Cited by 97Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of metacognitive training compared with a psycho-educational group in people with a recent-onset psychosis

Ochoa, S., López-Carrilero, R., Barrigón, M. L., Pousa, E., Barajas, A., Lorente-Rovira, E., González-Higueras, F., Grasa, E. +18 more·2017·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Aims were to assess the efficacy of metacognitive training (MCT) in people with a recent onset of psychosis in terms of symptoms as a primary outcome and metacognitive variables as a secondary outcome. Method: A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed. A total of 126 patients were randomized to an MCT or a psycho-educational intervention with cognitive-behavioral elements. The sample was composed of people with a recent onset of psychosis, recruited from nine public centers in Spain. The treatment consisted of eight weekly sessions for both groups. Patients were assessed at three time-points: baseline, post-treatment, and at 6 months follow-up. The evaluator was blinded to the condition of the patient. Symptoms were assessed with the PANSS and metacognition was assessed with a battery of questionnaires of cognitive biases and social cognition. Results: Both MCT and psycho-educational groups had improved symptoms post-treatment and at follow-up, with greater improvements in the MCT group. The MCT group was superior to the psycho-educational group on the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) total ( p = 0.026) and self-certainty ( p = 0.035) and dependence self-subscale of irrational beliefs, comparing baseline and post-treatment. Moreover, comparing baseline and follow-up, the MCT group was better than the psycho-educational group in self-reflectiveness on the BCIS ( p = 0.047), total BCIS ( p = 0.045), and intolerance to frustration ( p = 0.014). Jumping to Conclusions (JTC) improved more in the MCT group than the psycho-educational group ( p = 0.021). Regarding the comparison within each group, Theory of Mind (ToM), Personalizing Bias, and other subscales of irrational beliefs improved in the MCT group but not the psycho-educational group ( p < 0.001–0.032). Conclusions: MCT could be an effective psychological intervention for people with recent onset of psychosis in order to improve cognitive insight, JTC, and tolerance to frustration. It seems that MCT could be useful to improve symptoms, ToM, and personalizing bias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291716003421

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ochoa, S., López-Carrilero, R., Barrigón, M. L., Pousa, E., Barajas, A., Lorente-Rovira, E., González-Higueras, F., Grasa, E., Ruiz-Delgado, I., Cid, J., Birulés, I., Esteban-Pinos, I., Casañas, R., Luengo, A., Torres-Hernández, P., Corripio, I., Montes-Gámez, M., Beltran, M., De Apraiz, A., Domínguez-Sánchez, L., Sánchez, E., Llacer, B., Pélaez, T., Bogas, J. L., Moritz, S., & the Spanish Metacognition Study Group
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Institut d'Assistència Sanitària (ES)
  • Centre d'Higiene Mental Les Corts (Spain) (ES)
  • Andalusian Health Service (ES)
  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Ochoa, S.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2017-02-07
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
1573-1584
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2587661792
Cited by
97
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • “la Caixa” Foundation
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
metacognitive training, recent-onset psychosis, first-episode psychosis, psychoeducational intervention, cognitive insight, cognitive biases, jumping to conclusions, theory of mind, irrational beliefs, self-certainty, social cognition, symptom relief
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Cognitive Remediation, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review