The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bias in grading: A meta-analysis of experimental research findings
Abstract
This article provides a meta-analysis of experimental research findings on the existence of bias in subjective grading of student work such as essay writing. Twenty-three analyses, from 20 studies, with a total of 1935 graders, met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. All studies involved graders being exposed to a specific type of information about a student other than the student’s performance on a task. The hypothesized biasing characteristics included different race/ethnic backgrounds, education-related deficiencies, physical unattractiveness and poor quality of prior performance. The statistically significant overall between-groups effect size was g = 0.36. Moderator analyses showed no significant difference in effect size related to whether the work graded was from a primary school student or a university student. No one type of biasing characteristic showed a significantly higher effect size than other types. The results suggest that bias can occur in subjective grading when graders are aware of irrelevant information about the students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, assessment is indivisible from individual value judgements. No matter the structures and processes put in place, assessments are designed and evaluated by humans, with all their complex socio-cultural backgrounds, educational experiences, and intellectual and personal values (Malouff and Thorsteinsson 2016; Ryan and Viete 2009; Leathwood 2005; Stowell 2004).”
From A typology for a social justice approach to assessment: learning from universal design and culturally sustaining pedagogy (2019) · cites this paper as Malouff and Thorsteinsson 2016
In the citing paper
“Indeed, this was found to be a significant factor in student attainment outcomes when identity markers differed from those of academic staff (Malouff and Thorsteinsson 2016).”
From A typology for a social justice approach to assessment: learning from universal design and culturally sustaining pedagogy (2019) · cites this paper as Malouff and Thorsteinsson 2016
Citations
Cites
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509
A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects
Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.20 · Cited by 1,173
Cooper, W. H. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.218 · Cited by 492
Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness.
Landy, D., & Sigall, H. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036018 · Cited by 449
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research
(2015) · Eurasian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.14689/ejer.2015 · Cited by 299
Name stereotypes and teachers' expectations.
Harari, H., & McDavid, J. W. (1973) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034978 · Cited by 214
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.3102/00028312022002175 · DOI
- Belsey, C. (1988). Marking by numbers. AUT women , No. 15 (pp. 1–2). London, UK: Association of University Teachers.
- Borenstein M., 2005, Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2
- *Gerritson, M. (2013). Rubrics as a mitigating instrument for bias in the grading of student writing (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
- Haeran J., 2010, College Teaching, 57, 51
- *King J. L., 1998, Educational Research Quarterly, 22, 13
- Warren Piper D., 1996, Examination practices and procedures in Australian universities
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?
Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé, H., Dudik, M., & Wallach, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300830 · Cited by 777
The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education
Winstone, N., & Boud, D. J. (2020) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687 · Cited by 369
Novice Programmers and Introductory Programming
Robins, A. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.013 · Cited by 191
The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research
Fincher, S., Robins, A. V., Margulieux, L. E., Morrison, B. B., Shephard, K., Loui, M., Borrego, M., Lancaster, T., Falkner, K., Sheard, J., et al. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555 · Cited by 141
Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Racial Bias in Student Evaluation: The Role of Grading Scales
Quinn, D. M. (2020) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373720932188 · Cited by 124
Disrupting White Supremacy in Assessment: Toward a Justice-Oriented, Antiracist Validity Framework
Randall, J., Slomp, D., Poe, M., & Oliveri, M. E. (2022) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2022.2042682 · Cited by 126
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?Preprint
Holstein, K., Vaughan, J. W., Daumé, H., Dudík, M., & Wallach, H. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.05239 · Cited by 81
Hanesworth, P., Bracken, S., & Elkington, S. (2019) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1465405 · Cited by 80
Curzon, P., Bell, T., Waite, J., & Dorling, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.018 · Cited by 85
The effectiveness of a school-based, universal mental health programme in six European countries
Cefai, C., Camilleri, L., Bartolo, P. A., Grazzani, I., Cavioni, V., Conte, E., Ornaghi, V., Agliati, A., Gandellini, S., Vorkapić, S. T., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925614 · Cited by 99
Technology and Feedback Design
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D. J., Phillips, M., & Molloy, E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_124-1 · Cited by 67
Programming Paradigms and Beyond
Krishnamurthi, S., & Fisler, K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.014 · Cited by 69
Hagan, A. K., Topçuoğlu, B. D., Gregory, M. E., Barton, H. A., & Schloss, P. D. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01680-20 · Cited by 62
Horn, M., & Bers, M. U. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.023 · Cited by 63
Retention in Computer Science Undergraduate Programs in the U.S.
Stephenson, C., Miller, A. D., Alvarado, C., Barker, L. J., Barr, V., Camp, T. K., Frieze, C., Lewis, C. M., Mindell, E., Limbird, L. E., et al. (2018) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3406772 · Cited by 61
The History of Computing Education Research
Guzdial, M., & du Boulay, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.002 · Cited by 66
Gall, S., Adams, L., Joubert, N., Ludyga, S., Müller, I., Nqweniso, S., Pühse, U., du Randt, R., Seelig, H., Smith, D., et al. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206908 · Cited by 52
Teaching as Social Influence: Empowering Teachers to Become Agents of Social Change
Butera, F., Batruch, A., Autin, F., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., & Pulfrey, C. (2020) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12072 · Cited by 78
Jansen, T., & Møller, J. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103616 · Cited by 80
Autin, F., Batruch, A., & Butera, F. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000307 · Cited by 63
ACM RETENTION COMMITTEETwelve tips for creating a culture that supports all students in computing
Lewis, C. M. (2017) · ACM Inroads · doi:10.1145/3148524 · Cited by 45
Colomeischi, A. A., Duca, D., Bujor, L., Rusu, P., Grazzani, I., & Cavioni, V. (2022) · Children · doi:10.3390/children9111661 · Cited by 32
Biased grades? Changes in grading after a blinding of examinations reform
Bygren, M. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1638885 · Cited by 40
Cognitive Sciences for Computing Education
Robins, A. V., Margulieux, L. E., & Morrison, B. B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.010 · Cited by 44
Our validity looks like justice. Does yours?
Randall, J., Poe, M., Slomp, D., & Oliveri, M. E. (2023) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/02655322231202947 · Cited by 54
Randall, J., Poe, M., Oliveri, M. E., & Slomp, D. (2023) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2023.2285047 · Cited by 51
Computing EducationLiterature Review and Voices from the Field
Blikstein, P., & Moghadam, S. H. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.004 · Cited by 43
Analytic or holistic? A study about how to increase the agreement in teachers’ grading
Jönsson, A., Balan, A., & Hartell, E. (2021) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2021.1884041 · Cited by 34
A Fairness Evaluation of Automated Methods for Scoring Text Evidence Usage in Writing
Litman, D. J., Zhang, H., Correnti, R. J., Matsumura, L. C., & Wang, E. L. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_21 · Cited by 33
Learning Sciences for Computing Education
Margulieux, L. E., Dorn, B., & Searle, K. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.009 · Cited by 33
Lewis, C. M., Shah, N., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.017 · Cited by 36
Beard, K. S., Vakil, J. B., Chao, T., & Hilty, C. D. (2021) · Education and Urban Society · doi:10.1177/00131245211062527 · Cited by 38
Teacher Learning and Professional Development
Fincher, S. A., Kolikant, Y. B., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.026 · Cited by 29
Discrimination in grading: A scoping review of studies on teachers’ discrimination in school
Zanga, G., & Gioannis, E. D. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101284 · Cited by 32
Motivation, Attitudes, and Dispositions
Lishinski, A., & Yadav, A. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.029 · Cited by 34
Falkner, K. E. K., & Sheard, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.016 · Cited by 36
Qualitative Methods for Computing Education
Tenenberg, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.008 · Cited by 24
Fischer, J., Jansen, T., Møller, J., & Harms, U. (2021) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1186/s12052-021-00144-0 · Cited by 25
Grading in Hungarian Primary Schools: Mechanisms of Ethnic Discrimination against Roma Students
Kisfalusi, D., Janky, B., & Takács, K. (2021) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcab023 · Cited by 24
Haden, P. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.006 · Cited by 28
Does Educational Handover Influence Subsequent Assessment?
Dory, V., Danoff, D. S., Plotnick, L. H., Cummings, B., Gomez-Garibello, C. A., Pal, N. E., Gumuchian, S. T., & Young, M. E. (2020) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000003528 · Cited by 20
Hinton, D. P., & Higson, H. E. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182711 · Cited by 20
Holmes, M. A., Myles, L., & Schneider, B. B. (2020) · Advances in geosciences · doi:10.5194/adgeo-53-41-2020 · Cited by 20
Sabbagh, C. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12433 · Cited by 21
Lifelong Learning and Higher Education
Bjursell, C. (2024) · doi:10.37852/oblu.254.c595 · Cited by 18
Malmi, L., Utting, I., & Ko, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.022 · Cited by 18
Learning Outside the Classroom
Begel, A., & Ko, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.027 · Cited by 18
Implementation of an unconscious bias course for the National Research Mentoring Network
Javier, D., Solis, L. G., Paul, M. F., Thompson, E. L., Maynard, G., Latif, Z., Stinson, K., Ahmed, T., & Vishwanatha, J. K. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03466-9 · Cited by 22
Technology and Feedback Design
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D., Phillips, M., & Molloy, E. (2023) · Learning, Design, and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_124 · Cited by 16
Narratives of Joy and Failure in Antiracist Assessment: Exploring Collaborative Writing Assessments
(2024) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/pra-b.2024.2227 · Cited by 16
Computing for Other Disciplines
Guzdial, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.020 · Cited by 20
Analytic or Holistic: A Study of Agreement Between Different Grading Models
Jönsson, A., & Balan, A. (2020) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/mg59-xq60 · Cited by 15
Engineering Education Research
Loui, M. C., & Borrego, M. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.012 · Cited by 17
Nishen, A. K., & Kessels, U. (2021) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-021-09674-3 · Cited by 12
Leveraging the Integrated Development Environment for Learning Analytics
Carter, A., Hundhausen, C. D., & Olivares, D. M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.024 · Cited by 13
Bauer, C. A., Poddar, A., Brummelman, E., & Cimpian, A. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10034-2 · Cited by 16
Krämer, S., & Zimmermann, F. (2021) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2021.1934809 · Cited by 13
Modeling essay grading with pre-trained BERT features
Sharma, A., & Jayagopi, D. B. (2024) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-024-05410-4 · Cited by 17
Adkins, K. L., & Joyner, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12710 · Cited by 12
Teacher Knowledge for Inclusive Computing Learning
Goode, J., & Ryoo, J. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.025 · Cited by 12
Off the mark: Repetitive marking undermines essay evaluations due to boredom
Erturk, S., van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Igou, E. R. (2022) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-022-09929-2 · Cited by 11
School grades and educational attainments of adolescents and young adults born preterm
Alenius, S., Kajantie, E., Sund, R., Nurhonen, M., Haaramo, P., Näsänen-Gilmore, P. K., Lemola, S., Räikkönen, K., Schnitzlein, D. D., Dieter Wolke, C., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27295-4 · Cited by 11
School tutoring and academic performance: A too close relationship?
López-Agudo, L. A., Gutiérrez, Ó. D. M., & Marfil, J. A. M. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100903 · Cited by 11
Nishen, A. K., Corcoran, K., Holder, K., & Kessels, U. (2022) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-021-00595-5 · Cited by 10
Common-sense teaching for the 2020s: Ungrading in response to covid-19 and beyond
Johanesen, K., Claiborne, L. L., Falk, E. S., Parsons‐Hubbard, K., Kohfeld, K. E., Nadin, E., & Schmidt, A. H. (2023) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2023.2259784 · Cited by 12
Ernst, H. M., Prinz‐Weiß, A., Wittwer, J., & Voss, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391093 · Cited by 14
Mesny, A., Roberge‐Maltais, I., & Galy, A. (2025) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101307 · Cited by 18
Vahrenhold, J., Cutts, Q. I., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.019 · Cited by 11
Creating an Inclusive Learning Community to Better Serve Minority Students
Lin, P. S., & Kennette, L. N. (2022) · Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.36021/jethe.v4i3.250 · Cited by 9
Lancaster, T., Robins, A. V., & Fincher, S. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.015 · Cited by 11
Sonsteng-Person, M. A., Jaggers, J. W., & Loomis, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma · doi:10.1007/s40653-023-00546-w · Cited by 8
Experimental evidence of disparities in biology teachers’ responses to student writing
Sedlacek, Q. C. (2021) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.1963499 · Cited by 10
Haden, P. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.007 · Cited by 10
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
François, M., & Witte, K. D. (2025) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.4172 · Cited by 7
Barry, C.-J. S., Davies, N. M., & Morris, T. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11347-w · Cited by 7
Shephard, K. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.011 · Cited by 8
Student Knowledge and Misconceptions
Lewis, C. M., Clancy, M. J., & Vahrenhold, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.028 · Cited by 7
Shapiro, R. B., & Tissenbaum, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.021 · Cited by 9
El‐Hamamsy, L., Bruno, B., Kovacs, H., Chevalier, M., Zufferey, J. D., & Francesco Mondada, C. (2022) · Australasian Computing Education Conference · doi:10.1145/3511861.3511883 · Cited by 7
Objective Tests in Automated Grading of Computer Science Courses: An Overview
Lujak, M., Slavkovik, M., Lebis, A., Vermeulen, M., & Doniec, A. (2022) · Learning and analytics in intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04662-9_12 · Cited by 7
A Study of Ungrading in Upper-level Political Theory Courses
Kehlenbach, E. S. (2022) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2022.2160336 · Cited by 10
Best Practices in Summative Assessment
Tienson-Tseng, H. L. (2019) · ACS symposium series · doi:10.1021/bk-2019-1337.ch010 · Cited by 7
Gray, B. M., Lipner, R. S., Roswell, R. O., Fernández, A., Vandergrift, J. L., & Alsan, M. M. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m23-1588 · Cited by 6
Ko, A. J., & Fincher, S. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.005 · Cited by 7
Niehues, M., Gerlach, E., Wendeborn, T., & Sallen, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.946284 · Cited by 6
Old habits die hard? School guidance interventions and the persistence of inequalities
Borgna, C., Contini, D., Pintor, S. P., Ricucci, R., & Vigna, N. (2022) · Research in Social Stratification and Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2022.100728 · Cited by 9
Students As Teachers and Communicators
Simon, B., Hundhausen, C. D., McDowell, C., Werner, L., Hu, H. H., & Kussmaul, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.030 · Cited by 6
Perceptions of Physical Therapy Students on their Psychomotor Examinations: a Qualitative Study
Macauley, K., Laprino, S., & Brudvig, T. J. (2022) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-022-01514-z · Cited by 6
Jönsson, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.00002 · Cited by 7
Fincher, S. A., & Robins, A. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.001 · Cited by 9
Nicolai, K. D., Koenka, A. C., & Braxton, D. (2023) · Middle School Journal · doi:10.1080/00940771.2023.2232264 · Cited by 6
A Mixed Method Study of Nursing Students' Experiences of Discrimination Within Their Programs
Dhari, S., Slemon, A., & Handlovsky, I. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.16772 · Cited by 5
Schweig, J. D., Martínez, J. F., & Schnittka, J. (2022) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/720539 · Cited by 5
Quesada, G. M., Gabuardi, V. M. F., Vargas, R. H., Quirós, O. E., & Chaverri, G. (2023) · European Journal of Education and Pedagogy · doi:10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.645 · Cited by 5
Attempts at anti-racist teaching by white English teachers of black students
Schuman, J., & Reynolds, D. (2023) · English Teaching Practice & Critique · doi:10.1108/etpc-05-2022-0071 · Cited by 5
A Case Study of Qualitative Methods
Lewis, C. M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.032 · Cited by 14
Well-Being in International Large-Scale Assessments
Borgonovi, F. (2022) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38298-8_45-1 · Cited by 6
Gender differences between teachers’ assessments and test based assessments. Evidence from Spain
Gutiérrez, Ó. D. M., Prieto-Latorre, C., & Sánchez‐Rodríguez, M. I. (2023) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2023.2251715 · Cited by 5
Lystad, R. P., McMaugh, A. L., Herkes, G., Browne, G. J., Badgery‐Parker, T., Cameron, C. M., & Mitchell, R. J. (2023) · Concussion · doi:10.2217/cnc-2022-0012 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Malouff, J. M., & Thorsteinsson, E. B.
- Affiliations
- University of New England (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Malouff, John M
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-09-21
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-256
- ISSN
- 0004-9441 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-5884
- OpenAlex
- W2512722101
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
- EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Keywords
- grading bias, subjective grading, essay writing, student assessment, race and ethnicity, physical attractiveness, prior performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review