The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies
Abstract
Pilot studies are often recommended by scholars and consultants to address a variety of issues, including preliminary scale or instrument development. Specific concerns such as item difficulty, item discrimination, internal consistency, response rates, and parameter estimation in general are all relevant. Unfortunately, there is little discussion in the extant literature of how to determine appropriate sample sizes for these types of pilot studies. This article investigates the choice of sample size for pilot studies from a perspective particularly related to instrument development. Specific recommendations are made for researchers regarding how many participants they should use in a pilot study for initial scale development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Johanson & Brooks (2010) did recommend a sample size of 12 participants per arm for pilot trials.”
From A Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Dismantling Trial of the Efficacy of Self-As-Context During Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2021) · cites this paper as Johanson & Brooks (2010)
In the citing paper
“As the current study was below the average (Billingham etal., 2013) and below the recommended (Johanson & Brooks, 2010) sample size”
From A Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Dismantling Trial of the Efficacy of Self-As-Context During Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. (2021) · cites this paper as Johanson & Brooks, 2010
Citations
Cites
Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study
Julious, S. A. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.185 · Cited by 3,068
Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies
Hertzog, M. A. (2008) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20247 · Cited by 2,337
Handbook in research and evaluation
(1971) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(71)80129-6 · Cited by 1,488
Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference.
Aa, Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290969 · Cited by 1,365
Mooney, C., & Duval, R. (1993) · doi:10.4135/9781412983532 · Cited by 893
Statistical Inference for Coefficient Alpha
Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Salih, F. A. (1987) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168701100107 · Cited by 526
van Belle, G. (2002) · Wiley-Interscience eBooks · Cited by 461
Nelson, L. S. (2003) · Journal of Quality Technology · doi:10.1080/00224065.2003.11980200 · Cited by 422
WHAT SAMPLE SIZE is "ENOUGH" in INTERNET SURVEY RESEARCH?
Hill, R. L., & Hamilton, W. P. (1998) · Cited by 359
By Design: Planning Research on Higher Education.
Centra, J. A., Light, R. L., Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1991) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1982292 · Cited by 266
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Crocker, L., 1986, Classical and modern test theory
- Hill, R., 1998, Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6
- Lowry, R., 2008, VassarStats: Website for statistical calculation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 998
Self‐administered biofeedback treatment app for pediatric migraine: A randomized pilot study
Stubberud, A., Linde, M., Brenner, E., Heier, M., Olsen, A., Aamodt, A. H., Gravdahl, G. B., & Tronvik, E. (2020) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1974 · Cited by 13
Li, Y., Peng, C., Zhang, M., Xie, L., Gao, J., Ying-ji, W., Gao, Y., & Hou, L. (2022) · Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2022/4291477 · Cited by 14
“gov (NCT02608554) and compliant with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) [18] and CONSORT extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials [17].”
MethodInfluentialKannan, P., Cheing, G. L. Y., Fung, B., Li, J., Leung, W. C., Chung, R. C. K., Cheung, T. W., Lam, L. F., Lee, W. Y., Wong, W. C., et al. (2022) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.106991 · Cited by 13
Lister, K., Andrews, K., Buxton, J., Douce, C., & Seale, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076985 · Cited by 13
“The survey was piloted with 12 students (eight female, four male) in order to check the validity, particularly in terms of checking that the language was understandable, the questions were framed correctly and that there were no omissions in questions or multiple choice options (Johanson and Brooks, 2010).”
MethodLim, S. Y. J., & Vighnarajah, V. (2018) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/20185305005 · Cited by 13
Janchai, N., Baxter, G., & Srisaeng, P. (2020) · Academica Turistica · doi:10.26493/2335-4194.13.139-151 · Cited by 13
“Following the recommendations of Cargan (2007), Johanson and Brooks (2010), and Ruel et al. (2016), a pilot study to test the efficacy of the survey instrument was conducted.”
MethodBiersack, M. G., Hajdukiewicz, M. M., Uebelhack, R., Franke, L., Piazena, H., Klaus, P., Höhne-Zimmer, V., Braun, T., Buttgereit, F., Burmester, G. R., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159040 · Cited by 13
“Adapted from the description by Johanson and Brooks [45], we calculated that a sample size no larger than between 10 and 20 would be appropriate for our pilot study with a repeated measure design, if the expected effect sizes for 25(OH)D increase (Cohen’s d z ) would be between 1.0 and 0.7 with a…”
InfluentialStoyanova, S. Y., Ivantchev, N., Gergov, T. K., & Йорданова, Б. (2025) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports13100334 · Cited by 18
“Following Johanson and Brooks [76], only groups with ≥ 12 participants were compared, as this size is sufficient to detect strong effects ( r = 0.70) with 80% power at α = 0.05 [67] (p. 102).”
InfluentialKhoury, C. M. E., Choudhary, M., & Alam, A. F. A. (2023) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci13010017 · Cited by 14
Tran, H. T. D., & Kim, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15139972 · Cited by 12
“Johanson and Brooks [55] confirmed in their study that a reasonable minimum sample size for a pilot study is approximately 30 representative participants; thus, the sample size for the preliminary survey in this study is appropriate (N = 32).”
BackgroundHow Much g Is in the Distractor? Re-Thinking Item-Analysis of Multiple-Choice Items
Forthmann, B., Förster, N., Schütze, B., Hebbecker, K., Flessner, J., Peters, M. T., & Souvignier, E. (2020) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence8010011 · Cited by 12
Sotto-Santiago, S. M., Mac, J., Slaven, J. E., & Maldonado, M. E. D. L. C. (2021) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s311543 · Cited by 12
“Johnson & Brooks (2010) and Gliner, Morgan, and Leech (2009).(27,28) A higher response rate was pursued by reminder notices and increasing the open period of the survey.”
BackgroundMeasuring Using Disruptive Technology in the Supply Chain Context: Scale Development and Validation
Özkanlısoy, Ö., & Bulutlar, F. (2022) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer17040068 · Cited by 14
“A pilot study is suggested to handle the issue and predict the response rate and explore the feasibility of the study [58].”
BackgroundFormulating belongingness scale for higher education students – a pilot study
Metsälä, E., Heiskanen, E., & Kortelainen, M. (2012) · AMK-lehti // Journal of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences · Cited by 12
Shi, H., Du, X., Wu, F., Hu, Y., & Mi, W. (2020) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000021691 · Cited by 12
“necessary to assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for EPPNCD after VATL in elderly male patients with LC, this retrospective study included 80 patients (40 in each group) with an expected dropout rate of 20%.([28])”
BackgroundRahman, A. B. W. A., Hussain, M. A. M., & Zulkifli, R. M. (2020) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.7.10 · Cited by 12
“The total samples of the pilot study for both forms of the survey are based on the suggestion given by Johanson and Brooks (2010) who stated the total sample number of a pilot study must not be less than 30.”
MethodBhatt, J., Stoner, C. R., Scior, K., & Charlesworth, G. M. (2021) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01983-0 · Cited by 13
Sobgo, A. D. Z., Sun, L., Atingabili, S., Kewou, N. Y. N., & Tcheudjeu, A. T. (2025) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146281 · Cited by 15
Asempapa, B., & Asempapa, R. S. (2019) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019870782 · Cited by 11
Khalifah, R. A. A., McConnell, M., Nahari, A., Ravi, R., & Punthakee, Z. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2022.02.005 · Cited by 14
Williams, T. J. V., Tzani, C., Gavin, H., & Ιωάννου, Μ. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression · doi:10.1080/19434472.2023.2195466 · Cited by 11
Development and validation of the Complex Thinking Assessment Instrument (CTAI)
Pacheco, C. S., & Herrera, C. I. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101305 · Cited by 15
Alsulami, G., Rice, A. M., Kidd, L., O’Neill, A., Richards, K. C., & McPeake, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/1061-3749.27.3.e153 · Cited by 11
“Nevertheless, according to Nicolás et al. (2008), it is both a simple and cost-effective means of obtaining extensive information on patients’ sleep patterns.”
BackgroundMethodKim, J., Na, C.-S., Park, G.-C., & Lee, J.-S. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05038-6 · Cited by 11
Pre-service teachers’ autonomy in English language learning
Cabugsa, D. J. (2022) · Saudi Journal of Language Studies · doi:10.1108/sjls-03-2022-0025 · Cited by 11
Hatta, F. H. M., Samsudin, E. Z., Aimran, N., & Ismail, Z. (2023) · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · doi:10.2147/rmhp.s411335 · Cited by 13
“Thirty respondents based on the pre-determined criteria (Table 1) were recruited to answer each questionnaire.(39,41) The respondents were recruited from University Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Specialist Private Centre and Hospital Al-Sultan Abdullah, Selangor, Malaysia.”
MethodCalderón, C., Carrete, L., & Martínez, J. V. (2018) · Salud Pública de México · doi:10.21149/8838 · Cited by 11
Influential Factors for Effective Materials Management in Construction Projects
Jusoh, Z. M., Kasim, N. B., Ibrahim, M. U., Sarpin, N., Noh, H. M., & Zainal, R. (2018) · International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering Technology · doi:10.30880/ijscet.2018.09.02.005 · Cited by 11
Capital structure construct: a new approach to behavioral finance
Reyes, J. A. P., Miranda, M. R., & Martínez, J. V. (2019) · Investment Management and Financial Innovations · doi:10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.08 · Cited by 11
Relationships between bullies, victims and mental health issues among adolescents
Nasheeda, A., Hassan, N. C., & HASSAN, S. A. (2017) · The Maldives National Journal of Research · doi:10.62338/tfnapv21 · Cited by 12
“It is also important to select a sample for a pilot that is representative to the study (Johanson & Brooks, 2010; Thabane et al., 2010).”
BackgroundStudent Misbehaviors in Online Classrooms: Scale Development and Validation
Li, L., & Titsworth, S. (2015) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2015.994360 · Cited by 22
Hamid, N. A. A., Juhana, S., & Hazana, A. N. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.642 · Cited by 11
Mathibela, F. (2017) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 11
Tan, C. N.-L., Liu, D., Dou, J., & Chung, H. F. L. (2025) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-06-2025-0494 · Cited by 10
The Relationship Between Religious Orientation, Coping Strategies and Suicidal Behaviour
Ooi, M. Y., Rabbani, M., Yahya, A. N., & Siau, C. S. (2021) · OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying · doi:10.1177/00302228211005864 · Cited by 10
Piernas, J. M. P., & García, M. (2024) · European Public & Social Innovation Review · doi:10.31637/epsir-2024-595 · Cited by 28
Jalmasco, A. C., Loberes, J. M., & Lasala, N. J. (2025) · Journal of Basic Education Research · doi:10.37251/jber.v6i2.1480 · Cited by 10
Chen, Y., Li, R., Zhang, P., & Liu, X. (2019) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00513-5 · Cited by 11
“For scales with different numbers of items, the minimum sample size required was considerably different (Johanson and Brooks 2010).”
BackgroundWallbank, G., Sherrington, C., Hassett, L. M., Kwaśnicka, D., Chau, J. Y., Phongsavan, P., Grunseit, A. C., Martin, F., Canning, C. G., Baird, M., et al. (2022) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibab161 · Cited by 10
Makopoulou, K., Neville, R. D., & McLaughlin, K. (2020) · Research in Dance Education · doi:10.1080/14647893.2020.1754779 · Cited by 10
Predicting achievement in distance language learning: a structural equation model
Kızıl, A. Ş. (2020) · Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning · doi:10.1080/02680513.2020.1787819 · Cited by 10
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN INDUSTRY 4.0 ADAPTATION POTENTIAL SCALE (4IRAPS)
Sözbilir, F. (2021) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/tede.2021.14513 · Cited by 11
“The suggested sample size is 40 participants for a pilot study that aims to assess the adequacy of a scale (Isaac & Michael, 1995; Hertzog, 2008; Johanson & Brooks, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodKhan, N. A., Michalk, S., Sarachuk, K., & Javed, H. A. (2022) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies10060123 · Cited by 10
Hawaiʻi residents' perceptions of Kīlauea's 2018 eruption information
Goldman, R., Stovall, W. K., Damby, D. E., & McBride, S. K. (2023) · Volcanica · doi:10.30909/vol.06.01.1943 · Cited by 10
Ventista, O. M. (2017) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.335167 · Cited by 9
Lashayo, D. M., & Johar, M. G. M. (2018) · International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science · doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2018.03.04 · Cited by 10
“Johnson and Brooks in [50] and Yatigammana et al.”
Hey brand, let me take a selfie to get you out of the crisis
Raza, M., Khalid, R., & Raza, H. (2023) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights · doi:10.1108/jhti-05-2023-0334 · Cited by 9
Using Augmented Reality to Improve Tourism Marketing Effectiveness
Aggag, A., & Kortam, W. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17135747 · Cited by 16
Kırımer‐Aydınlı, F., Juárez-Castelán, M. A., Hakim, N., Gül, P., Unal, A. B., Aguayo‐Estremera, R., Fortis, A. P., Rojas-Russell, M. E., & Gallo, V. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08270-4 · Cited by 11
“This gap was present in most of the scales included in our review, despite both components being recognized as essential prerequisites for scale development (Fenn et al., 2020 ; Johanson & Brooks, 2010; Marczak et al., 2023b ; Voşki et al., 2023).”
Zheng, A., Zheng, F., Jin, K., Chi, M., Mu, J., Wei, H., Lei, J., & Xu, C. (2023) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s445770 · Cited by 9
Influencers of University Students’ Career Decision
Goh, M. Y. Y., & Jamaluddin, H. (2021) · Issues and Perspectives in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.33093/ipbss.2021.1.1.4 · Cited by 9
Campbell, J. M. (2011) · Cited by 9
Psychometric Evaluation of a Self-Medication Assessment Tool in an Elderly Population
Irvine-Meek, J., & Gould, O. N. (2011) · The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v64i1.982 · Cited by 9
Liou, S., Liu, H., Tsai, S.-L., Cheng, C., Yu, W.-C. W., & Chu, T. (2016) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000219 · Cited by 9
“This number met the recommendation that 30 participants are required as a minimum sample size for the psychometric test of initial tool development.(34) In addition, another group of 30 experienced registered nurses who were working at adult medical-surgical related units (ie, surgical or medical unit, emergency room,…”
MethodAn instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0
Friesen, E. L., Theodoros, D., & Russell, T. G. (2016) · Journal of Assistive Technologies · doi:10.1108/jat-12-2015-0037 · Cited by 9
Kacprzak, A., & Dziewanowska, K. (2019) · Journal of East European Management Studies · doi:10.5771/0949-6181-2019-4-513 · Cited by 9
“Keng et al. (2014) looked at how different experience realms influence product knowledge and brand attitude in the mp3 player market. Instead of using a survey, they applied an experimen‐ tal design and asked participants of the study to explore four different websites, which represented the four experiences realms. A…”
BackgroundMethodAlavi, ., Isa, K., & Palpanadan, S. T. (2020) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p261 · Cited by 10
“While Johanson and Brooks (2010) suggested that the minimum number of respondents for preliminary study for validating and developing a scale was 30 respondents.”
BackgroundCaminiti, M. F., Driesman, V., & deMontbrun, S. (2020) · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.06.005 · Cited by 9
Abbas, A., Sunguh, K. K., Arrona‐Palacios, A., & Hosseini, S. (2021) · Economics & Sociology · doi:10.14254/2071-789x.2021/14-3/1 · Cited by 9
Li, Y., Peng, C., Cao, G., Li, W., & Hou, L. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2893-z · Cited by 9
Development and initial psychometric properties of the mathematical modeling attitude scale
Asempapa, R. S. (2018) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12311 · Cited by 9
Norful, A. A., Ye, S., Shaffer, J. A., & Poghosyan, L. (2018) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/1061-3749.26.3.e127 · Cited by 9
A pilot study of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for the treatment of frozen shoulder
Cao, X.-Y., & Zhao, H.-Y. (2019) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000017632 · Cited by 9
“The desired sample size of this pilot study is 36, 18 patients each group, and assumed 20% dropout rate,([25]) which is the minimum required sample size to investigate the effectiveness of USGAP.”
Assessing Teachers’ Knowledge of Mathematical Modeling: Results from an Initial Scale Development
Asempapa, R. S. (2018) · Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.26711/007577152790017 · Cited by 9
“However, the sample size of 71 for this pilot study was deemed appropriate because a sample size between 15 and 75 is considered adequate for pilot studies (Converse & Presser, 1986; Johanson & Brooks, 2010).”
MethodSimpson, E., Forster, K., McMillan, S. S., & Anoopkumar‐Dukie, S. (2020) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-020-01734-0 · Cited by 9
Piper, K., Mitchell, M., Griffin, K., Morgan, T., Roy, A., Thomas, A., Pittock, L. J., Woznitza, N., Faruqui, R. A., & Sakel, M. (2020) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2020.10.016 · Cited by 9
Zhang, Q., Yue, J., Li, C.-R., & Sun, Z. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006423 · Cited by 9
“in each group) with an expected dropout rate of 20%.(24)”
BackgroundNguyen, T. M. L. (2015) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 9
The development and validation of a multidimensional organisational trust measure
Fischer, S., Walker, A., & Hyder, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189946 · Cited by 13
“The ideal number of participants for pilot testing measures ranges from 75 to 200 (Hertzog, 2008; Johanson and Brooks, 2010).”
BackgroundMgeni, M. S., Haji, H. A., Yunus, S. A. S., & Abdulla, A. A. (2024) · African Journal of Science Technology Innovation and Development · doi:10.1080/20421338.2023.2289248 · Cited by 8
“Besides, the researchers, in collaboration with instructors, guided the students on how to accurately fi ll out the survey questionnaire, following the suggestions outlined by Johanson and Brooks (2010) regarding pilot study procedures.”
MethodRosalina, K., & Jusoh, R. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241278455 · Cited by 21
“The pilot study (i.e., 60 respondents) was employed to overcome instrument reliability and validity issues (Johanson & Brooks, 2010; Memon et al., 2017).”
Zou, Z., Khan, A., Lwin, M., Alnajjar, F. S. K., & Mubin, O. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2024.1499165 · Cited by 8
Shatnawi, H. S., Alawneh, K., Alananzeh, O. A., Khasawneh, M. H. A., & Masa’deh, R. M. T. (2023) · GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites · doi:10.30892/gtg.50420-1138 · Cited by 15
Development and validation of a sustainable education scale
Tosun, F. Ç., & Söğüt, S. (2024) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2892 · Cited by 11
Gitiha, R. W., Rugano, P., Wakhu, S., & Ciriaka, M. G. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2310968 · Cited by 8
“Johanson and Brooks (2009) point out that in survey research, 10 – 30 participants should be considered for piloting research instruments.”
Salleh, M. C. M., Abdullah, N. I., & Razali, S. S. (2013) · Cited by 8
Spatial Orientation In Sportsmen
Stoyanova, S. Y., Ivantchev, N., & Petrova, K. (2016) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2016.v12n24p88 · Cited by 8
“For group comparisons, each group should consist of at least 12 members (Johanson & Brooks, 2010), so the national and regional competitors’ results could be compared in this study.”
ResultThe Educators’ Attitudes Toward Disability Scale (EADS): A Pilot Study
Freer, J. R. R. (2018) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2018.1426098 · Cited by 8
“Despite this major limitation, the overall sample size (n = 128) is acceptable for the purposes of a pilot study (Johanson & Brooks, 2010; Viechtbauer et al., 2015).”
MethodPoghosyan, L., Norful, A. A., Liu, J., & Shaffer, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/1061-3749.27.1.16 · Cited by 8
Liu, L. Q., Chapman, S., Deegan, R., Knight, S. L., Traynor, M., Allan, H. T., & Gall, A. (2020) · Journal of Tissue Viability · doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2020.05.002 · Cited by 8
Voß, H., Scholz-Kreisel, P., Richter, C., Ringel, F. A., Singer, S., & Renovanz, M. (2021) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02756-x · Cited by 8
Social Media Influencers and The Dietary Choices Among University Students
Ahmad, S. A., & Bruno, D. E. (2021) · Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) · doi:10.47405/mjssh.v6i10.1125 · Cited by 15
Children of Parents With a Mental Illness—Stigma Questionnaire: Development and Piloting
Dobener, L.-M., Stracke, M., Viehl, K., & Christiansen, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.800037 · Cited by 8
“Nevertheless, according to Johanson and Brooks (59), 30 representative participants from the population of interest suffice for a pilot study to test a new instrument in terms of preliminary item analyses, estimates of internal consistency and proportions of people responding to specific options.”
BackgroundHawley, G., Hepworth, J., Wilkinson, S. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2015) · Australian Journal of Primary Health · doi:10.1071/py14170 · Cited by 8
Evaluation of ethical codes implementation – a fuzzy approach
Ho, C., & Oladinrin, O. (2016) · Facilities · doi:10.1108/f-04-2015-0015 · Cited by 7
Intarasaksit, P., & Pitaksanurat, S. (2018) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.1080/10962247.2018.1536616 · Cited by 8
Self-Denigration in Doctoral Defense Sessions: Scale Development and Validation
Mayahi, N., & Jalilifar, A. (2021) · ESP Today · doi:10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.3 · Cited by 8
Electronic word-of-mouth in online brand communities: drivers and outcomes
Pasternak, O. (2017) · Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow) · Cited by 8
Exploring LLMs for Automated Generation and Adaptation of Questionnaires
Adhikari, D. M., Hartland, A., Weber, I. G., & Cannanure, V. K. (2025) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3719160.3736606 · Cited by 9
“However, resource constraints [71], participant availability [8, 37], and limited expert access [58] make pretesting difficult for new questionnaires or adapting existing questionnaires to different contexts.”
Achilleos, M., Merkouris, A., Charalambous, A., & Papastavrou, E. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039788 · Cited by 7
Risk factors of mortality among children under age five in Awi Zone, northwest Ethiopia
Alemu, Y., Mitiku, H. D., & Birara, M. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275659 · Cited by 7
Maznorbalia, A. S., Awalluddin, M. A., & Ayob, A. H. Y. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01631-z · Cited by 7
“Johanson and Brooks (2009) the best sample size for pilot research is 30.”
BackgroundChen, H., Tse, M. Y. M., Chung, J. W. Y., Yau, S. Y., & Wong, T. K. S. (2023) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04585-8 · Cited by 9
“The minimum required sample size was estimated to be 30 according to the recommended sampling choice for a preliminary study [15, 16].”
A digital positive psychology intervention for college student mental health and health behaviors
Biber, D., & Davis, A. (2024) · Mental Health and Digital Technologies · doi:10.1108/mhdt-02-2024-0007 · Cited by 8
Developing the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL)
Özer, E., & Güvenç, G. (2024) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06771-x · Cited by 7
“They were also asked to comment on difficulties in completing the scale and to offer suggestions for improvement, including specifying any additional item statements they felt were missing or items that should be deleted [30, 31].”
BackgroundHoller, R., & Werner, S. (2018) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.12555 · Cited by 7
Yusoff, H. M., Hamzah, M. I., & Surat, S. (2018) · Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia · doi:10.17576/jpen-2018-43.03-09 · Cited by 7
van Belle, E., Waal, G. H., Vermeulen, H., & Heinen, M. M. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12909 · Cited by 7
Stevens, S. C. W., Sood, S., Mertz, N., & Kostizak, K. (2020) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2020.541901 · Cited by 7
“The convention of using 30 individuals per group is common for pilot studies and thus was used in the present study (Johanson and Brooks, 2010).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johanson, George A.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-18
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 394-400
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W1984294110
- Cited by
- 1,012
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 134 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Keywords
- pilot study, sample size determination, scale development, instrument development, item difficulty, item discrimination, internal consistency, response rate, parameter estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review