The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intelligent Agent Transparency in Human–Agent Teaming for Multi-UxV Management
Open accessAbstract
Objective: We investigated the effects of level of agent transparency on operator performance, trust, and workload in a context of human–agent teaming for multirobot management. Background: Participants played the role of a heterogeneous unmanned vehicle (UxV) operator and were instructed to complete various missions by giving orders to UxVs through a computer interface. An intelligent agent (IA) assisted the participant by recommending two plans—a top recommendation and a secondary recommendation—for every mission. Method: A within-subjects design with three levels of agent transparency was employed in the present experiment. There were eight missions in each of three experimental blocks, grouped by level of transparency. During each experimental block, the IA was incorrect three out of eight times due to external information (e.g., commander’s intent and intelligence). Operator performance, trust, workload, and usability data were collected. Results: Results indicate that operator performance, trust, and perceived usability increased as a function of transparency level. Subjective and objective workload data indicate that participants’ workload did not increase as a function of transparency. Furthermore, response time did not increase as a function of transparency. Conclusion: Unlike previous research, which showed that increased transparency resulted in increased performance and trust calibration at the cost of greater workload and longer response time, our results support the benefits of transparency for performance effectiveness without additional costs. Application: The current results will facilitate the implementation of IAs in military settings and will provide useful data to the design of heterogeneous UxV teams.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“at least fve studies (see e.g., [4,130]) used the trust predisposition scale by McKnight et al. [91]”
From Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“However, we also noticed that only a few studies diferentiated between diferent subconstructs of trust (performance, process, purpose) which is inherently included in many scales (e.g., [91]) but authors did not make use of this information.”
From Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Critically, the opaqueness of the AI's internal computational processes may decrease calibrated reliance on the system [63 , 64] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Most of the studies investigated how to maintain appropriate trust calibration by continuously presenting system information to prevent over-trust or under-trust.”
From Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,730
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Endsley, M. R. (1995) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049543 · Cited by 8,875
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605 · cited 8×
“The opera- tor’s SA of the IA’s intent, reasoning, projected outcomes, and uncertainty should improve the operator’s subjective trust as well as trust calibration, which is proper reliance when the IA is correct and correct rejection when the IA is incorrect (Lee & See, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHumans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
Usability Evaluation In Industry
(1996) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781498710411 · Cited by 4,445
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195 · cited 1×
“…analysis (trust in the information and analysis displayed) and (b) decision and action selection (trust in the IA’s suggestions and decisions; Parasuraman, Sheridan, & Wickens, 2000), using a modified version of the Trust Between People and Automation questionnaire developed by Jian,…”
MethodWorking memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196772 · Cited by 2,882
Rayner, K. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210902816461 · Cited by 2,682
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Douglass S., 2013, Design recommendations for adaptive intelligent tutoring systems learner modeling, 1, 111
- Draper M, H, 2013, Realizing autonomy via intelligent adaptive hybrid control: Adaptable autonomy for achieving UxV RSTA team decision superiority
- Ekstrom R. B., 1976, Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests
- Helldin T., 2014, Transparency for future semi-automated systems
- Spriggs S., 2014, Fusion system overview
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 404
Emotion Appropriateness in Human–Drone Interaction
Herdel, V., & Cauchard, J. R. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01094-x · Cited by 8
Quantifying Human Decision-Making: Implications for Bidirectional Communication in Human-Robot Teams
Schaefer, K. E., Perelman, B. S., Brewer, R. W., Wright, J. L., Roy, N., & Aksaray, D. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91581-4_27 · Cited by 9
Automation reliability and trust: A Bayesian inference approach
Wang, C., Zhang, C., & Yang, X. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621048 · Cited by 9
Emotional expressions facilitate human–human trust when using automation in high-risk situations
Feng, J., Sanchez, J., Sall, R. J., Lyons, J. B., & Nam, C. S. (2019) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995605.2019.1630227 · Cited by 9
Human-Agent Team Game Analysis Framework: Case Studies
Sepich, N. C., Dorneich, M. C., & Gilbert, S. B. (2021) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181321651188 · Cited by 9
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the flight deck: Enhancing human-AI teamwork in aviation
Korentsides, J. M., Merwin, E. R., Berger, L., Laskey, L., Winter, S. R., Sobel, B. M., & Keebler, J. R. (2025) · Journal of the Air Transport Research Society · doi:10.1016/j.jatrs.2025.100099 · Cited by 11
Towards a Framework for Improving Transparency in the Software Engineering Process
Isong, B. E., Ofem, P. O., & Lugayizi, F. L. (2022) · International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering · doi:10.1109/icste57415.2022.00011 · Cited by 8
Here’s Looking at You, Robot: The Transparency Conundrum in HRI
Lee, M., Ruijten, P. A. M., Frank, L. E., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309653 · Cited by 9
Operationalized Intent for Communication in Human-Agent Teams
Schneider, M. F., & Miller, M. E. (2018) · IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) · doi:10.1109/cogsima.2018.8423992 · Cited by 8
Exploring the impact of transparency on the interaction with an in-car digital AI assistant
Neuhaus, R., Laschke, M., Theofanou-Fülbier, D., Hassenzahl, M., & Sadeghian, S. (2019) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3349263.3351325 · Cited by 8
The Effect of AI Teammate Ethicality on Trust Outcomes and Individual Performance in Human-AI Teams
Schelble, B. G., Lancaster, C., Duan, W., Mallick, R., McNeese, N. J., & Lopez, J. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.040 · Cited by 8
Lee, S. (2022) · PDXScholar (Portland State University) · doi:10.15760/etd.7865 · Cited by 9
Understanding Automation Failure
Endsley, M. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434231222059 · Cited by 6
Gaze-informed signatures of trust and collaboration in human-autonomy teams
Ries, A. J., Aroca-Ouellette, S., Roncone, A., & de Visser, E. J. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100171 · Cited by 8
Gentile, D., Donmez, B., & Jamieson, G. A. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103434 · Cited by 8
Min, C., Jin, Q., Zhou, J., & Luo, X. (2025) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01255-0 · Cited by 11
Sun, L., Li, Z., Zhou, Z., Lou, S., Li, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing · doi:10.1017/s0890060422000270 · Cited by 7
Xu, X., Yu, R., Yuan, M., & Zheng, J. (2025) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2025.2456535 · Cited by 6
Five Requisites for Human-Agent Decision Sharing in Military Environments
Barnes, M., Chen, J. Z.-J., Schaefer, K. E., Kelley, T. D., Giammanco, C. A., & Hill, S. G. (2016) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41959-6_4 · Cited by 7
Self-citationXue, C., Zhang, H., & Cao, H. (2024) · Systems Science & Control Engineering · doi:10.1080/21642583.2024.2343301 · Cited by 9
Human-agent bidirectional transparency
Barnes, M. J., Wang, N., Pynadath, D. V., & Chen, J. Y. C. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00010-1 · Cited by 7
Self-citationTrust of Learning Systems: Considerations for Code, Algorithms, and Affordances for Learning
Lyons, J. B., Ho, N., Friedman, J., Alarcon, G. M., & Guznov, S. Y. (2018) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90403-0_13 · Cited by 7
Dutta, P., Josan, P. K., Wong, R. K. W., Dunbar, B. J., Diaz‐Artiles, A., & Selva, D. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434251338433 · Cited by 8
Souza, G. H. C., Wanderley, C. D. A., & de Aguiar, A. B. (2025) · Journal of Management Control · doi:10.1007/s00187-025-00396-7 · Cited by 10
Gong, X., & Sun, P. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115875 · Cited by 7
Design Thinking Framework for Integration of Transparency Measures in Time-Critical Decision Support
Stone, P. B., Jessup, S. A., Ganapathy, S., & Harel, A. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2068745 · Cited by 7
The Impact of System Transparency on Passenger’s Quality of Experience in Highly Automated Driving
Li, C., Wang, Z., Yang, B., Guan, M., Huang, C., & Nakano, K. (2023) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/iv55152.2023.10186700 · Cited by 6
Social Robots as Intentional Agents
Thellman, S. (2021) · Linköping studies in arts and science · doi:10.3384/diss.diva-178806 · Cited by 7
Hide-and-Seek: A Template for Explainable AIPreprint
Tagaris, T., & Stafylopatis, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.00130 · Cited by 9
Zakershahrak, M., & Ghodratnama, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.11792 · Cited by 6
Contemporary Issues and Advances in Human–Robot Collaborations
Hatanaka, T., Yamauchi, J., Fujita, M., & Handa, H. (2023) · doi:10.1002/9781119857433.ch14 · Cited by 6
Ding, Y., Jia, L., & Du, N. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2025.3558437 · Cited by 6
Schelble, B. G., Mallick, R., Hauptman, A. I., & McNeese, N. J. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2528988 · Cited by 7
Schelble, B. G., Textor, C., Zhang, R., Lopez, J., Taverez, N., Ku, C., McNeese, N. J., Pak, R., Freeman, G., Tossell, C. C., et al. (2025) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2025.2570300 · Cited by 5
Anshima, Bhardwaj, B., & Sharma, D. (2026) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-025-00581-x · Cited by 10
A Bayesian Network Approach to Explainable Reinforcement Learning with Distal Information
Milani, R., Moll, M., Leone, R. D., & Pickl, S. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23042013 · Cited by 5
Lee, S. (2024) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x241268464 · Cited by 5
Aviation displays: Design for automation and new display formats
Chaparro, A., Miranda, A. T., & Grubb, J. D. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-420139-2.00014-9 · Cited by 5
How Terminology Affects Users’ Responses to System Failures
Candrian, C., & Scherer, A. (2023) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/00187208231202572 · Cited by 5
Patton, C. E., Wickens, C. D., Smith, C. A. P., Noble, K. M., & Clegg, B. A. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00519-5 · Cited by 5
Safety, Trust, and Ethics Considerations for Human-AI Teaming in Aerospace Control
Hobbs, K. L., & Li, B. (2024) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2024-2583 · Cited by 5
Displaced Interactions in Human-Automation Relationships: Transparency over Time
Miller, C. A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91122-9_17 · Cited by 5
Sun, L., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Lou, S., & Zhou, Z. (2021) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451819 · Cited by 7
When Transparency Fails: Compliance with Decision Support in Nautical Collision Avoidance
Pharmer, R. L., Wickens, C. D., & Clegg, B. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661321 · Cited by 5
Simon, L., Rauffet, P., & Guérin, C. (2024) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-024-00782-6 · Cited by 3
Ferguson, Y., Rodriguez, D., Chabanet, D., & Richard, D. (2024) · Question(s) de management · doi:10.3917/qdm.229.0131 · Cited by 4
Fan-Out Revisited: The Impact of the Human Element on Scalability of Human Multi-Robot Teams
Perkins, L. D., Johnson, M., Sevil, H. E., & Goodrich, M. A. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11128358 · Cited by 4
Human-agent collaborations : trust in negotiating control
Daronnat, S., Azzopardi, L. A., Halvey, M. J., & Dubiel, M. (2019) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 4
Rajabiyazdi, F., Jamieson, G. A., & Guanolusia, D. Q. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_84 · Cited by 4
Adaptive Event Driven Framework for Real Time Multi-Agent Missions
Bonache-Seco, J. A., Lopez-Orozco, J. A., Besada-Portas, E., & Risco‐Martín, J. L. (2018) · International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT) · doi:10.1109/distra.2018.8600998 · Cited by 4
Investigating Self-Rationalizing Models for Commonsense Reasoning
Rancourt, F., Vondrlik, P., Maupomé, D., & Meurs, M. (2023) · Stats · doi:10.3390/stats6030056 · Cited by 5
Stensrud, R., Mikkelsen, B., & Valaker, S. (2024) · Human-Intelligent Systems Integration · doi:10.1007/s42454-024-00050-y · Cited by 4
Transparent systems, opaque results: a study on automation compliance and task performance
Pharmer, R. L., Wickens, C. D., & Clegg, B. A. (2025) · Cognitive Research · doi:10.1186/s41235-025-00619-4 · Cited by 2
Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Urban Planning and Management
Sao, R. N., Chandak, S. J., Bhadade, P., & Wadhwani, K. S. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9410-6.ch011 · Cited by 4
Artificial Intelligence Paradigms and Agent-Based Technologies
Macedo, L. (2025) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61375-3_3 · Cited by 6
VAE-CE: Visual Contrastive Explanation Using Disentangled VAEs
Poels, Y., & Menkovski, V. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01333-1_19 · Cited by 4
Assessing the Decision-Making Process in Human-Robot Collaboration Using a Lego-like EEG Headset
Tsao, C.-C., Chuang, H.-H., Tsao, T.-H., Tang, C.-Y., Chang, Y.-W., Chu, C.-L., Sung, C.-C., Hsieh, C.-L., Lin, Y.-P., & Chien, S.-Y. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.191 · Cited by 4
Accelerating Understanding of Human Response to Automation Failure
Loft, S. D. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434241234108 · Cited by 4
YOKOYAMA, S., & Imai, J. (2021) · International Journal of Affective Engineering · doi:10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-20-00036 · Cited by 4
Dikmen, M., Li, Y., Ho, G., Farrell, P. S. E., Cao, S. C., & Burns, C. M. (2020) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9282913 · Cited by 4
Towards a Deeper Understanding of Automation Transparency in the Operation of Nuclear Plants
Skraaning, G., USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Jamieson, G. A., & Joe, J. C. (2020) · doi:10.2172/1668828 · Cited by 4
Transparent Communications for Human–Machine Teaming
Chen, J. Y. C. (2023) · doi:10.1002/9781119863663.ch10 · Cited by 4
Self-citationSelf-assessment in machines boosts human Trust
Warmsley, D., Choudhary, K., Rego, J., Viani, E., & Pilly, P. K. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1557075 · Cited by 3
Reasoning with AI: Six Essential Factors for Augmenting Human Expertise in the Workplace
Koon, S. (2025) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-83512-4_6 · Cited by 4
Adaptive event driven framework for real time multi-agent missions
Bonache-Seco, J. A., Orozco, J. A. L., Besada-Portas, E., & Risco‐Martín, J. L. (2018) · International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT) · doi:10.5555/3330299.3330333 · Cited by 3
WHERE: Humans, Technology, and Humane Technology
Walther, C. C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67823-3_2 · Cited by 4
Trustworthiness Assessment of an Adaptive and Explainable Robot in a Real Environment
Cantucci, F., Marini, M., & Falcone, R. (2025) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01257-y · Cited by 3
Tatasciore, M., Bennett, L., Bowden, V. K., Bell, J., Visser, T. A. W., McAnally, K. I., McCarley, J. S., Thompson, M. B., Shanahan, C., Morris, R. A., et al. (2025) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208251349269 · Cited by 3
Shukla, D., & Singh, M. (2025) · Prabandhan Indian Journal of Management · doi:10.17010/pijom/2025/v18i8/173901 · Cited by 12
Artificial Intelligence and Human-Robot Teaming
Deng, X. N. (2020) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2355-1.ch005 · Cited by 3
A Machine Learning-Based Micro-World Platform for Condition-Based Maintenance
Guanolusia, D. Q., Rajabiyazdi, F., & Jamieson, G. A. (2020) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283448 · Cited by 3
Miller, C., Barber, D. J., Holder, E. W., Huang, L., Lyons, J. B., Roth, E. M., & Wauck, H. C. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192272 · Cited by 3
Self-citationModelling situated intent for human-autonomy teaming: a human-centric approach
Hammarbäck, J., Johansson, B. J. E., Alfredson, J., & Lundberg, J. (2024) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2024.2337683 · Cited by 3
SUZUMURA, Y., & Imai, J. (2022) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2021hcp0006 · Cited by 3
Human-Agent Teaming for Effective Multirobot Management: Effects of Agent Transparency
Barnes, M. J., Chen, J. Y. C., Wright, J. L., & Stowers, K. L. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40030-3_18 · Cited by 3
Self-citationA Social Science-based Approach to Explanations for (Game) AI
Volz, V., Majchrzak, K., & Preuß, M. (2018) · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG) · doi:10.1109/cig.2018.8490361 · Cited by 3
Human-Autonomy Teaming with Learning Capable Agents: Performance and Workload Outcomes
Wright, J. L., Lee, J., & Schreck, J. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79763-8_1 · Cited by 3
Trusted Partners: Human-Machine Teaming and the Future of Military AI
Konaev, M., Huang, T. C., & Chahal, H. (2021) · doi:10.51593/20200024 · Cited by 4
Enabling Human‐Aware Autonomy Through Cognitive Modeling and Feedback Control
Jain, N., Reid, T., Akash, K., Yuh, M. S., & Hunter, J. G. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119857433.ch5 · Cited by 3
Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management Through a Bibliometric Lens
Anayat, S. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6507-6.ch007 · Cited by 2
Smith, M. K., Kracinovich, A. R., Schrom, B. J., & Dunn, T. L. (2025) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-025-00638-1 · Cited by 2
Examining the Role of AI Information-Sharing on Trust in Human-AI Teams
Schelble, B. G., Filer, G., Flathmann, C., & Madathil, K. C. (2025) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813251367726 · Cited by 2
Investigating the Role of Uncertainty in Scalability of Human Multi-Robot Teams
Perkins, L. D., Sevil, H. E., & Johnson, M. (2025) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man63969.2025.11217559 · Cited by 2
Navigating the intellectual terrain of AI–HRM integration: a bibliometric review (2000–2024)
Usman, M. B., Naveed, S., Nazeer, S., Siddique, N., & Rana, A. H. (2026) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-08-2025-0670 · Cited by 7
Simon, L., Rauffet, P., & Guerin, C. (2026) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-026-00890-5 · Cited by 2
Agent Transparency for Human-Autonomy Teaming
Chen, J. Y. C., & Barnes, M. J. (2022) · Automation, collaboration, and e-services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10788-7_15 · Cited by 3
Self-citationDaronnat, S., Azzopardi, L. A., & Halvey, M. J. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661498 · Cited by 2
Task Delegation from AI to Humans: The Impact of AI Transparency on Human Performance
Wang, Y., Jiang, Y., Tang, J., & Zhou, X. (2024) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60324-2_24 · Cited by 3
Zhang, J., You, F., Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, P., Wang, H., & Luximon, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2440985 · Cited by 2
Interface design for visual blind spots in cooperative driving
Liu, B., Zhang, J., & Luximon, Y. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2500448 · Cited by 2
Welzel, A., Wohlrab, R., & Obaid, M. (2025) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3765766.3765786 · Cited by 2
Good Choices: Technological and Ethical Considerations to Increase Trust in UASs
Coulter, C., & Haring, K. S. (2020) · International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) · doi:10.1109/icuas48674.2020.9213978 · Cited by 2
Enhancing Transparency in Human-autonomy Teaming via the Option-centric Rationale Display
Luo, R., Du, N., Huang, K. Y., & Yang, X. J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181319631366 · Cited by 2
Chy, M. T. I. (2024) · American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions · doi:10.63125/kwfvzw68 · Cited by 15
Wenskovitch, J. E., Jefferson, B. A., Anderson, A., Baweja, J. A., Ciesielski, D., & Fallon, C. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.897295 · Cited by 2
Greenyer, J., Lochau, M., & Vogel, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.11851 · Cited by 5
Du, N., Haspiel, J., Zhang, Q., Tilbury, D. M., Pradhan, A. K., Yang, X. J., & Robert, L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.08878 · Cited by 2
INTO THE BLACK BOX: DESIGNING FOR TRANSPARENCY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Vorm, E. S. (2019) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.12257.33120 · Cited by 2
Exploratory Team Cognition and Resilience in Human Agent Teaming
Lematta, G. J. (2019) · Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.24209.58727 · Cited by 2
Transparency in Multi-Human Multi-Robot InteractionPreprint
Patel, J., Ramaswamy, T., Li, Z., & Pinciroli, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.10495 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mercado, J. E., Rupp, M. A., Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M. J., Barber, D., & Procci, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mercado, Joseph E.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-02-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 401-415
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2321972046
- Semantic Scholar
- 5161e7babcca03e87642f3a130c2d25e338bde9a
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 48.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Keywords
- agent transparency, human-agent teaming, unmanned vehicles, intelligent agents, trust in automation, operator workload, operator performance, usability, military operations, heterogeneous robot teams, trust calibration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
