The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies
Abstract
Pilot studies are often recommended by scholars and consultants to address a variety of issues, including preliminary scale or instrument development. Specific concerns such as item difficulty, item discrimination, internal consistency, response rates, and parameter estimation in general are all relevant. Unfortunately, there is little discussion in the extant literature of how to determine appropriate sample sizes for these types of pilot studies. This article investigates the choice of sample size for pilot studies from a perspective particularly related to instrument development. Specific recommendations are made for researchers regarding how many participants they should use in a pilot study for initial scale development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Johanson & Brooks (2010) did recommend a sample size of 12 participants per arm for pilot trials.”
From A Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Dismantling Trial of the Efficacy of Self-As-Context During Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2021) · cites this paper as Johanson & Brooks (2010)
In the citing paper
“As the current study was below the average (Billingham etal., 2013) and below the recommended (Johanson & Brooks, 2010) sample size”
From A Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Dismantling Trial of the Efficacy of Self-As-Context During Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2021) · cites this paper as Johanson & Brooks, 2010
Citations
Cites
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
Julious, S. A. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.185 · Cited by 3,068
Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies
Hertzog, M. A. (2008) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20247 · Cited by 2,337
Handbook in research and evaluation
(1971) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(71)80129-6 · Cited by 1,488
Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference.
Aa, Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290969 · Cited by 1,365
Mooney, C., & Duval, R. (1993) · doi:10.4135/9781412983532 · Cited by 893
Statistical Inference for Coefficient Alpha
Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Salih, F. A. (1987) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168701100107 · Cited by 526
van Belle, G. (2002) · Wiley-Interscience eBooks · Cited by 461
Nelson, L. S. (2003) · Journal of Quality Technology · doi:10.1080/00224065.2003.11980200 · Cited by 422
WHAT SAMPLE SIZE is "ENOUGH" in INTERNET SURVEY RESEARCH?
Hill, R. L., & Hamilton, W. P. (1998) · Cited by 359
By Design: Planning Research on Higher Education.
Centra, J. A., Light, R. L., Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1991) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1982292 · Cited by 266
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Crocker, L., 1986, Classical and modern test theory
- Hill, R., 1998, Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6
- Lowry, R., 2008, VassarStats: Website for statistical calculation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 998
Gu, F., Zhu, Z., & Ali, S. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11051412 · Cited by 24
Abdullahi, M. S., Adieza, A., Arnaut, M., Nuhu, M. S., Ali, W., & Gwadabe, Z. L. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-01-2023-0014 · Cited by 23
Sun, Z., Yue, J., Tian, H.-Z., & Zhang, Q. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006236 · Cited by 23
“minimum sample size sufficient to assess the feasibility and efficacy of acupuncture.(24)”
BackgroundAbdullahi, M. S., Raman, K., & Solarin, S. A. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-02-2021-0056 · Cited by 36
Kim, J., Na, C.-S., Cho, M.-R., Park, G.-C., & Lee, J.-S. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269282 · Cited by 23
“The appropriate sample size for two-arm or three-arm pilot studies is more than 12 [34,35].”
Özen, S., Coşar, S. N. S., Cabıoğlu, M. T., & Çetin, N. (2019) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2018.0330 · Cited by 24
“38 Hertzog recommended 20 to 25 patients for intervention efficacy pilots, given reasonable effect sizes, but 30 to 40 patients per group for pilot studies comparing groups.”
Hue, M. T., Van, N. H. N., Nha, P. P., Vu, N. T., Duc, P. M., Trang, N. T. V., Thinh, P. T. N., Ánh, L. N., Huyen, L. T., & Tu, N. H. (2020) · Health Psychology Open · doi:10.1177/2055102920914076 · Cited by 23
“…to the article on sample size estimation for pilot studies, it was recommended that the reasonable minimum sample size for the pilot study was 30 where the purpose is a preliminary survey, and the precision of parameter estimates increases as sample size increases (Johanson and Brooks, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodZhang, Y., Liu, H., Zhou, L., Chen, K., He, J., Zou, Y., & Li, Z. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-484 · Cited by 22
“Allowing for a 25% dropout rate, we will recruit 25 patients in each group which means a total of 50 patients should be included during the whole trial [19,20].”
A study of the effects of co-branding between low-carbon islands and recreational activities
Hsiao, T. (2015) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2015.1093466 · Cited by 22
“(4) Following the suggestion of Johanson and Brooks (2010), we selected 30 representative samples from the target population (i.”
MethodStavropoulos, V., Bamford, L., Beard, C. L., Gomez, R., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-019-00099-w · Cited by 21
“It should be noted that (i) a minimum normative sample of 30 is recommended for the use of parametric criteria in pilot scale assessment studies (Johanson and Brooks 2010); (ii) sample sizes required tend to be smaller for higher levels of communality between the examined items and when the item to factors ratio excee…”
BackgroundWestgård, T., Hammar, I. O., Holmgren, E., Ehrenberg, A., Wisten, A., Ekdahl, A., Dahlin‐Ivanoff, S., & Wilhelmson, K. (2018) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-018-0228-1 · Cited by 24
El-Sayed, A. A. I., Alsenany, S. A., Asal, M. G. R., & Alasqah, I. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/8458533 · Cited by 22
“Tis sample size meets the minimum recommendation for pilot studies in scale development, as noted by Johanson and Brooks [40], who suggest at least 30 participants.”
Ribeiro, M. S., Bacalá, B. T., Alvarenga, W. D. A., Nascimento, L. C., McAllister, M., & Flória‐Santos, M. (2020) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104018 · Cited by 21
Martins, A., Fonseca, M. J., de Lemos, M. S., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.578099 · Cited by 21
Ang, I. Y. H., Tan, X. Q., Tan, C. M., Tan, C. H., Kwek, J. W. M., Tay, J., & Toh, S.-A. E. S. (2021) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/25820 · Cited by 20
“The enrollment target was set at 30 individuals, which was deemed to be sufficient to assess the feasibility and acceptability of such an intervention in a pilot program [33,34].”
BackgroundRandomized clinical trial of the benefit of laparoscopy with closure of loop ileostomy
Royds, J., O’Riordan, J. M., Mansour, E., Eguare, E. I., & Neary, P. C. (2013) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9183 · Cited by 21
Moon, Y.-K., Kim, M. H., & Nam, H. J. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2738-9 · Cited by 21
“The appropriate sample size of the two-arm or three-arm pilot study is reported as > 12 [23, 24].”
BackgroundKim, B.-H., Moon, Y. K., Kim, M. H., & Nam, H. J. (2020) · Integrative Medicine Research · doi:10.1016/j.imr.2020.100409 · Cited by 21
Asempapa, R. S., & Brooks, G. P. (2020) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-020-09482-0 · Cited by 23
Self-citationBăban, C. F., Băban, M., & Rangone, A. (2021) · Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1177/09717218211020475 · Cited by 20
“The small samples of responses may be considered adequate for this study (Hertzog, 2008; Johanson & Brooks, 2010), since the research is considered exploratory in nature.”
BackgroundNyantakyi, G., Sarpong, F., Asiedu, F., Bimpeh, D. A., Ntoso, J. K. A., & Nunoo, L. O. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2316886 · Cited by 27
“Following Johanson and Brooks (2010) recruiting a sample size of 10–20% of the actual study’s sample size is sufficient for a pilot test. the instrument’s internal consistency, reflecting its reliability, was measured using cronbach’s alpha coefficient.”
Roque, F., Soares, S., Breitenfeld, L., González-González, C., Figueiras, A., & Herdeiro, M. T. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090470 · Cited by 20
“However, the main goal of the pilot study was to assess the reliability of the questionnaire developed during stages 1 and 2 of the study, and for this purpose, the most widely used approach relies on sample sizes of n$30 and sample selection by a convenience method [21,22].”
MethodSchoultz, M., Atherton, I., Hubbard, G., & Watson, A. J. M. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-431 · Cited by 20
“Recommendation for pilot sample size calculation is 30 [56,57].”
BackgroundTaylor, N. J., Hogden, E., Clay‐Williams, R., Li, Z., Lawton, R., & Braithwaite, J. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011069 · Cited by 21
“29 For phase 2, guidance was taken from the literature on appropriate sample sizes for pilot studies testing a new scale (n=30).(30) As this was a pilot study, it was deemed appropriate to collect 10 PMOS questionnaires per ward, giving a total of 30 participants.”
MethodDemon or angel: an exploration of gamification in management
Liu, B., & Wang, J. (2019) · Nankai Business Review International · doi:10.1108/nbri-02-2018-0013 · Cited by 21
Hassan, M. U. (2019) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/19.77.667 · Cited by 20
Kim, D., Ko, J., Saravanan, V., & Lee, S. (2021) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108224 · Cited by 20
Bidgoli, A. A., Rahnamayan, S., Dehkharghanian, T., Riasatian, A., & Tizhoosh, H. R. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2022.3178299 · Cited by 19
“The experiments are performed with 31 independent runs according to statistical studies, and 30 is considered the minimum sample size in some forms of statistical analysis with the required margin of error and confidence level [37], [38].”
MethodJafar, A., Dollah, R., Dambul, R., Mittal, P., Ahmad, S. A., Sakke, N., Mapa, M. T., Joko, E. P., Eboy, O. V., Jamru, L. R., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191711108 · Cited by 26
Özkanlısoy, Ö., & Bulutlar, F. (2023) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics7030065 · Cited by 19
Savelberg, W., Moser, A., Smidt, M. L., Boersma, L. J., Haekens, C., & van der Weijden, T. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007698 · Cited by 18
Alaulamie, L. A. (2014) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 19
The development and initial psychometric validation of the eHealth readiness scale
Bhalla, A., Durham, R. L., Al-Tabaa, N., & Yeager, C. M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.015 · Cited by 19
Perspectives about the baby friendly hospital/health initiative in Australia: an online survey
Esbati, A., Taylor, J., Henderson, A. J., Barnes, M., & Kearney, L. N. (2020) · International Breastfeeding Journal · doi:10.1186/s13006-020-00266-z · Cited by 19
Romli, M. H., Mackenzie, L. A., Lovarini, M., & Tan, M. P. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012048 · Cited by 19
“A sample size of between 24 and 36 has been identified as the optimal number for a pilot study, and this study sought to recruit a similar sample size.(18) Participants were invited by telephone or in person to take part in this study.”
El‐Sayed, A. A. I., Alsenany, S. A., Badoman, T. E. A., & Asal, M. G. R. (2025) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.70140 · Cited by 19
“A pilot test was conducted with 40 nurses actively using AI in their practice, meeting the minimum recommendation of 30 participants for pilot studies in scale development (Johanson and Brooks 2010).”
Hitchcock, J. H., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Khoshaim, H. B. (2015) · International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches · doi:10.1080/18340806.2015.1076757 · Cited by 18
“Johanson and Brooks (2010) completed some simulation studies in sample size requirements for yielding stable estimates.”
BackgroundOn the antipodes of love and hate: The conception and measurement of brand polarization
Ramírez, S. A. O., Veloutsou, C. A., & Morgan‐Thomas, A. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114687 · Cited by 27
“The instrument was pre-tested with a pilot study of 60 respondents from a convenience sample to address concerns about questionnaire design, response (Thabane et al., 2010) or sampling (Johanson & Brooks, 2010).”
Understanding Evidence-Based Research Methods: Pilot Testing Surveys
Etchegaray, J. M., & Fischer, W. G. (2011) · HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/193758671100400411 · Cited by 18
“A good rule of thumb for the number of participants to include in a pilot study is 30 (Johanson & Brooks, 2010).”
BackgroundMalavenda, G. A., Musolino, G., Rindone, C., & Vitetta, A. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Transportation · doi:10.1155/2020/8827466 · Cited by 18
“(e pilot study is finalized to address a number of issues [17] such as the target population, the structuring of the questionnaire and the survey execution, the mobility and residential Hindawi Journal of Advanced Transportation Volume 2020, Article ID 8827466, 11 pages https://doi.”
BackgroundTom-Lawyer, O. (2014) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2014.27011 · Cited by 18
“The small sample size is justifiable on the grounds that Hill (1998, cited in [35] proposed 10 - 30 participants for a pilot survey research.”
BackgroundBuck, H. G., Harkness, K. I., Ali, M. U., Carroll, S. L., Kryworuchko, J., & McGillion, M. H. (2016) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.21775 · Cited by 18
Sajjad, M., Khan, R. A., & Yasmeen, R. (2018) · Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.12669/pjms.341.14354 · Cited by 17
Portfolio management with the help of AI : What drives retail Indian investors to robo‐advisors?
Banerjee, S. (2024) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/isd2.12346 · Cited by 24
“The sample size for the pilot was based on the suggestion of (Johanson & Brooks, 2010), wherein the authors state that a sample size of 30 to 36 is a reasonable minimum recommendation for a valid representative pilot survey.”
The Generation Z Readiness for Industrial Revolution 4.0
Yunos, S., & Din, R. (2019) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2019.1012223 · Cited by 17
Eijkelenkamp, K., van Geel, E. H., Kerstens, M. N., van Faassen, M. H. J. R., Kema, I. P., Links, T. P., & van der Horst‐Schrivers, A. N. A. (2020) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2020-0022 · Cited by 17
“We included at least 20 subjects, with a margin of 10% for possible dropout [6].”
MethodAnaam, E. A., Bakar, K. A. A., Satar, N. S. M., & Ma’arif, M. Y. (2020) · Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience · doi:10.1166/jctn.2020.8825 · Cited by 17
Appalasamy, J. R., Joseph, J. P., Seeta Ramaiah, S., Md Zain, A. Z., Quek, K. F., & Tha, K. K. (2020) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/17182 · Cited by 16
“Therefore, we estimated the sample size based on practical considerations and experience of the researchers [30,31].”
BackgroundAn Integrated Theory for Chatbot Use in Air Travel: Questionnaire Development and Validation
Trapero, H. A., Ilao, J. P., & Lacaza, R. (2020) · IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) · doi:10.1109/tencon50793.2020.9293710 · Cited by 17
“For a main trial designed with 5% significance, a pilot trial sample size of 15-30 is recommended [38][39].”
BackgroundTho, S. W., Chan, K. W., & Yeung, Y. Y. (2015) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9549-5 · Cited by 17
“The Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for the survey is .89 which is good for this acceptable sample size (Johanson and Brooks 2010).”
BackgroundShin, K.-M., Kim, J., Lee, S., Shin, M., Kim, T., Park, H., Lee, M., Hong, K.-E., Lee, S., & Choi, S. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-174 · Cited by 17
“This study is designed as a pilot study and allowing for a 20% dropout rate, each group will include 15 participants [34,35].”
MethodMoxibustion for prehypertension and stage I hypertension: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Shin, K.-M., Park, J., Yook, T. H., Kim, J.-U., Kwon, O., & Choi, S. (2018) · Integrative Medicine Research · doi:10.1016/j.imr.2018.11.002 · Cited by 17
Xie, H., Ho, R. C., Ismail, N. B., & Lau, T. C. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143938 · Cited by 16
Giang, N. T. P., Tan, T. D., & Nhung, L. T. (2025) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100670 · Cited by 29
Few glitters are original gold
Ansari, A. R., & Kashif, M. (2019) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-04-2018-0158 · Cited by 16
Can Oncologists Predict the Efficacy of Treatments in Randomized Trials?
Benjamin, D. M., Mandel, D. R., Barnes, T. A., Krzyzanowska, M. K., Leighl, N. B., Tannock, I. F., & Kimmelman, J. (2020) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0054 · Cited by 16
Parent-Reported Experience Measures of Care for Children With Serious Illnesses: A Scoping Review
Ang, F. J. L., Finkelstein, E. A., & Gandhi, M. (2022) · Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000002996 · Cited by 16
“Several developers did not survey or pilot-test the measure with the target parent population during development, which aids in item reduction and refinement (50, 51).”
BackgroundLai, N. Y. G., Foo, W. C., Tan, C. S., Kang, M. S., Kang, H. S., Wong, K. H., Yu, L. J., Sun, X. S., & Tan, N. M. L. (2022) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc8030110 · Cited by 21
Psychographic and demographic segmentation and customer profiling in mobile fintech services
Koziel, A. M., & Shen, C.-W. (2023) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-07-2023-1251 · Cited by 16
Feeling hopeful: development and validation of the trait emotion hope scale
Feldman, D. B., & Jazaieri, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1322807 · Cited by 16
Sung, W.-K., Wang, Y., Wang, L., & Luo, X. R. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2024.3430091 · Cited by 18
“Most studies suggest a size in the range of 10–30 [111], [112], [113], [114], [115].”
BackgroundBakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. B. (2020) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/20.78.314 · Cited by 18
“…(Online) https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.314 students in this pilot test, where the student was not involved in the actual study and as suggested Johanson and Brooks (2010), the number of samples in the pilot study was sufficient for a survey study with only at least 12 samples being used.”
InfluentialSavelberg, W., Smidt, M. L., Boersma, L. J., & van der Weijden, T. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05476-z · Cited by 16
“We asked each hospital to recruit 10 patients (mother sample), as a number of 30 to 40 patients is recommended for a pilot study [22], using purposive sampling [23].”
BackgroundA health promotion intervention to improve oral health of prisoners: results from a pilot study
Evensen, K. B., Bull, V. H., & Ness, L. (2021) · International Journal of Prisoner Health · doi:10.1108/ijph-11-2020-0085 · Cited by 18
Neelotpol, S., Hay, A. W. M., Jolly, A. J., & Woolridge, M. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010554 · Cited by 16
“METHODS Sample size Given the fact that limited information exists on lead exposure among South Asian women and children in the UK, a sample size for this study was calculated as 75 for the study group of South Asian pregnant women and 30 for the comparison group of Caucasian pregnant women.(14) Separate sample sizes…”
MethodOlayan, L. H., Alatassi, A., Patel, J., & Milton, S. (2018) · Perioperative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13741-018-0083-x · Cited by 16
“The chosen sample size for this pilot trial was based on recommendations for pilot studies from the literature (Johanson and Brooks 2009).”
MethodBostrøm, K., Mæhlum, S., Småstuen, M. C., & Storheim, K. (2019) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-019-0490-x · Cited by 16
“As the data in this report were obtained to generate preliminary estimates of treatment effectiveness, no a priori sample size calculation was performed to ensure sufficient statistical power to detect between-group differences in treatment effect [30].”
MethodLesjak, V. B., Šorgo, A., & Strnad, M. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13049-019-0683-6 · Cited by 22
Nurse staffing models in medical‐surgical units of acute care settings: A cross‐sectional study
Assaye, A. M., Wiechula, R., Schultz, T., & Feo, R. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Practice · doi:10.1111/ijn.12812 · Cited by 15
Development and initial validation of the mental health literacy questionnaire for chinese adults
Wu, J., Wang, C., Lu, Y., Zhu, X., Li, Y., Liu, G., & Guangrong, J. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02603-9 · Cited by 15
Moon, C., Gallegos, A. M., Sheikh, B., Kumar, P. A., Liss, M. A., & Patel, D. I. (2022) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/10732748221130964 · Cited by 15
“Missing questionnaire data were managed based on the percentage of missing responses per scale and recommendations based on the individual developers.(21,22) Descriptive statistics were performed and are presented at mean ± standard deviation.”
MethodKareem, H. M., Alsheikh, A. H., Alsheikh, W. H., Dauwed, M., & Meri, A. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03273-1 · Cited by 15
“The questionnaire was tested through a pilot study using 37 participants to enhance the response rate and understanding (Johanson and Brooks, 2010).”
The impacts of digital and learning orientations on supply chain resilience
Lin, Y., Pang, G., Duan, K., Luo, J., Wang, S., & Qu, J. (2024) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-04-2024-0379 · Cited by 16
Electroacupuncture for pressure ulcer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial
Zhang, Q., Yue, J., & Sun, Z. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-7 · Cited by 15
Instrument Development of Integrative Health and Wellness Assessment™
McElligott, D., Eckardt, S., Dossey, B. M., Luck, S. L., & Eckardt, P. A. (2017) · Journal of Holistic Nursing · doi:10.1177/0898010117747752 · Cited by 15
Acupuncture for gender differences and similarities in cerebral activity of health volunteers
Li, A., Wang, Y., Zhang, F., Wang, F., Zeng, X., Yue, J., Li, X., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000013655 · Cited by 15
Degree of Awareness and the Antecedents of the Digital Media Platform: The Case of Mobile Wallets
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2021) · FIIB Business Review · doi:10.1177/23197145211023413 · Cited by 15
“Johanson and Brooks (2009) recommend 15–30 respondents.”
Rasch Model for Validation a User Acceptance Instrument for Evaluating E-learning System
Rachman, T., & Napitupulu, D. B. (2017) · CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal · doi:10.21512/commit.v11i1.2042 · Cited by 19
“[12] recommended 30 participants.”
Bernardi, J., Dahiya, M., & Jobson, L. (2019) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2373 · Cited by 16
Measuring Earwax Cortisol Concentration using a non-stressful sampling method
Herane-Vives, A., Ortega, L., Sandoval, R., Young, A. H., Cleare, A. J., Espinoza, S., Hayes, A., & Benöhr, J. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05124 · Cited by 14
“We chose a longitudinal pilot study because this study is intended for investigating about: 1) Novel research questions, 2) Feasibility and suitability of novel methods, 3) Managing potential limitations of the method that may appear during the conduction of the pilot study and 4) Projecting future more extensive clin…”
MethodMalik, S., Maheshwari, G. C., & Singh, A. (2020) · Gender in Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/gm-06-2019-0087 · Cited by 14
Gösterişçi Tüketim Eğilimi Ölçeği’nın (GTE) Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
ASLAN, M. (2021) · İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi · doi:10.25204/iktisad.848114 · Cited by 14
M‐learning adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a kinematics course
Arredondo, L. A. L., & Valdés, H. (2021) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22443 · Cited by 14
Wong, M. T., & Rashid, S. M. M. (2022) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i11/15159 · Cited by 14
“According to Johanson and Brooks (2010), the minimum number of samples selected for a pilot study is only 30 people.”
BackgroundKareem, S. A., & Venugopal, P. (2023) · Leisure/Loisir · doi:10.1080/14927713.2023.2211582 · Cited by 20
“Based on recommendation of Johanson and Brooks (2009), a pilot study was conducted with 30 domestic tourists at Charminar to assess the appropriateness, language, and validity of an instrument.”
BackgroundSharmila Devi, R., Perumandla, S., & Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2024) · International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis · doi:10.1108/ijhma-01-2024-0004 · Cited by 14
Thi, H., Vu, H. M., Ngo, T. T., Vu, G. T., Nguyen, H. L. T., Hoang, M. T., Tran, B. X., Latkin, C. A., Ho, C. S. H., & Ho, R. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17124600 · Cited by 14
“It is generally suggested that a preliminary survey requires a minimum sample size of 30 participants for a pilot study [8].”
BackgroundModeling the Indian households' intention to adopt the solar net metering system
Kumar, V., Kaushik, A. K., & Singh, G. (2022) · Built Environment Project and Asset Management · doi:10.1108/bepam-10-2021-0129 · Cited by 15
Acupuncture for the Treatment of Oculomotor Paralysis: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
Bi, J., Li, W., Yang, Q., Li, B., Meng, Q.-G., & Liu, Y. (2016) · Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2016/3961450 · Cited by 14
“As a feasibility study, it was estimated that a sample of 40 participants with 20 in each group, assuming a drop-out rate of 20%, would be sufficient to provide data to answer the study questions [37, 38].”
BackgroundCZECH HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT BASIC GENETIC CONCEPTS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Vlčková, J., Kubiatko, M., & Uşak, M. (2016) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/16.15.738 · Cited by 14
Fu, H., Garrett, B., Tao, G., Cordingley, E., Ofoghi, Z., Taverner, T., Sun, C., & Cheung, T. (2021) · JMIR Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.2196/26332 · Cited by 13
“This is acceptable for this type of inductive study [48].”
Joint Responsibility for Careers
Aburumman, O. J., Omar, K. B., & Barhem, B. (2022) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/s10672-021-09401-2 · Cited by 13
Mei, K., Zhang, F., Zhang, J., Ming, H., Jiang, Y. H., & Huang, S. (2023) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12260 · Cited by 14
Korzilius, J. W., Oppenheimer, S. E., de Roos, N. M., Wanten, G. J. A., & Zweers, H. E. E. (2023) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-023-00882-5 · Cited by 13
“According to the literature, including thirty participants was sufficient to perform a pilot study [13].”
BackgroundLi, J., Ju, S.-Y., Zhu, C., Yuan, Y., Fu, M., Kong, L.-K., & Li, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36437 · Cited by 13
“The sample size of 48 students exceeded the suggested criterion of 30 respondents [25].”
BackgroundKupcu, C., Bodur, G., Küçükkaya, A., & Göktaş, P. (2024) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104179 · Cited by 14
Sharkawy, M. N., Mohamed, M., & Abbas, H. M. (2025) · The Journal of Frailty & Aging · doi:10.1016/j.tjfa.2024.100001 · Cited by 13
Assessing nursing assistants’ competency in palliative care: An evaluation tool
Karacsony, S., Chang, E. M. L., Johnson, A., Good, A., & Edenborough, M. (2018) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2018.09.001 · Cited by 13
A randomized controlled field trial of iBsafe—a novel child safety game app
Dixon, C. A., Ammerman, R. T., Johnson, B. L., Lampe, C., Hart, K. W., Lindsell, C. J., & Mahabee‐Gittens, E. M. (2019) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth.2019.01.02 · Cited by 13
“A sample size of 60 (30 in each arm) was selected a priori based on recommendations for conducting pilot testing (16).”
Survey Development: Community Involvement in the Design and Implementation Process
Kelley, A., Piccione, C., Fisher, A., Matt, K., Andreini, M., & Bingham, D. (2019) · Journal of Public Health Management and Practice · doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000001016 · Cited by 13
“The selection of Tribal members was consistent with current literature on survey design, which prioritizes having a sample that accurately represents the population that will be completing the survey rather than having a large sample size.(23) The survey took less than 5 minutes to complete per participant.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johanson, George A.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-18
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 394-400
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W1984294110
- Cited by
- 1,012
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 134 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Keywords
- pilot study, sample size determination, scale development, instrument development, item difficulty, item discrimination, internal consistency, response rate, parameter estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review