Cited by 2,298Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCounseling Practices and Supervision

Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory.

LaFromboise, Teresa, Coleman, Hardin L. K., Gerton, Jennifer·1993·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

A vital step in the development of an equal partnership for minorities in the academic, social, and economic life of the United States involves moving away from assumptions of the linear model of cultural acquisition. In this article we review the literature on the psychological impact of being bicultural. Assimilation, acculturation, alternation, multicultural, and fusion models that have been used to describe the psychological processes, social experiences, and individual challenges and obstacles of being bicultural are reviewed and summarized for their contributions and implications for investigations of the psychological impact of biculturalism. Emphasis is given to the alternation model, which posits that an individual is able to gain competence within 2 cultures without losing his or her cultural identity or having to choose one culture over the other. Finally, a hypothetical model outlining the dimensions of bicultural competence is presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.395

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultural identity distance or compartmentalization (vs. hyphenation or blending) seems related to existing theoretical notions of cultural identity alternation versus fusion.

    “Cultural identity distance or compartmentalization (vs.hyphenation or blending) seems related to existing theoretical notions of cultural identity alternation versus fusion (LaFromboise et al., 1993;Phinney & Devich-Navarro, 1997).”

    From Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents (2005) · cites this paper as LaFromboise et al., 1993

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H. L. K., & Gerton, J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1993-11
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
395-412
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2069593086
Cited by
2,298
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 119
FWCI
56.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH042473)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
biculturalism, bicultural competence, acculturation, assimilation, cultural identity, multiculturalism, fusion model, minority groups, cultural acquisition
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Communication, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Female, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review