Cited by 607Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryHallucinations in medical conditions

Measuring Delusional Ideation: The 21-Item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI)

Peters, E., Joseph, S., Day, S., Garety, P.·2004·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that in the general population there are schizotypal traits and symptoms that can be measured psychometrically. Norms are reported for a new 21-item version of the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI; Peters et al. 1999b). The PDI, originally based on the Present State Examination, incorporates the multidimensionality of delusions by including measures of distress, preoccupation, and conviction. A total of 444 healthy individuals completed the 21-item PDI and two other questionnaires measuring florid delusions and social desirability. A subsample also filled out an in-depth schizotypal personality scale. Thirty-three deluded inpatients also completed the PDI. The PDI's psychometric properties confirmed that it remains a reliable and valid instrument to measure delusional ideation in the general population. Consistent with the 40-item PDI, it was normally distributed, no sex differences were found, and there was an inverse relationship with age. Individual items were endorsed by just over one in four healthy adults. Although the deluded sample scored significantly higher, the range of scores overlapped considerably, with 11 percent of healthy adults scoring higher than the mean of the deluded group. As with our previous findings, the two samples were differentiated by their ratings on the distress, preoccupation, and conviction scales. These results suggest that these dimensions may be more important than the content of belief alone for placing an individual on the continuum between normal and delusional thinking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007116

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Cardiff Anomalous Perception Scale (CAPS) and the Peters Delusion Inventory (PDI) are specific to clinical features relating to hallucinations and delusions respectively.

    “Note that, although other schizotypy scales such as Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE) (27) and Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) (28) characterize a number of schizotypal features, CAPS and PDI are specific to clinical features relating to hallucinations and delusions respectively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, E., Joseph, S., Day, S., & Garety, P.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Peters, E.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
1005-1022
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2073117468
Cited by
607
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 35
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
delusional ideation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Delusions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review