Cited by 2,162Pro-Environmental Behavior and AttitudesEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsEconomic and Environmental Valuation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Value orientations, gender and environmental concern

Stern, Paul C., Dietz, Thomas, Kalof, Linda·1993·Environment and Behavior

Abstract

A social-psychological model is developed to examine the proposition that environmentalism represents a new way of thinking. It presumes that action in support of environmental quality may derive from any of three value orientations: egoistic, social-altruistic, or biospheric, and that gender may be implicated in the relation between these orientations and behavior. Behavioral intentions are modeled as the sum across values of the strength of a value times the strength of beliefs about the consequences of environmental conditions for valued objects. Evidence from a survey of 349 college students shows that beliefs about consequences for each type of valued object independently predict willingness to take political action, but only beliefs about consequences for self reliably predict willingness to pay through taxes. This result is consistent with other recent findings from contingent valuation surveys. Women have stronger beliefs than men about consequences for self, others, and the biosphere, but there is no gender difference in the strength of value orientations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013916593255002

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Armor, D. J., 1974, Sociological methodology, 17
  2. Arrow, K., 1975, Altnuism, mortality, and economic theory
  3. Dunlap, R. E., 1984, Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013
  4. George, D., 1986, Social Science Quarterly, 67, 722
  5. Griffin, S., 1978, Women and nature: The roaring inside her
  6. Heberlein, T. A., 1981, Zeitschrift for Umweltpolitik, 2, 241
  7. Jöreskog, K. G., 1988, PRELIS: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization
  8. McStay, J., 1983, International Journal of Women's Studies, 6, 291
  9. Mohai, P., 1985, Social Science Quarterly, 66, 820
  10. Offe, C., 1985, Social Research, 52, 817
  11. Slovic, P., annual meeting of the American Association of the Advancement of Science

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,162

Metadata

Authors
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L.
Affiliations
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
  • SUNY Plattsburgh (US)
Venue
Environment and Behavior
Published
1993-09
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
322-348
ISSN
  • 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-390X
OpenAlex
W2126789885
Cited by
2,162
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 104 · 2012: 88
FWCI
100.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environment and Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
value orientations, environmental concern, environmentalism, gender differences, egoistic values, biospheric values, willingness to pay, beliefs about consequences, contingent valuation, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review