The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies
Abstract
Pilot studies are often recommended by scholars and consultants to address a variety of issues, including preliminary scale or instrument development. Specific concerns such as item difficulty, item discrimination, internal consistency, response rates, and parameter estimation in general are all relevant. Unfortunately, there is little discussion in the extant literature of how to determine appropriate sample sizes for these types of pilot studies. This article investigates the choice of sample size for pilot studies from a perspective particularly related to instrument development. Specific recommendations are made for researchers regarding how many participants they should use in a pilot study for initial scale development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Johanson & Brooks (2010) did recommend a sample size of 12 participants per arm for pilot trials.”
From A Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Dismantling Trial of the Efficacy of Self-As-Context During Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2021) · cites this paper as Johanson & Brooks (2010)
In the citing paper
“As the current study was below the average (Billingham etal., 2013) and below the recommended (Johanson & Brooks, 2010) sample size”
From A Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Dismantling Trial of the Efficacy of Self-As-Context During Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2021) · cites this paper as Johanson & Brooks, 2010
Citations
Cites
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
Julious, S. A. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.185 · Cited by 3,068
Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies
Hertzog, M. A. (2008) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20247 · Cited by 2,337
Handbook in research and evaluation
(1971) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(71)80129-6 · Cited by 1,488
Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference.
Aa, Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290969 · Cited by 1,365
Mooney, C., & Duval, R. (1993) · doi:10.4135/9781412983532 · Cited by 893
Statistical Inference for Coefficient Alpha
Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Salih, F. A. (1987) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168701100107 · Cited by 526
van Belle, G. (2002) · Wiley-Interscience eBooks · Cited by 461
Nelson, L. S. (2003) · Journal of Quality Technology · doi:10.1080/00224065.2003.11980200 · Cited by 422
WHAT SAMPLE SIZE is "ENOUGH" in INTERNET SURVEY RESEARCH?
Hill, R. L., & Hamilton, W. P. (1998) · Cited by 359
By Design: Planning Research on Higher Education.
Centra, J. A., Light, R. L., Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1991) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1982292 · Cited by 266
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Crocker, L., 1986, Classical and modern test theory
- Hill, R., 1998, Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6
- Lowry, R., 2008, VassarStats: Website for statistical calculation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 998
Rosalina, K., & Jusoh, R. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2487597 · Cited by 6
“This study also employed a pilot study of 60 respondents to overcome the issues of instrument reliability and validity (Johanson & Brooks, 2010).”
Measuring Multi-Ethnic Students Citizenship Competence: Domains and Indicators
Awang, M. M., Alfitri, A., Ahmad, A. R., & Ulu, N. L. (2016) · American Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3844/ajassp.2016.123.130 · Cited by 4
“Johanson and Brooks (2010) investigated the choice of a sample size for the purpose of validation and recommended, “… 30 representative participants from the population of interest is a reasonable minimum recommendation for a pilot study where the purpose is preliminary survey or scale development”…”
BackgroundHassan, N. F., Puteh, S., Sanusi, A. M., & Zahid, N. H. C. M. (2020) · International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE) · doi:10.3991/ijoe.v16i06.13575 · Cited by 4
Lee, S. M., Falconer, I. H. E., Madden, T., & Laidler, P. O. (2021) · BMJ Open Gastroenterology · doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000640 · Cited by 4
Maqāṣid Entrepreneurial Finance: An Islamic Approach to Small Business Capital Structure Theory
Purwidianti, W., Pramuka, B. A., Laksana, R. D., & Adawiyah, W. R. (2023) · ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance · doi:10.55188/ijif.v15i3.609 · Cited by 4
حسن, ن. ن., Petrides, K. V., & Hull, L. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287013 · Cited by 4
Rojas, M., González, J. C., & Ortiz‐López, N. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05150-6 · Cited by 4
“Additionally, the expert’s qualitative observations led us to include two questions: Question 12 (What teaching methodology does your program use to achieve learning outcomes on LGBTIQ + topics for your students?) and Subquestion 8.12 (Non-binary gender identities (queer)) [21].”
MethodInfluentialAng, F. J. L., Gandhi, M., Østbye, T., Malhotra, C., Malhotra, R., Chong, P. H., Amin, Z., Chow, C., Tan, T. S. Z., Tewani, K. G., et al. (2024) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-024-01401-x · Cited by 5
“We recruited 30 parents (>21 years old) of seriously ill children ( 18 years old) in Singapore, following recommended sample size for pilot-studies in measure development [43].”
Fu, X., Shen, A., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Lü, Q. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100494 · Cited by 4
Gigli, K. H., Featherston, K. G., & Poghosyan, L. (2024) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/jnm-2024-0057 · Cited by 4
A Country's Image as Tourist Destination for External Intermediaries
Vicol, O. C., & Zaiţ, A. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
Tsai, M.-Y., Su, Y.-J., Ng, H., Chen, S., Huang, Y., Wu, C., & Chen, Y. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009976 · Cited by 4
“05 and power of 80%.(30) The dropout rate during the study is estimated to be 10%, so a minimum of 45 participants will be needed in each group.”
BackgroundDeterminants of SMEs Performance of the Gem and Jewelry Industry in Thailand: A Pilot Study
Ahmad, N. R., Shariff, M. N. M., & Hafeez, M. H. (2017) · Asian Journal of Social Science Studies · doi:10.20849/ajsss.v2i3.173 · Cited by 5
“However, Johanson and Brooks (2010) suggest that 30 respondents from the population of interest is a reasonable minimum recommendation for a pilot study.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialValidating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument
Squires, A. P., Yin, H. S., Jones, S. A., Greenberg, S. A., Moore, R. J., & Cortes, T. (2017) · HLRP Health Literacy Research and Practice · doi:10.3928/24748307-20171030-01 · Cited by 4
“Survey periods lasted 3 weeks and were extended as necessary until at least a 50% response rate was achieved, a level considered acceptable for Internet-based surveys (Johanson & Brooks, 2010; Michael Bowling et al., 2006).”
BackgroundAre Vietnamese Individual Investors Financially Literate? A Preliminary Study
Dang, P., Nguyen, L. T. M., & Tran, K. (2017) · Journal of Economics Business and Management · doi:10.18178/joebm.2017.5.5.513 · Cited by 4
“[50] suggested that a sample size of at least 30 should be sufficient for a preliminary test in scale development.”
BackgroundSatisfying visitors’ needs: What to resort to
Viljoen, A., Kruger, M., & Saayman, M. (2019) · South African Journal of Business Management · doi:10.4102/sajbm.v50i1.1370 · Cited by 4
Bedford, J., & van der Laan, L. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1806910 · Cited by 4
Graduate Students' Perceived Contribution of Scholarship Grants to Academic Success
Cagasan, E. G., Belonias, B., & Cuadra, M. E. J. (2019) · Science and Humanities Journal · doi:10.47773/shj.1998.121.8 · Cited by 4
Development of Acid Base e-learning (e-PAB) Module using Google Classroom
Rahim, N., & Lee, T. T. (2021) · Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters · doi:10.37134/jsml.vol9.1.1.2021 · Cited by 4
Bibi, M., Khan, R. A., & Manzoor, A. (2021) · Market Forces · doi:10.51153/mf.v16i1.447 · Cited by 5
Amalan Penggunaan Media Digital Dalam Kalangan Guru-Guru Sekolah Orang Asli
Yusof, A. S. B. M., & Surat, S. (2021) · Journal of Education and Human Development · doi:10.15640/jehd.v10n1a16 · Cited by 4
The Impact of Consumers’ Dynamic Browsing Modes on the Effect of In-Feed Native Advertising
Xiao, B., & Zhang, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842906 · Cited by 4
Grasiaswaty, N., Pradita, L., & Sadida, N. (2022) · The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health · doi:10.20473/ijosh.v11i3.2022.402-411 · Cited by 14
“Although Johanson and Brooks (2010) believe that this number is sufficient for research on developing early measuring tools, they still stated that a larger sample size would be preferable.”
BackgroundNoor, N. M., Zolkepli, I. A., & Omar, B. (2023) · Journal of Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.32890/jict2023.22.1.5 · Cited by 4
Norful, A. A., Brewer, K. C., Adler, M., & Dierkes, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2022.2164563 · Cited by 4
Examining adverse events after intensive care unit discharge: Outcomes from a pilot questionnaire
Elliott, M., Page, K., Worrall‐Carter, L., & Rolley, J. X. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Practice · doi:10.1111/ijn.12087 · Cited by 4
Measuring Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Organizational Climate: Instrument Adaptation
Boyd, D. R., & Poghosyan, L. (2017) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/1061-3749.25.2.224 · Cited by 4
“Thirty participants are sufficient to conduct pilot testing for survey development (Johanson & Brooks, 2010).”
BackgroundForeign Television Cartoon Programs and Children’s Social Behavior in Kenya
Njiiri, M., Mberia, H., & Muchunku, I. (2018) · International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications · doi:10.29322/ijsrp.8.5.2018.p7716 · Cited by 4
Zhao, L., Liu, L., Zhang, C. S., Zeng, L., Zhao, J., Wang, L., Jing, X., Wang, K., & Li, B. (2018) · Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2018/6126410 · Cited by 4
“A sample size of 30 per group was regarded as a reasonable minimum recommendation for a pilot study [36].”
BackgroundThe Development of Teachers’ Knowledge of the Nature of Mathematical Modeling Scale
Asempapa, R. S. (2020) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.737284 · Cited by 4
Registered report: Initial development and validation of the eating disorders safety behavior scale
Reilly, E. E., Bohrer, B. K., Sullivan, D. J., Essayli, J. H., Farrell, N. R., Brown, T. A., Gorrell, S., Anderson, L. M., Cooper, M., Schreyer, C. C., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23479 · Cited by 5
“Specifically, existing recommendations in the literature range from ~24 to 40 participants for a pilot study in measure development (Hertzog, 2008; Johanson & Brooks, 2010).”
BackgroundUbaid, U. U., Rethinasamy, S., & Ramanair, J. (2021) · Issues in Language Studies · doi:10.33736/ils.2763.2021 · Cited by 4
“Researchers suggested that a pilot study sample should range from 10 to 30 participants as the representative sample for the main study in survey research (Hill, 1998; Isaac & Michael, 1995; Johanson & Brooks, 2010; Machin et al., 2018).”
BackgroundBlended learning to promote professional behavior during the covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study
Tahulending, P. S., Eka, N. G. A., & Purbojo, R. (2021) · Bali Medical Journal · doi:10.15562/bmj.v10i3.2812 · Cited by 4
Duprez, V., Pover, M. D., Spiegelaere, M. D., & Beeckman, D. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12044 · Cited by 4
Investigating and Measuring Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Organizational Climate
Boyd, D. R. (2017) · doi:10.7916/d8445s76 · Cited by 4
Determinants of Attitude Towards Islamic Financing Among Halal-Certified Micro and SMEsPreprint
Ser, N., Nursyafira, F., & Sundram, V. P. K. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2540610 · Cited by 4
“The sample size met the recommended, (Johanson & Brooks, 2009) that 30 representatives from population of interest is the minimum recommendation for preliminary survey.”
MethodBalador, Z. (2020) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17148512.v1 · Cited by 4
The Duolingo English Test and East Africa: Preliminary linking results with IELTS & CEFR
Bézy, M., & Settles, B. (2015) · doi:10.46999/clox5352 · Cited by 4
“for reliability and concordance purposes [13].”
Brooks, G. P., Pokoo, J., Adjanin, N., & Johanson, G. A. (2023) · General Linear Model Journal · doi:10.31523/glmj.047002.001 · Cited by 3
Self-citationEffects of a social network enhancement intervention for older adults: a feasibility study
Fu, J., Zheng, Z., Zhai, B., Guo, R., Kong, N., Liu, X., & Li, J. (2024) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-024-05442-y · Cited by 5
“By calculating sample size based on pilot studies and referring to previous studies, a sample size of 20–30 has been chosen for the current study [19, 20].”
MethodYücel, H., & CENGİZ, S. (2025) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · doi:10.1007/s13753-025-00666-x · Cited by 3
“Scale development pilot studies should evaluate at least 30 people, according to Johanson and Brooks (2010).”
Phung, T.-B., & Vo, P.-T. (2025) · Journal of Financial Services Marketing · doi:10.1057/s41264-025-00324-9 · Cited by 3
Wolf, M., Herstätter, P., Rantschl, M., Ramsauer, C., & Magana, A. J. (2025) · Computers & Education X Reality · doi:10.1016/j.cexr.2025.100125 · Cited by 13
Development and Validation of Sustainable Tourism Indicators: A Mixed-Method Study
Javed, M., & Tučková, Z. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251397861 · Cited by 3
“Likewise, Johanson and Brooks (2010) argued 30 participants as a reasonable number, however, recommended to include a few more participants as a better option.”
Nawang, W. R. W., & Azri, N. A. (2025) · International Journal of Islamic Finance and Sustainable Development · doi:10.55188/ijifsd.v17i4.1026 · Cited by 3
“Next, the reliability of the constructs was assessed by conducting a 30-sample pilot test (Johanson & Brooks, 2010) and determining the Cronbach’s alpha (Dwivedi et al. , 2006).”
Wu, Z., Gan, H., Zhang, L., Hussain, W. M. H. W., & Ali, S. H. M. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-41586-0 · Cited by 6
“A pretest with 56 participants confirmed adequate reliability, with all Cronbach’s α values exceeding 0.70, and good comprehensibility prior to formal data collection 98,99 .”
InfluentialQuan, X., & Sun, Y. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-46314-2 · Cited by 5
“Methodological literature suggests that a pilot sample of approximately 15–30 participants is adequate for questionnaire pretesting in large-scale survey research 49,50 .”
Kibria, M. G., Khanom, K., Sultana, J., & Chowdhury, F. P. (2026) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/09721509261443740 · Cited by 5
Al-Hamadani, S. M. Z. F., Egbelakin, T., Sher, W., & von Meding, J. K. (2021) · Construction Economics and Building · doi:10.5130/ajceb.v21i3.7655 · Cited by 4
“study is recommended to improve the data collection instrument development ( Johanson and Brooks, 2010).”
BackgroundZhang, Z.-Y., Wang, R., Zhang, L., Gu, M., & Guan, X.-E. (2022) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000029707 · Cited by 3
“Since this is a pilot retrospective study and there are insufficient data to support the sample size calculation, a minimum of 35 patients in each group (a total of 70 patients in both groups) is supposed to evaluate its feasibility.[24]”
BackgroundRaza, M., Khalid, R., Ivaşcu, L., & Kasuma, J. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15020918 · Cited by 3
The Development and Validation of the Zero Cost Textbook Satisfaction Scale (ZSS)
Redcay, A., Pfannenstiel, N. A., & Albert, D. R. (2022) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.14.4.487 · Cited by 2
Secaida, L. P. Y., Mori, S., & Nomura, R. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151612591 · Cited by 5
Yılmaz, G. (2023) · Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies · doi:10.21325/jotags.2023.1267 · Cited by 3
Suzianti, A., Peranginangin, S. M., & Fathia, S. N. (2024) · Evergreen · doi:10.5109/7172307 · Cited by 3
Vázquez-Cancela, O., Lens-Perol, G., Mascareñas‐García, M., Santana-Armas, M., & Vázquez-Lago, J. M. (2024) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics13121126 · Cited by 5
“The literature suggests that, for initial item analysis, a sample size between 50 and 100 subjects is often sufficient, but to enhance reliability, a ratio of 5 to 10 subjects per item, with a minimum of 300 participants, is generally advised [48].”
Yurdakul, O., Alan, A., Krauter, J., Korn, S. M., Gust, K. M., Shariat, S. F., & Hassler, M. R. (2024) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-024-02325-z · Cited by 3
Lu, A., Wang, M., Jiang, N., Liu, H., Gao, Y., Wang, T., Xu, X., & Li, B. (2025) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890.2025.2496410 · Cited by 3
“Thus, recruitment will take place for a participant sample size of 60, with 30 individuals per group, to obtain the practical aim of our study based on clinical experience [36].”
Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Sern, L. J., Li, X., Yun, L. J., En, L. J., Ramachandram, D. S., Lim, A. S., Dujaili, J. A., & Blebil, A. Q. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0321551 · Cited by 3
“Previous research has shown that a minimum sample size of 30 participants from the population of interest is typically recommended for a pilot study aiming for conducting a preliminary survey [24].”
Mendoza, M. E. (2025) · Research in Post-Compulsory Education · doi:10.1080/13596748.2025.2502257 · Cited by 3
Neelotpol, S., & Hia, R. A. (2016) · Journal of Local and Global Health Science · doi:10.5339/jlghs.2016.1 · Cited by 3
Shin, S., Lee, J., Yu, A., Yoo, J.-H., & Lee, E. (2016) · Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2016/5709295 · Cited by 3
“One study suggested that at least 12 participants should be recruited in each group to conduct a pilot trial [14], and another suggested that an increase in size from 12 to 18 or 24 narrowed the confidence interval [15].”
BackgroundExploring Storytelling for Digital Memorialization
Ataguba, G., Penrice, S., & Shearer, J. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_9 · Cited by 3
Kohnen, R. F., Lavrijsen, J. C. M., Akkermans, R., Gerritsen, D. L., & Koopmans, R. T. C. M. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.017 · Cited by 3
Coşar, S. N. S., Özen, S., Kurtcebe, A. N., Çoşkun, M., & Yemişçi, O. Ü. (2021) · Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.5606/tftrd.2021.5139 · Cited by 3
“Articles on the adequate sample size in initial studies suggest a sample size of between 10 and 30 patients.[23] Therefore, a sample size between 10 to 30 patients per group was required.”
BackgroundValidity and Reliability of the Malaysian Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) using Rasch Measurement Model
Tambol, Z., Bakar, A. Y. A., & Mahmud, M. I. (2021) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i8/10770 · Cited by 3
“Whereas, Johanson and Brooks (2010) suggest a minimum number of 30 people for a pilot study in which the aim is to study early or development scale.”
BackgroundAlbayrak, E., & Özden, Ş. Y. (2021) · Journal of Individual Differences in Education · doi:10.47156/jide.1027431 · Cited by 7
Abdullahi, M. S., Adeiza, A., Ahmed, U., Khalid, N., Gwadabe, Z. L., & Fawehinmi, O. O. (2021) · Jurnal Pengurusan · doi:10.17576/pengurusan-2021-63-10 · Cited by 3
“Reliability (internal consistency) among the items was also tested with 40 randomly selected academics with similar features which were not part of the targeted respondents through Cronbach’s Alpha (α) reliability (Johanson & Brooks 2010).”
MethodYemişçi, O. Ü., Özen, S., Şişman, T. Ö., Anıl, C., & Coşar, S. N. S. (2022) · Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.5606/tftrd.2022.7021 · Cited by 3
“Articles on adequate sample size in initial studies recommend a sample size of between 10 and 30 patients.[12] Therefore, a sample size between 10 and 30 patients per group was attained.”
BackgroundSilva, T. M., Estrela, M., Magalhães, S., Simões, C., Cachim, A., Costa, T., Crexinski, G., Almeida, A. M., Figueiras, A., Roque, F., et al. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12081160 · Cited by 3
Children's perioperative multidimensional anxiety scale: Turkish cross‐cultural adaptation
Çelik, S., Kurt, A., Altıntaş, S., & Uçar, Ö. (2023) · Pediatric Anesthesia · doi:10.1111/pan.14636 · Cited by 3
Sajari, F. F. M., Zulkifli, H., & Surat, S. (2023) · Journal of Quran Sunnah Education & Special Needs · doi:10.33102/jqss.vol7no1.183 · Cited by 3
Measuring Health Care Work–Related Contextual Factors: Development of the McGill Context Tool
Thomas, A., St‐Onge, C., Renaud, J., George, C., Iqbal, M. Z., Brousseau, M., Dyer, J.-O., Gallagher, F., Lacasse, M., Ledoux, I., et al. (2023) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1097/ceh.0000000000000514 · Cited by 3
“46,47 The pilot test was conducted over a period of four weeks using Research Electronic Data Capture, a web-based application designed for data collection and management.”
MethodWang, M., Yuan, F., Xu, X., Zhang, T., Guo, J., Wang, G. G., Wang, L., Sun, J.-Q., Zhang, F., & Li, B. (2023) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s416893 · Cited by 3
“Therefore, a sample size of 60 participants (30 for each group) will be recruited to achieve the practical purpose of the trial based on clinical experience.(24)”
MethodRazia, S., & Ah, S. H. A. B. (2023) · Journal of Design and Built Environment · doi:10.22452/jdbe.vol23no1.5 · Cited by 3
“Johanson and Brooks (2010) suggest that 30 samples from the target population are reasonable for a pilot study.”
BackgroundSidek’s Module Development Model in the Adler Marital Therapy Module
Othman, M. H., Johari, K. S. K., & Amat, S. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i10/19102 · Cited by 3
“The determination of the number of samples of the pilot study according to Johanson and Brooks (2010) is between 10 and 40 people.”
MethodYunus, N., & Ismail, M. N. (2024) · International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems/International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4394-4406 · Cited by 3
“This is supported by [40], [41], who state that the ideal sample size for a pilot study should be between five and ten to thirty respondents.”
BackgroundChille, F. J., & Mollel, A. B. (2024) · Indonesian Journal of Social Research (IJSR) · doi:10.30997/ijsr.v6i1.421 · Cited by 3
“It is worth noting that pilot studies typically comprised 20 to 30 respondents (Johanson & Brooks, 2010).”
BackgroundAzis, N. M. N., Abdullah, R. N. R., Ayub, M. N. A. M., & Baharin, B. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-05478-5 · Cited by 3
“Following translation, the questionnaire underwent piloting with 30 participants, adhering to the methodology outlined by Johanson and Brooks [18].”
Tep, S., & Rosli, R. B. (2025) · Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE) · doi:10.37251/jske.v6i2.1483 · Cited by 3
“Subsequently, the questionnaire instrument underwent an initial pilot testing phase with 40 respondents to evaluate the reliability of its contents [48].”
Research Data Management in Kenya's Agricultural Research Institutes
Ng’eno, E. J., & Mutula, S. M. (2022) · Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9702-6.ch016 · Cited by 3
A pilot study of limb stimulation for the treatment of neonatal apnea
Dong, L., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, S. (2018) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000012827 · Cited by 3
The Preliminary Study on the Perception of Engineering Students on Blended Learning
Low, M. C., Lee, C. K., Sidhu, M. S., Hasan, Z., Lim, S. P., & Lim, S. C. (2021) · doi:10.1109/icoict52021.2021.9527444 · Cited by 4
Fadzil, A. H. P., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022) · Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.18844/cjes.v17i11.7792 · Cited by 3
“…because, as per Cooper and Schindler (2014) the suitable number of respondents in the pilot concentration goes from 25 to 100 individuals, while Johanson and Brooks (2010) recommend the base number is upwards of 30 individuals for a pilot concentrate on whose object is for beginning review or…”
BackgroundPostgraduate Students’ Perceived E-Learning Acceptance
Yatigammana, M. R. K. N., Johar, M. G. M., & Gunawardhana, C. (2013) · International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management · doi:10.4018/jabim.2013070105 · Cited by 3
García-Díaz, F. J., Cabello-Jaime, R., Conde, M. M., Bergera-Lezaun, I., Blanca-Barba, F., Herrero, J. M. C., del Cubo-Arroyo, J., Lupiáñez, E. D., Fernández-Sevilla-Leyva, A. B., Gálvez-Esquinas, J., et al. (2014) · Gerokomos · doi:10.4321/s1134-928x2014000300008 · Cited by 3
Ismail, M., 'Ainaa, S. F., Abdullah, Z., Shaharudin, M. R., & Zailani, S. H. M. (2015) · International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET) · doi:10.1109/istmet.2015.7359075 · Cited by 3
“[10] G. A. Johanson and G. P. Brooks, “Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies,” Educ.”
BackgroundDepression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) among Counselling Students: A Preliminary Study
Madihie, A., & Said, M. S. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development · doi:10.33736/jcshd.191.2015 · Cited by 3
“Kumaraswamy (2013) states that sudden change in the way of perceiving study skills, such as, theoretical and practical is one of the main factors of stress.”
BackgroundLavigne, M. B., Reeves, I., Sasseville, M.-J., & Loignon, C. (2017) · Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing · doi:10.1097/won.0000000000000310 · Cited by 3
Vittayakasemsont, K., Klaitong, C., Phukosi, K., Chavasit, V., Sinthusek, T., & Trachootham, D. (2019) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635581.2019.1578393 · Cited by 3
“Therefore, we planned to recruit at least 30 subjects as recommended sample size for pilot study (17).”
MethodWallbank, G., Sherrington, C., Hassett, L. M., Kwaśnicka, D., Chau, J. Y., Martin, F., Phongsavan, P., Grunseit, A. C., Canning, C. G., Baird, M., et al. (2020) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-020-00627-9 · Cited by 3
“There will be 60 community-dwelling females aged 50 years and over recruited for the pilot trial [48], allocated in equal numbers to the intervention and control groups.”
BackgroundMadjapuni, M. N., & Harun, J. (2017) · International Journal of Simulation Systems Science & Technology · doi:10.5013/ijssst.a.18.02.07 · Cited by 3
Sun, D., Looi, C., Yang, Y., & Sun, J. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.30191/ets.202010_23(4).0010 · Cited by 5
TurboHawk plaque rotation system for treatment of arteriosclerosis occlusion in lower extremities
Yuan, Z., Yang, B. R., Wang, J., An, H. S., & Xu, H. (2021) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000023976 · Cited by 3
Heng, C. S., & Hamid, N. A. A. (2021) · Research in Management of Technology and Business · Cited by 3
An Exploratory Study of Project Lead the Way Secondary Engineering Educators' Self-Efficacy
Holt, B. D. (2011) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 3
Crick, J. M. (2018) · Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) · Cited by 3
Jamsai, P. (2019) · Scholarship & Creative Works - Digital UNC a service of University Libraries (University of Northern Colorado) · Cited by 3
Awanis, S. (2013) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johanson, George A.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-18
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 394-400
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W1984294110
- Cited by
- 1,012
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 134 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Keywords
- pilot study, sample size determination, scale development, instrument development, item difficulty, item discrimination, internal consistency, response rate, parameter estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review