Cited by 62Cultural Differences and ValuesEmotions and Moral BehaviorChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Differences and Similarities in the Use of Nine Emotion Regulation Strategies in Western and East-Asian Cultures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Song, Hongru, Chan, Jason S., Ryan, Christian·2024·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

Differences in emotion regulation strategies usage between Western and East-Asian individuals have been shown to exist. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to synthesize differences and similarities of the spontaneous use frequency of nine emotion regulation strategies (suppression, reappraisal, acceptance, avoidance, rumination, mindfulness, distraction, expression, and self-compassion), in Western and East-Asian individuals. Quantitative comparison studies were identified through systematic and snowball searches. Meta-analysis was undertaken with the meta package from R. Nineteen articles involving 21 studies were included in the systematic review and 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis. These articles were published from 2002 to 2023. The results showed that East-Asian individuals use more suppression ( d = −0.29) and avoidance ( d = −0.57) compared with Western individuals, with a medium effect size. No significant difference was observed in reappraisal, rumination, and expression usage. Future comparison studies across Western and East-Asian cultures should consider focusing on the use of self-compassion, acceptance, distraction, and mindfulness, which are understudied in the field of emotion regulation. Moreover, to improve the methodology, address inadequacies in analyzing cultural measurement invariance, distinguishing between emotional valences, and reporting the ethnicity of participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00220221241285006

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACT's individualistic emphasis on personal values often clashes with collectivist relational duties, and clients may find Western mindfulness and acceptance strategies foreign or incompatible with their cultural coping styles.

    “For example, ACT's individualistic emphasis on personal values often clashes with collectivist relational duties, and clients may find Western mindfulness and acceptance strategies foreign or incompatible with their cultural coping styles.17,35,36”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, H., Chan, J. S., & Ryan, C.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Song, Hongru
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
2024-10-09
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
OpenAlex
W4403258028
Cited by
62
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 2
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotion regulation strategies, cross-cultural comparison, emotional suppression, avoidance, cognitive reappraisal, rumination, mindfulness, self-compassion, acceptance, distraction, emotional expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review