Cited by 194Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Management and ResilienceCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Psychological outcomes following the Victorian Black Saturday bushfires

Bryant, Richard A, Waters, Elizabeth, Gibbs, Lisa, Gallagher, H Colin, Pattison, Philippa, Lusher, Dean, MacDougall, Colin, Harms, Louise +6 more·2014·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to map the prevalence and predictors of psychological outcomes in affected communities 3–4 years after the Black Saturday bushfires in the state of Victoria, Australia. Methods: Baseline assessment of a longitudinal cohort study in high-, medium-, and low-affected communities in Victoria. Participants included 1017 residents of high-, medium-, and low-affected fire communities. Participants were surveyed by means of a telephone and web-based interview between December 2011 and January 2013. The survey included measures of fire-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and general PTSD from other traumatic events, major depressive episode, alcohol use, and general psychological distress. Results: The majority of respondents in the high- (77.3%), medium- (81.3%), and low-affected (84.9%) communities reported no psychological distress on the K6 screening scale. More participants in the high-affected communities (15.6%) reported probable PTSD linked to the bushfires than medium- (7.2%) and low-affected (1.0%) communities (odds ratio (OR): 4.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.61–8.00, p = 0.000). Similar patterns were observed for depression (12.9%, 8.8%, 6.3%, respectively) (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.17–2.85, p = 0.008) and severe psychological distress (9.8%, 5.0%, 4.9%, respectively) (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.23–3.55, p = 0.007). All communities reported elevated rates of heavy drinking (24.7%, 18.7%, 19.6%, respectively); however, these were higher in the high-affected communities (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.01–1.89, p = 0.04). Severe psychological distress was predicted by fear for one’s life in the bushfires, death of someone close to them in the bushfires, and subsequent stressors. One-third of those with severe psychological distress did not receive mental health assistance in the previous month. Conclusions: Several years following the Black Saturday bushfires the majority of affected people demonstrated resilience without indications of psychological distress. A significant minority of people in the high-affected communities reported persistent PTSD, depression, and psychological distress, indicating the need for promotion of the use of health and complementary services, community-based initiatives, and family and other informal supports, to target these persistent problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867414534476

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In communities most at risk to the impacts of bushfires, the Black Saturday bushfires in Victoria, Australia were associated with incidences of PTSD, psychological distress, and depression related to the fires.

    “Bryant et al. mapped the psychological outcomes of the Black Saturday bushfires in Victoria, Australia; in communities most at risk to the impacts of bushfires, these authors found incidences of PTSD, psychological distress, and depression related to the fires [75].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryant, R. A., Waters, E., Gibbs, L., Gallagher, H. C., Pattison, P., Lusher, D., MacDougall, C., Harms, L., Block, K., Snowdon, E., Sinnott, V., Ireton, G., Richardson, J., & Forbes, D.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Department of Social Work, Department of Health (Victoria), Melbourne, Australia
  • Department of Health and Human Services (AU)
  • Emergency Services, Australian Red Cross, Melbourne, Australia
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2014-05-22
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
634-643
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2136093147
Cited by
194
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
Black Saturday bushfires, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, depression, alcohol consumption, disaster mental health, resilience, mental health service utilization, long-term mental health outcomes, Victoria, Australia, fear of death, predictors of psychological distress
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Disasters, Female, Fires, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Victoria, Prevalence, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review