The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intelligent Agent Transparency in Human–Agent Teaming for Multi-UxV Management
Open accessAbstract
Objective: We investigated the effects of level of agent transparency on operator performance, trust, and workload in a context of human–agent teaming for multirobot management. Background: Participants played the role of a heterogeneous unmanned vehicle (UxV) operator and were instructed to complete various missions by giving orders to UxVs through a computer interface. An intelligent agent (IA) assisted the participant by recommending two plans—a top recommendation and a secondary recommendation—for every mission. Method: A within-subjects design with three levels of agent transparency was employed in the present experiment. There were eight missions in each of three experimental blocks, grouped by level of transparency. During each experimental block, the IA was incorrect three out of eight times due to external information (e.g., commander’s intent and intelligence). Operator performance, trust, workload, and usability data were collected. Results: Results indicate that operator performance, trust, and perceived usability increased as a function of transparency level. Subjective and objective workload data indicate that participants’ workload did not increase as a function of transparency. Furthermore, response time did not increase as a function of transparency. Conclusion: Unlike previous research, which showed that increased transparency resulted in increased performance and trust calibration at the cost of greater workload and longer response time, our results support the benefits of transparency for performance effectiveness without additional costs. Application: The current results will facilitate the implementation of IAs in military settings and will provide useful data to the design of heterogeneous UxV teams.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“at least fve studies (see e.g., [4,130]) used the trust predisposition scale by McKnight et al. [91]”
From Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“However, we also noticed that only a few studies diferentiated between diferent subconstructs of trust (performance, process, purpose) which is inherently included in many scales (e.g., [91]) but authors did not make use of this information.”
From Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Critically, the opaqueness of the AI's internal computational processes may decrease calibrated reliance on the system [63 , 64] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“Most of the studies investigated how to maintain appropriate trust calibration by continuously presenting system information to prevent over-trust or under-trust.”
From Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,730
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Endsley, M. R. (1995) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049543 · Cited by 8,875
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605 · cited 8×
“The opera- tor’s SA of the IA’s intent, reasoning, projected outcomes, and uncertainty should improve the operator’s subjective trust as well as trust calibration, which is proper reliance when the IA is correct and correct rejection when the IA is incorrect (Lee & See, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHumans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
Usability Evaluation In Industry
(1996) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781498710411 · Cited by 4,445
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195 · cited 1×
“…analysis (trust in the information and analysis displayed) and (b) decision and action selection (trust in the IA’s suggestions and decisions; Parasuraman, Sheridan, & Wickens, 2000), using a modified version of the Trust Between People and Automation questionnaire developed by Jian,…”
MethodWorking memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196772 · Cited by 2,882
Rayner, K. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210902816461 · Cited by 2,682
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Douglass S., 2013, Design recommendations for adaptive intelligent tutoring systems learner modeling, 1, 111
- Draper M, H, 2013, Realizing autonomy via intelligent adaptive hybrid control: Adaptable autonomy for achieving UxV RSTA team decision superiority
- Ekstrom R. B., 1976, Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests
- Helldin T., 2014, Transparency for future semi-automated systems
- Spriggs S., 2014, Fusion system overview
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 404
Hoffman, R., Klein, G., Mueller, S. T., & Clancey, W. J. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/z3yek · Cited by 2
Rosenbaum, G. M., Goren, A., Shermohammed, M., Wolk, D. M., Tice, A. M., Doyle, J. J., Meyer, M. N., & Chabris, C. F. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vtxza · Cited by 2
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Transparency and Driver Performance Effects
Deng, Y., & KABER, D. B. (2023) · doi:10.1002/9781119863663.ch25 · Cited by 2
Human-Agent Teaming: A System-Theoretic OverviewPreprint
Meimandi, K. J., Bolton, M. L., & Beling, P. A. (2024) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.170629550.02125312/v1 · Cited by 2
Panchanadikar, R., & Freeman, G. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790869 · Cited by 3
Model Blindness II: Investigating a Model-Based Recommender System’s Impact on Decision Making
Parmar, S., Illingworth, D. A., & Thomas, R. P. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192247 · Cited by 1
Level of detail in visualization for human autonomy teaming: Speed, accuracy, and workload effects
Wang, T., & Lau, N. K. C. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231193673 · Cited by 1
To Split or Not to Split? Evaluating IA Roles Providing Knowledge and Emotional Support
Zhao, J., Rau, P. P., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60901-5_14 · Cited by 1
Research on transparency design based on shared situation awareness in semiautomatic driving
You, F., Deng, H., Hansen, P., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-23606-8.00008-7 · Cited by 1
Daschner, S., & Obermaier, R. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.70001 · Cited by 2
Trust Calibration in Augmented Reality-based Decision Support Systems
Konopka, B., Hönemann, K., & Wiesche, M. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Business Informatics · doi:10.1109/cbi62504.2024.00028 · Cited by 2
Position Paper: Trust, Teamwork and Digital Twins
Pollick, F. E., Bailey, M. E., Kim, J., Freeth, M., Miller, M., & Naidoo, L. (2025) · ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Cyber-Physical Systems (SaT-CPS) · doi:10.1145/3716816.3727976 · Cited by 1
The benefits of automation transparency are dependent on human attention control capacity
Gegoff, I., Tatasciore, M., Bowden, V. K., & Loft, S. D. (2025) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104619 · Cited by 2
Zou, Y.-Y., & Borst, C. (2025) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-025-00826-5 · Cited by 2
Wang, F.-H. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt64023.2025.00072 · Cited by 1
Jiang, C., Zhou, T., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2025) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2025.3636860 · Cited by 1
Cai, Y., & Rau, P. P. (2026) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104738 · Cited by 1
Lim, Y., Hong, J., Jeon, G., & Lee, S. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2643367 · Cited by 1
Zou, X., & Rau, P. P. (2026) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208261450138 · Cited by 2
How transparency impacts trust in teleoperated autonomous robots under uncertainty
Min, C., Gao, K., Ji, Z., & Xu, X. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103877 · Cited by 1
You, F., Ji, X., Fu, Q., Shu, Y., Hansen, P., & Wang, J. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2689522 · Cited by 1
Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2026.108676 · Cited by 1
The Advanced Exploitation of Mixed Reality (AEMR) Community of Interest
Rodas, M. O., Waters, J., & Rousseau, D. (2016) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40542-1_14 · Cited by 1
UI-Design and Evaluation for Human-Robot-Teaming in Infantry Platoons
Westhoven, M., Lassen, C., Trautwein, I., Remmersmann, T., & Brüggemann, B. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58475-1_12 · Cited by 2
Operator Trust Function for Predicted Drone Arrival
Trujillo, A. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_1 · Cited by 1
ART-GCS: An Adaptive Real-Time Multi-Agent Ground Control Station
Bonache-Seco, J. A., Orozco, J. A. L., Besada-Portas, E., & Risco‐Martín, J. L. (2019) · Spring Simulation Multiconference · doi:10.23919/springsim.2019.8732874 · Cited by 1
Transparent Shepherding: A Rule-Based Learning Shepherd for Human Swarm Teaming
Debie, E., Rojas, R. F., Fidock, J. J. T., Barlow, M., Kasmarik, K., Anavatti, S. G., Garratt, M., & Abbass, H. A. (2020) · Unmanned system technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60898-9_12 · Cited by 1
New teams on the flight deck: Humans and context-sensitive information automation
Burian, B. K., Mosier, K. L., Fischer, U. M., & Kochan, J. A. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-420139-2.00008-3 · Cited by 2
King, J. M., Hough, A. R., & Collins, M. G. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661238 · Cited by 1
‘Try this Because’: The Effect of Positive Framing in Robo-Advisors
Kim, E., Heo, J., & Lee, J. (2022) · [ ] With Design: Reinventing Design Modes · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_189 · Cited by 1
Necessity of Self-explainability in AI: Insights from the Existing Social Projects
Jadhav, M., Laddha, S., & Kabra, S. M. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0483-9_20 · Cited by 1
Amino, K. I. T. A., & Imai, J. (2023) · Transactions of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering · doi:10.5057/jjske.tjske-d-23-00004 · Cited by 1
Tambwekar, P., Dodeja, L., Vaska, N., Xu, W., & Gombolay, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.853 · Cited by 1
Towards a Framework for Interdisciplinary Studies in Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Ziethmann, P., Stieler, F., Pfrommer, R., Schlögl-Flierl, K., & Bauer, B. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60606-9_18 · Cited by 1
Between Trust and Identity: Form, Function, and Presentation
Lee, M., McMillan, D., Torre, I., Fischer, J. E., & Ruitenburg, Y. (2024) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3640794.3669999 · Cited by 1
Stensrud, R., Nummedal, O. R., & Valaker, S. (2024) · Human-Intelligent Systems Integration · doi:10.1007/s42454-024-00058-4 · Cited by 1
Trust in Sensing Technologies and Human Wingmen: Analogies for Human-Machine Teams
Lyons, J. B., Ho, N., Hoffmann, L. C., Sadler, G. G., Abel, A. L. V., & Wilkins, M. A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91470-1_13 · Cited by 1
Interrogating the Black Box: Transparency through Information-Seeking Dialogues
Tubella, A. A., Theodorou, A. A., & Nieves, J. C. (2021) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.65109/onbl7454 · Cited by 1
Evaluating a virtual human storyteller for improved decision support
Blackmore, K., Smith, S., Nesbitt, K., North, L., Wark, S., & Nowina-Krowicki, M. (2019) · MODSIM · doi:10.36334/modsim.2019.b2.blackmore · Cited by 1
Tangibilité et engagement dans un comportement environnemental : Vers une étude longitudinale
Bouzékri, E., & Rivière, G. (2022) · doi:10.1145/3502178.3529110 · Cited by 1
Explanation of Reinforcement Learning Model in Dynamic Multi-Agent SystemPreprint
Wang, X., Li, H., Zhang, H., Lewis, M. A., & Sycara, K. P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.01508 · Cited by 6
Aygun, A., Nguyen, T. D., & Scheutz, M. J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.29.582708 · Cited by 1
Developing human-autonomy teaming characteristics and guidance in aerospace operations
Tokadlı, G. (2021) · doi:10.31274/td-20240329-223 · Cited by 1
Niveaux d'automatisation adaptables pour une coopération homme-robots
Habib, L. (2019) · doi:10.70675/61fe21a5z7e1fz442cza48bzac1a19d65a16 · Cited by 1
Human-Agent Collaborative Decision-Making Framework for Naval Systems
Rodas, M. O., Waters, J., & Putnam, C. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91584-5_29
Reducción de la carga de trabajo del operador en un centro de control adaptativo multi-vehículo
Bonache-Seco, J. A., Orozco, J. A. L., Besada-Portas, E., Jiménez-Castellanos, J. F., & Girón-Sierra, J. M. (2019) · Jornadas de Automática · doi:10.17979/spudc.9788497497169.016
Enhancing autonomy transparency: an option-centric rationale approachPreprint
Luo, R., Du, N., & Yang, X. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.01051
Infraestructura para estudiar adaptabilidad y transparencia en el centro de control versatil
Seco, J. A. B., Orozco, J. A. L., Besada-Portas, E., & García, J. M. D. L. C. (2017) · Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) · doi:10.17979/spudc.9788497497749.0203
Norman, S. R. (2020) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania)
Perelman, B. S., Lakhmani, S. G., & Wright, J. L. (2020)
Moradhaseli, H., & Monfared, J. H. (2020) · Journal of Information Systems and Telecommunication (JIST) · doi:10.29252/jist.8.30.105 · Cited by 1
Wan, Y. (2019) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
An Approach to Modeling Simulated Military Human-agent Teaming
Hidalgo, M. (2020) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Centro de control versátil para equipos de vehículos heterogéneos: estado actual y mejoras futuras
Bonache-Seco, J. A., Orozco, J. A. L., Besada-Portas, E., & García, J. M. D. L. C. (2022) · Jornadas de Automática · doi:10.17979/spudc.9788497498081.0979
ART-GCS : an Adaptive Real-Time Multi-Agent Ground Control Station
Bonache-Seco, J. A., Lopez-Orozco, J. A., Besada-Portas, E., & Risco-Martín, J. L. (2019) · Annual Simulation Symposium (ANSS) · doi:10.22360/springsim.2019.anss.013
IA, robotique, automatisation : quelles évolutions pour l’activité humaine ?
Haradji, Y., Zouinar, M., Delgoulet, C., & Morais, A. (2020) · Activites · doi:10.4000/activites.4929
Measures of Attention in Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Multi-Vehicle Supervision
Glavan, J. J., Bass, E. J., Adams, J. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) · doi:10.1109/ichms56717.2022.9980754 · Cited by 1
Estimating Causal Responsibility for Explaining Autonomous Behavior
Mahmud, S., Nashed, S. B., Goldman, C. V., & Zilberstein, S. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40878-6_5
Towards a Comprehensive Model of Military Human-Agent Teaming
Hidalgo, M., & Jones, L.-R. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192436
Dynamic Strategy Selection under Bounded Rationality in Constrained Optimization ProblemsPreprint
Diego‐Rosell, P., Thomas, R. P., & Maese, E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4648062
Human-Robot Collaboration: From the Perspective of Systems and Control
Yamauchi, J., & Hatanaka, T. (2024) · Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan · doi:10.7210/jrsj.42.99
McCarley, J. S., Knight, M., & Fletcher, K. I. (2024) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2024.2386562
Robot transparency and anthropomorphic attribute effects on human-robot interactions
Wang, J., Liu, Y., Yue, T., Wang, C., Mao, J., Wang, Y., & You, F. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-23606-8.00020-8
Design of proactive interaction of in-vehicle robots based transparency
Wang, J., Yue, T., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, C., Yan, F., & You, F. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-23606-8.00021-x
Decision-Making Aid for Human-Machine Teaming in Multiplayer Pursuit-Evasion Games
Sachidanandam, S. O., Honarvar, S., Elliott, D. S., Hicks, G., & Diaz-Mercado, Y. J. (2025) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2025-2272
Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management Using Bibliometric Analysis
Ng, W. C., Ravesangar, K., Toh, G. G., & Soong, Y. Q. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9395-6.ch016
Willingness to work as a predictor of human-agent team success
Gurney, N., Pynadath, D. V., & Miller, J. H. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1405436
Transparency-Based Action (TBA) Model for a Simulated Teleoperated Mobile Robot
Aharony, N., Arie, T., Oron-Gilad, T., & Edan, Y. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-3522-1_36
Retracted: Feedback Control Based on Trust for Varied Automation Transparency
Dbritto, C., Lopes, J., Bandyopadhyay, K., Banerji, N., Mishra, I., & Kandpal, A. (2025) · International Conference on Advances in Computer Science, Electrical, Electronics, and Communication Technologies (CE2CT) · doi:10.1109/ce2ct64011.2025.10939546
RetractedCommunication Dynamics and Team Performance in Multiple-Operator-Multiple-Agent (MOMA) Team
Chung, H., & Yang, X. J. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) · doi:10.1109/ichms65439.2025.11154362
How Should Your Artificial Teammate Tell You How Much It Trusts You?
Jorge, C. C., Dumitrescu, E., Jonker, C. M., Loghin, R., Marossi, S., Uleia, E., & Tielman, M. L. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3717511.3747086 · Cited by 1
Adaptive and User-Centered HCI for Intelligent Technologies: A Global Perspective
Abdurrohman (2024) · Digitus : Journal of Computer Science Applications · doi:10.61978/digitus.v2i4.854
VirTLab-Eval: Human-Agent Team and Digital Twin Performance Evaluation Demonstration
Volkova, S., Kao, H.-T., Penafiel, L., Nguyen, D., Cohen, M. C., McCormack, R., & Cassani, L. (2025) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813251369797 · Cited by 1
WO: Menschen, Technologie und humane Technologie
Walther, C. C. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95463-4_2
Tohti, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, J., Li, J., shi, L., & Huang, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5611783
Helgert, A., Erle, L., Dittmann, A., Eimler, S. C., & Straßmann, C. (2025) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man63969.2025.11217627
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Finance
Ram, V. S., Sukirno, S., & Rao, S. G. R. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3725-8.ch009
(work)Flow bots vs. No bots: Workflow dynamics and AI utilization in teams
Fitzhugh, S. M. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100264
User Reliance on AI Support for Collaborative Partner Selection
Hrkalović, T. M., Dudzik, B., Hao, C., & Willemsen, M. C. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789082
Beyond Information Amount: Rethinking Transparency through Active Reasoning Demand
Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, Z. T., & Butz, A. M. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3757279.3785623
Rôle de l’acceptabilité dans l’interaction entre un véhicule conventionnel et un véhicule automatisé
Pottier, G. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/93ac0316z1d1bz4a77zb811za63aa5f8d98e
Explanation of the artificial agent : exploring the content and format of human interaction with AI
Guillou, M. L. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/31fa6b72z3709z4eb3z81c7z566d1b6cb118
Schwalb, J., Sung, E., Menon, V., Weger, K., & Mesmer, B. L. (2026) · IEEE SoutheastCon · doi:10.1109/southeastcon63549.2026.11476024
Impact of AI Transparency Levels on Human Performance, Trust, and Workload in Collaborative Tasks
Park, G., & Kim, S.-H. (2026) · Theoretical and Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.3390/tae2020009
Worker-Centered AI: Transparent Explanations for Trustworthy Task Recommendation in Crowd Work
Mazdarani, F., Hernandez, A. C., & Toxtli, C. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai68641.2026.11536153 · Cited by 1
Adaptable and Hybrid Automation for Human–AI Task Allocation: Application to Call Center Supervision
Donat-Bouillud, L., & Amokrane, K. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15112452
Rethinking Aviation Safety in the Age of Autonomy: From Tools to Cognitive Partners
Letouze, T. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29456-2_15
The Role of Transparency in Takeover Information for Trust Calibration in Automated Driving Systems
Liu, X., Wan, L., & Ge, Y. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29459-3_2
Tiwari, A., Arrabito, R., Davoust, A., & Falk, T. H. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30015-7_9
Designing Collaborative Intelligence
Ravikumar, R. N., & Aarthi, S. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8217-3.ch002
The impact of AI transparency and AI authorization on human performance in AI-to-human delegation
Tang, J., Wang, Y., Zhou, X., Zhao, Y. C., & Jiang, Y. (2026) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-026-10166-9
Calibrating Trust in ChatGPT for L2 Writers
유혜빈, Pecsok, M., & Pals, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30784-2_10
Too Much, Too Little, Just Right? Towards Dimensions of Trust Calibration in Human–AI Interaction
Börsting, I., & Hesenius, M. (2026) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3816046.3816283
Pithayarungsarit, P., Tafesse, H., Kannan, N., Henley, J. M., Saad, L., Trafton, J. G., & Roesler, E. (2026) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813261475167
Park, S., Lee, S., Park, S., & Nam, C. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2706905
Hart, S., Steane, V., Parnell, K. J., Plant, K. L., Soorati, M. D., & Young, M. S. (2026) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2026.2718460
Mezentseva, A., Fraboni, F., Kiplangat, S. G., Gualtieri, L., & Angelis, M. D. (2026) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2026.2729414
Metadata
- Authors
- Mercado, J. E., Rupp, M. A., Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M. J., Barber, D., & Procci, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mercado, Joseph E.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-02-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 401-415
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2321972046
- Semantic Scholar
- 5161e7babcca03e87642f3a130c2d25e338bde9a
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 48.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Keywords
- agent transparency, human-agent teaming, unmanned vehicles, intelligent agents, trust in automation, operator workload, operator performance, usability, military operations, heterogeneous robot teams, trust calibration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review