Cited by 1,509Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Assessment and PedagogyTeacher Education and Assessments

The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences

Jonsson, Anders, Svingby, Gunilla·2007·Educational Research Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sharing rubrics with students can enhance learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment.

    “Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”

    From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007

  • Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.

    “Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”

    From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007

  • Sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).

    “Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”

    From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Jonsson and Svingby, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G.
Affiliations
Malmö University (SE)
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
130-144
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115389369
Cited by
1,509
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 221 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 34
FWCI
27.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
rubrics, performance evaluation, scoring reliability, assessment validity, rater training, exemplars, analytic rubrics, rubric validation, learning promotion, feedback, self-assessment, teaching improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review