically on improving cognitive biases that are thought to be driven by a ‘hypersalience of evidence-hypothesis matches’ mechanism (e.g. jumping to conclusions, belief inflexibility, reasoning heuristics, illusions of control). It was hypothesised that a more targeted metacognitive training module could still improve performance on these bias tasks and reduce delusional ideation, while improving insight and quality of life. Method: A sample of 28 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and mild delusions either participated in the hour-long, single-session, targeted metacognitive training programme ( n = 14), or continued treatment as usual ( n = 14). All patients were assessed using clinical measures gauging overall positive symptomology, delusional ideation, quality of life and insight, and completed two cognitive bias tasks designed to elucidate the representativeness and illusion of control biases. Results: After a 2-week, post-treatment interval, targeted metacognitive training patients exhibited significant decreases in delusional severity and conviction, significantly improved clinical insight, and significant improvements on the cognitive bias tasks, relative to the treatment-as-usual controls. Performance improvements on the cognitive bias tasks significantly correlated with the observed reductions in overall positive symptomology. Patients also evaluated the training positively. Conclusions: Although interpretations of these results are limited due to the lack of an optimally designed, randomised controlled trial and a small sample size, the results are promising and warrant further investigation into targeted versions of the metacognitive training programme.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867413508451

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balzan, R. P., Delfabbro, P. H., Galletly, C. A., & Woodward, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-10-24
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
1126-1136
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2104601909
Cited by
63
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
metacognitive training, schizophrenia, delusions, cognitive biases, representativeness bias, illusion of control, jumping to conclusions, delusional conviction, insight, quality of life, positive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Delusions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review